otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 36,381
- 11,641
- 1,315
I won’t pat herself on the back. You don’t discuss science, you parrot denial.
Says the guy who doesn't seem to be able to produce any science to the guy who has backed every claim he has made with published science... laughable....and pitiful...
You have provided nothing which will refute what has been established as scientific fact in regard to AGW.
You have not refuted a single fact on the NASA website.
When do you think that will happen?
I addressed your NASA link not long ago, you ignored it. You also ignored a QUESTION I asked you several times about something in that link, you ignored it.
You never did bother to discuss YOUR link at all, you ran away instead, to spread your ignorant spittle in other threads.
You have not proved any argument which convinces anyone (outside the denial bubble) that NASA has it wrong.
Post away
Just the fact that NASA is having to falsify data in order to support their narrative is evidence that they have it wrong....why else falsify data?
Again, what data has been falsified?