Special Counsel Jack Smith has withdrawn his case

[Rawley]

They did ask to search, when the NA/FBI representatives went to MAL in June to receive the Redweld of 38 documents. Their request for a voluntary search was denied.

Who told you this?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Who told you this?

Who told you otherwise?

 

[Rawley]

They didn’t go straight for a search warrant. They went for a subpoena first. Trump made it clear that he was not going to cooperate and so seeking a consensual search would have been foolish.

Why?

 

[Marener]

Inadmissible? We aren’t in court, nobody is on trial

His testimony was admissible in the congressional hearing.

Moreover, it’s not hearsay. It’s not an out of court statement offered in court for the truth of the matter asserted

It’s simply a statement as to the procedures that took place in the investigation he was a lead on.

Moreover based on his twenty years of experience in the fbi he could be an expert witness and testify to his opinion. Which is what he did when he highlighted all the abnormalities in the case by the xiden admin

Why were there so many abdormalities? Why wasn’t a US Attorney assigned?

Your source wasn’t there and so he has no idea if they asked to search the boxes. That means any claim he makes about that day is hearsay and irrelevant.

We do know that they were specifically forbidden from searching the boxes and we we do know that Trump had documents in those boxes he was legally required to turn over.

That means Trump was indeed hiding the documents from the FBI.

 

[struth]

They didn’t go straight for a search warrant. They went for a subpoena first. Trump made it clear that he was not going to cooperate and so seeking a consensual search would have been foolish.

Haha he had agents meet him at his house, handed them documents, and let them see where the other boxes were

The FBI agent testified they never even asked for consent to search
You lie

 

[Marener]

Why?

Good question. They should have started with a search warrant. They went with a subpoena first because they were giving Trump special privileged treatment.

 

[Rawley]

Good question. They should have started with a search warrant. They went with a subpoena first because they were giving Trump special privileged treatment.

Your TDS is showing

 

[Marener]

The FBI agent testified they never even asked for consent to search

Why would the FBI need to search anything? Trump was legally required to hand all the documents over.

 

[Marener]

Your TDS is showing

Just facts. If it had been anyone else, they would have busted down the door.

The fact that they went with a subpoena shows the deference they gave Trump.

 

[Marener]

No I didn't, are you saying lawfair against a political opponent is legal and ethical? Do you support that? You should really wash your hands. They are dirty

Prosecuting someone for retaining classified documents, obstructing justice and tampering with witnesses isn’t lawfare.

I support prosecuting criminals.

 

[struth]

Why would the FBI need to search anything? Trump was legally required to hand all the documents over.

I agree, they didn’t need to be there at all. This was between trump and the NARA

Xiden admin used it as a poly to start a political prosecution

 

[struth]

Just facts. If it had been anyone else, they would have busted down the door.

The fact that they went with a subpoena shows the deference they gave Trump.

Really did they bust Clinton’s door down? Xiden’s? No.

You lie

 

[Rawley]

Just facts. If it had been anyone else, they would have busted down the door.

The fact that they went with a subpoena shows the deference they gave Trump.

The fact that NARA told Trump he was on his own when packing up the WH, says you're full of shit. They were out to fuck him over from the start.

 

[Marener]

I agree, they didn’t need to be there at all. This was between trump and the NARA

NARA referred the case to the DoJ, who became involved to investigate potential mishandling of classified documents which is a criminal matter.

That’s why the DoJ got a subpoena for the documents, which obligated Trump to turn them over.

If Trump was legally obligated to turn them over, why would the FBI need to search Mar a Lago?

The answer is that Trump committed a felony by not complying with the subpoena.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Prosecuting someone for retaining classified documents, obstructing justice and tampering with witnesses isn’t lawfare.

I support prosecuting criminals.

Unprecedented searches of president's homes and appointing illegal prosecutors to persecute is called lawfare. Do you support that? Smith had to withdraw his case . Dirty hands

 

[Marener]

The fact that NARA told Trump he was on his own when packing up the WH, says you're full of shit. They were out to fuck him over from the start.

NARA doesn’t pack up anyone’s White House. That’s not their job and they don’t have the funding or personnel to do so.

You guys need to learn to pick up after yourselves, you lazy fucks.

 

[WEATHER53]

Your TDS is showing

TDS is in fact now their skin pigment

 

[Marener]

Unprecedented searches of president's homes and appointing illegal prosecutors to persecute is called lawfare. Do you support that? Smith had to withdraw his case . Dirty hands

Trump’s unprecedented criminality necessitated the unprecedented search.

Blaming everyone else demonstrates how pathetic you are.

 

[WEATHER53]

It was fully on display that Jack is special.

 

[Rawley]

NARA doesn’t pack up anyone’s White House. That’s not their job and they don’t have the funding or personnel to do so.

You guys need to learn to pick up after yourselves, you lazy fucks.

They took custody of CLinton's, Bush's Obamas ... documents. They told Trump to go fuck himself.