GoneBezerk
Rookie
- May 14, 2011
- 7,603
- 493
- 0
- Banned
- #121
Uh....wrong.
The Arab League already opposes Assad and would support the US coalition blowing up Assad's forces.
The Arab League turned on China and Russia for not supporting the original UN resolutions against Assad, but of course you now think they would turn on us for actually saving the Syrian people from Assad.![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
The Arab League already opposes Assad and would support the US coalition blowing up Assad's forces.
The Arab League turned on China and Russia for not supporting the original UN resolutions against Assad, but of course you now think they would turn on us for actually saving the Syrian people from Assad.
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
It's called air and missile strikes.
The problem is that Syria will probably shoot off their missiles at Israel.
We either level the Syrian military or let them kill all the protestors off.....
How would we do that?
Destroying the Syrian Military to the point where it could no longer attack its own people would require us seriously assaulting that country with air strikes, cruise missiles, the works, thats something I don't think we would be willing to commit to, there is no NATO coalition following us into Syria, and once the Muslim world sees the images of dead Syrians killed by American bombs all their anger will be directed at us, not Assad's regime.