The border wall

[konradv]

It's the law.

The law is whatever the president says it is. SCOTUS said so!

#KARMA

 

[Nostra]

It's a waste of money.

I have already shown you the numbers, Stupid.

Walls work.

 

[Nostra]

Because Congress was misinformed about how innefective any new structure would be.
There already is a security system on the border. Physical barriers are part of it.
The billions spent on any new structure is a gross waste of money just for a Trump photo-op.

Nope. The court will find that the Biden Admin. had authorityto reappropriate the funds and put them to better use.

Well....your predictions generally suck don't they?


Not at all.
A showboat Congress and soon to be ex-POTUS trying to score political points right before election.

Once again you deny reality. I showed you the numbers.


Walls work.

 

[Nostra]

The law is whatever the president says it is. SCOTUS said so!

#KARMA

Liar. The SC said no such thing.

 

[MagicMike]

I have already shown you the numbers, Stupid.

Walls work.

Conclusion​

Trump’s border wall proposal is deeply flawed and misguided. It fails to effectively address the issues about which he claims to care, including security, migration, and the drug trade. Furthermore, it compromises the well-being of all Americans by significantly costing taxpayers, exacerbating environmental concerns, and above all, setting a dangerous precedent for the broad violations of private property rights. The majority of Americans oppose continued border wall construction, as does every congressperson representing a border district, including Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX), who raised concerns about more than 1,000 Texas farmers losing their land if a wall was built. Rather than wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on an ineffective wall, the Trump administration should pursue more fact-based, bipartisan solutions to border security.

Trump’s Border Wall Is an Expensive, Ineffective Application of Eminent Domain

The Trump administration’s proposed border wall is not only expensive, ineffective, and bad for the environment; it is also a misuse of eminent domain law and an affront to private property rights.

www.americanprogress.org

 

[Nostra]

Conclusion​

Trump’s border wall proposal is deeply flawed and misguided. It fails to effectively address the issues about which he claims to care, including security, migration, and the drug trade. Furthermore, it compromises the well-being of all Americans by significantly costing taxpayers, exacerbating environmental concerns, and above all, setting a dangerous precedent for the broad violations of private property rights. The majority of Americans oppose continued border wall construction, as does every congressperson representing a border district, including Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX), who raised concerns about more than 1,000 Texas farmers losing their land if a wall was built. Rather than wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on an ineffective wall, the Trump administration should pursue more fact-based, bipartisan solutions to border security.

Trump’s Border Wall Is an Expensive, Ineffective Application of Eminent Domain

The Trump administration’s proposed border wall is not only expensive, ineffective, and bad for the environment; it is also a misuse of eminent domain law and an affront to private property rights.

www.americanprogress.org

Opinion piece from alt-left "american progress".

 

[MagicMike]

Opinion piece from alt-left "american progress".

Yep. I find it more credible than the Trump White House press release propaganda you are trying to cite.

 

[Paleman]

Waste of money and time.

Put up or shut up JERKofnotrades!!! I demand that you show us millions upon million of illegals entering this country by climbing over Trumps wall. They haven't because they can't. If Reagan where here now he would be saying "BUILD THAT WALL".

 

[Nostra]

Yep. I find it more credible than the Trump White House press release propaganda you are trying to cite.

I quoted official DHS and CBP numbers, Dumbass.