strollingbones
Diamond Member
isnt it rather early to take the shot...i always take it at halloween .....so that i dont have to repeat the shot in the winter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
people can have reactions to any vaccine....a medical profession will also tell you that
I have never had one. I don't think I want to start, either. They scare me. The flu does too, but I think I would rather take my chances without the shot.
I have never had one. I don't think I want to start, either. They scare me. The flu does too, but I think I would rather take my chances without the shot.
I got mine several weeks ago.
Quick and painless.
Never have and never will. I trust Nature to do its job, just like it does the rest of the year.
Forgive me if I find gummint-driven fear tactics less than convincing.
Get flu shots. It's the right thing to do, not just for you, but for humanity. It slows down the spread, it interrupts the mutation rate, it's a good thing.
NO. It's a bad idea. I would be a horrible and irresponsible parent if I did.
FDA admits in court case that vaccines still contain mercury
http://www.naturalnews.com/035432_vaccines_mercury_court_case.html#
You should check what is in your flu shot. Hardly anyone does.(NaturalNews) It is a common myth today that the vaccines administered to children no longer contain the toxic additive thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative linked to causing permanent neurological damage. But a recent federal case involving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revealed that, contrary to this widely-held belief, thimerosal is actually still present in many batch vaccines, including in the annual influenza vaccine that is now administered to children as young as six months old.
Filed by a citizen-backed coalition advocating vaccine safety, the lawsuit against the FDA alleged that the agency's continued endorsement and approval of thimerosal as a vaccine additive is a serious public health threat, especially since safer alternatives already exist and are widely used voluntarily by many vaccine manufacturers. But Judge Brett Kavanaugh, siding with antiquated pseudoscience, decided that thimerosal is not a health threat, and that those who wish to avoid it can simply choose thimerosal-free alternatives.
http://dr-king.com/docs/110915_PGKReviewOfUSSubmissionToUNEP_b.pdf
I prefer to follow that money.First, this reviewer does not disagree with much of what is said in the preceding paragraph concerning vaccines. However, most of the vaccines that truly have contributed greatly to the health and well-being of children, adolescents, and adults neither contain Thimerosal nor use Thimerosal as a preservative. Further, this reviewer notes that even the FDA has admitted that the safety of Thimerosal, when used as a preservative, has not been established to the regulatory standard, sufficiently nontoxic ...
4 This fact was established in a three-year investigation by a United States House Committee and set forth in the A. Findings section of its published 2003 report as set forth in Title 21 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) at paragraph 610.15(a) [21 CFR § 610.15(a)].5
http://www.wanttoknow.info/060215vaccinesmercurydangers
The Man Behind The Vaccine Mystery"Just before President Bush signed the homeland security bill into law an unknown member of Congress inserted a provision into the legislation that blocks lawsuits against the maker of a controversial [mercury-based] vaccine preservative called "thimerosal," used in vaccines that are given to children."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/12/eveningnews/main532886.shtml
I have never had one. I don't think I want to start, either. They scare me. The flu does too, but I think I would rather take my chances without the shot.
Count on the fact that there will be no media hype about a flu epidemic this year because the feds have their hands full with the Hussein/care debacle.