- Thread starter
- #21
You're 0 for 2...
I'm battin' 1.000
Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're 0 for 2...
Yes, of course. Avoiding the content of a post, and instead limpwristedly attempting to attack the poster is a sure sign of a winning position. In Leftist echo chambers...You're 0 for 2...
I'm battin' 1.000
Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.
Yes, of course. Avoiding the content of a post, and instead limpwristedly attempting to attack the poster is a sure sign of a winning position. In Leftist echo chambers...You're 0 for 2...
I'm battin' 1.000
Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.
0 for 3...
0 for 4. Not quick enough on your feet to defend your own folly we see... Youre proof the left doesn’t have a monopoly on the mindless drone department...Yes, of course. Avoiding the content of a post, and instead limpwristedly attempting to attack the poster is a sure sign of a winning position. In Leftist echo chambers...You're 0 for 2...
I'm battin' 1.000
Watch my next homerun: you're a moron, the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.
0 for 3...
"...attempting to attack the poster..."
Welcome to the karma cafe....there are no menus but you will get what you deserve.
1. Not 'attempt,' .....accomplish.
2. You deserve it.
3. ... and I'm really good at it.
YepWe should not have parallel legal systems, especially inasmuch as one seeks to supplant the other.
Especially with one that requires submission to the Q'ran.
At the rate currently; we’ll all be dead before we see a solid proposal from the Left...Na it won't be scientology it will be the o called Christian religion that seems to want religious laws taken from their interpretation of the Bible. How many different denominations of Christian are there. So we can plainly see that not all Christians agree. Actually very few agree. But this argument about Sharia law is just another diversion from what these idiots on the right are doing. The want a white only country. So the right will start this false bullshit in case that another black gets elected as president. They need falsehood to counter solid proposals from the left.
We're 'one nation under God', doesn't that mean his laws take precedence?In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.
Na it won't be scientology it will be the o called Christian religion that seems to want religious laws taken from their interpretation of the Bible. How many different denominations of Christian are there. So we can plainly see that not all Christians agree. Actually very few agree. But this argument about Sharia law is just another diversion from what these idiots on the right are doing. The want a white only country. So the right will start this false bullshit in case that another black gets elected as president. They need falsehood to counter solid proposals from the left.
That's why we torture people in Cuba ?In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ ...
We're 'one nation under God', doesn't that mean his laws take precedence?In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.
We're endowed with 'inalienable rights' by God, doesn't that mean his rights take precedence?
There is a Religious Liberty movement in this country to overturn or prevent laws that conflict with religions.
Jews, based on the Bible, keep Kosher laws without violating the Constitution but they are instructed in that same Bible to stone adulterers to death, should they be prohibited from practicing any Jewish laws?
That's why we torture people in Cuba ?In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ ...
Islamic Arbitration.Arbitration is a big business over here and cheaper than going to court.Well...if Muslims in America CHOOSE to be subject to Sharia law and Sharia courts, they are simply an overlay on the criminal justice system and the civil court system, not a substitute.
Say I have a disagreement (or a family dispute) with my neighbor about a business transaction, and we both agree to have it adjudicated by a Sharia judge. Who cares? If both parties are agreeable.
Unless their is a conflict - say w/r/t polygamy - who cares?
And the way our courts are going, polygamy will be "legal" here within a generation anyway.
Murder of Lee Rigby - Wikipedia
You're entire reply was an Ann Coulter quote and you think I'm the oneNow answer my question: are you more a fool or more a liar?
I mean...today.
I know you love to write your own version of history so let's compare then:We're 'one nation under God', doesn't that mean his laws take precedence?In America, the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ we are not a theocracy, and that should be clear to all. The Constitution is the only law the people of the United States have agreed to be governed by.
We're endowed with 'inalienable rights' by God, doesn't that mean his rights take precedence?
There is a Religious Liberty movement in this country to overturn or prevent laws that conflict with religions.
Jews, based on the Bible, keep Kosher laws without violating the Constitution but they are instructed in that same Bible to stone adulterers to death, should they be prohibited from practicing any Jewish laws?
How many times will imbecile....like you.....try to pretend that the religion on which this nation was built, the Judeo-Christian faith, .....is exactly the same as when the Bible was collated.....some three and a half millennia ago.
1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.
First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.
Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.
Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:
A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion
B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet
C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions
D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax
E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur
F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days
G) Kill gays
H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys
2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.
3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue
Please don't waste space with another of your inane and fallacious posts.
The shoe bomber has never come out of his cell here.
They have to force -feed many inmates here to keep them alive.
(Colorado)