Social-Justice Curricula Having Measurable Impact on Students, Study Finds

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
22,769
44,363
2,290
Well, no fooling, Lenin knew all about this and the Soviets implemented such lies in the 1920s.

And this is nothing more than Marxist ideology being spoon-fed to young skulls full of mush here in the USA.


Both critical race theory and radical gender ideology are widespread in American schools and are measurably shifting students to the political left, according to a Manhattan Institute report released Thursday.

Based on a survey of more than 1,500 Americans aged 18-20, the report seeks to inject hard data into a cultural debate often fought with anecdotal evidence. In the last five years, right-leaning activists, politicians, and educators have increasingly raised the alarm about curricula changes in schools.

Researchers Zach Goldberg and Eric Kaufmann decided to put questions to a random sample of students who recently graduated from high school and can recollect their recent school experiences. This allowed them to estimate the extent to which these ideologies have affected American education as a whole.


The first step was to ask respondents whether they had been exposed to fundamental concepts of these ideologies in school. “There are many genders, not just male and female,” read one of the concepts. “In America, white people have white privilege,” read another. “America is built on stolen land,” read a third.


Goldberg and Kaufmann discovered that students had heard about at least one of eight concepts from a teacher or other adult at school. Ninety percent heard about at least one CRT concept, and 74 percent heard about at least one radical gender concept.


Only a third — 32 percent — of students were taught that there are respectable counterarguments to CRT and radical gender ideology.


“Educators who incorporate such concepts into their instruction clearly expect, or at least hope, that doing so makes a difference in the minds of students,” explained Goldberg and Kaufmann, adding that the idea these concepts are only taught for knowledge’s sake strains credulity.


Students taught one or more of these concepts were more likely to agree with them. They also adopted policy attitudes in line with these concepts to a greater extent. For instance, support for preferential hiring and promotion of black people increases from 17 percent among those who were not exposed to CRT in school to 44 percent among those exposed to the maximum of five CRT concepts.

...


 
There's a lot right about marxism. The modern state is based a lot on the idea of marx, engles and fabian.

We wouldn't be the world power we're with the leadership we have if it wasn't for it. We wouldn't have our middle class and we sure as shit wouldn't be free. Our middle class is based on this fairness and we can't afford to give it all to the elite. It is a balance.

Did he get a lot of things wrong? Yes he did. But we have a decent model of what works.
 
There's a lot right about marxism. The modern state is based a lot on the idea of marx, engles and fabian.

We wouldn't be the world power we're with the leadership we have if it wasn't for it. We wouldn't have our middle class and we sure as shit wouldn't be free. Our middle class is based on this fairness and we can't afford to give it all to the elite. It is a balance.

Did he get a lot of things wrong? Yes he did. But we have a decent model of what works.
Mao's china and Stalins russia were strong armed into a dicatorship that quickly bent away from economic fairness and economic mobility. They're not good models,. America is...China after reform is decent but needs to be more democratic and move away form dictatorship that plagues our nation states.
 
Also there's nothing wrong with treating people that are different with respect and as human beings. That is something the failures didn't have, believe me.
 
There's a lot right about marxism. The modern state is based a lot on the idea of marx, engles and fabian.

We wouldn't be the world power we're with the leadership we have if it wasn't for it. We wouldn't have our middle class and we sure as shit wouldn't be free. Our middle class is based on this fairness and we can't afford to give it all to the elite. It is a balance.

Did he get a lot of things wrong? Yes he did. But we have a decent model of what works.
~~~~~~
You forget that America was already a nation created by our forefathers and through a Civil War prior to each of your idols.
 
Mao's china and Stalins russia were strong armed into a dicatorship that quickly bent away from economic fairness and economic mobility. They're not good models,. America is...China after reform is decent but needs to be more democratic and move away form dictatorship that plagues our nation states.
More drivel......
 
Mao's china and Stalins russia were strong armed into a dicatorship that quickly bent away from economic fairness and economic mobility. They're not good models,. America is...China after reform is decent but needs to be more democratic and move away form dictatorship that plagues our nation states.
What is economic fairness? Opportunity or Redistribution?
 
More right wing propaganda at best. Show us some K-12 schools that are teaching CRT.

You are opposed to CRT because it shows the ugly side of American History that is not currently being taught.
 
Well, no fooling, Lenin knew all about this and the Soviets implemented such lies in the 1920s.

And this is nothing more than Marxist ideology being spoon-fed to young skulls full of mush here in the USA.


Both critical race theory and radical gender ideology are widespread in American schools and are measurably shifting students to the political left, according to a Manhattan Institute report released Thursday.
Based on a survey of more than 1,500 Americans aged 18-20, the report seeks to inject hard data into a cultural debate often fought with anecdotal evidence. In the last five years, right-leaning activists, politicians, and educators have increasingly raised the alarm about curricula changes in schools.
Researchers Zach Goldberg and Eric Kaufmann decided to put questions to a random sample of students who recently graduated from high school and can recollect their recent school experiences. This allowed them to estimate the extent to which these ideologies have affected American education as a whole.
The first step was to ask respondents whether they had been exposed to fundamental concepts of these ideologies in school. “There are many genders, not just male and female,” read one of the concepts. “In America, white people have white privilege,” read another. “America is built on stolen land,” read a third.
Goldberg and Kaufmann discovered that students had heard about at least one of eight concepts from a teacher or other adult at school. Ninety percent heard about at least one CRT concept, and 74 percent heard about at least one radical gender concept.
Only a third — 32 percent — of students were taught that there are respectable counterarguments to CRT and radical gender ideology.
“Educators who incorporate such concepts into their instruction clearly expect, or at least hope, that doing so makes a difference in the minds of students,” explained Goldberg and Kaufmann, adding that the idea these concepts are only taught for knowledge’s sake strains credulity.
Students taught one or more of these concepts were more likely to agree with them. They also adopted policy attitudes in line with these concepts to a greater extent. For instance, support for preferential hiring and promotion of black people increases from 17 percent among those who were not exposed to CRT in school to 44 percent among those exposed to the maximum of five CRT concepts.
...


By the 1880's Marxism was gaining serious ground in our USA. Unlike a typical cult based on an individual personality like Hitler, Marxism was & is based upon a philosophy of endless revolution(progressive) & war. As with any cult Marxism operates on false pretenses, hollow promises of a better life & equality for all. Of course the propaganda of Marxism is just that, propaganda to benefit the few in charge. Marxism has proven itself to be contrary to the current state of the human condition(human nature). Both ignorance & outright deceit are needed for Marxism to attract new converts "into the fold", identifying it as a less than beneficial religion of choice.

Still, the religion of Marxism attracts the gullible, less well informed & those that suffer from autophobia, have the fear of rejection, power mongers, & those that are group dependent for survival. Estimates in the social sciences vary somewhat but generally are in the 10% to 15% for natural born leaders & 85% to 90% for natural born followers. Rest assured with the before mentioned ratio of followers to leaders Marxism will be around to the end of humanity(or be the end of humanity!), unfortunately for humanity in general.
 

Forum List

Back
Top