Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

[Doc7505]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.

The conservative Center for Renewing America expressed the complaint in a letter to the Judicial Conference. The complaint alleges that Jackson did not report some of her husband's income for more than a decade. The letter urges the group to refer the matter to Attorney General Merrick Garland to begin an ethics investigation.
The letter claims that Jackson "repeatedly failed to disclose that her husband received income from medical malpractice consulting fees."
"We know this by Justice Jackson’s own admission in her amended disclosure form for 2020, filed when she was nominated to the Supreme Court, that ‘some of my previously filed reports inadvertently omitted' her husband’s income from ‘consulting on medical malpractice cases,’" it continues.
The letter says that Jackson gave "the vague statement that 'some' of those past disclosures contained material omissions."

The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

Second, there is reason to believe that Justice Jackson may have failed to report the private funding sources of her massive investiture celebration at the Library of Congress in her most recent financial disclosure. The Conference should open an investigation to determine if Justice Jackson needs to remedy this potential omission. Given the need to ensure the equal application of the law and the tendency of these violations to create serious recusal issues and conflicts of interest, the Conference’s prompt attention is of paramount public importance.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

 

[wamose]

Our border is wide open. Inflation is making us poor. Homelessness and drug addiction are at an all time high. Colorado's Supreme Court has gone rogue totalitarian. But some jerkoffs are worried that a SC justice's husband didn't claim $1000 in income? Get real. Our government needs to start addressing the life and death priorities of this country. I see this petty inquiry as a diversion from the systemic problems that both Democrats and RINOs seem to be content to cover up. MAGA.

 

[jackflash]

Our border is wide open. Inflation is making us poor. Homelessness and drug addiction are at an all time high. Colorado's Supreme Court has gone rogue totalitarian. But some jerkoffs are worried that a SC justice's husband didn't claim $1000 in income? Get real. Our government needs to start addressing the life and death priorities of this country. I see this petty inquiry as a diversion from the systemic problems that both Democrats and RINOs seem to be content to cover up. MAGA.

Wamose don't worry as the RepubliCratic Duopoly Party(RCDP) is coming to the American constituencies rescue!

 

[Votto]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

To be fair, if she does not know what a woman is, how should she be expected to know what income is?

Doesn't seem fair since math is racist.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

why wasnt this brought up during her confirmation hearing?...she was confirmed now you have to live with it.....

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

Some of her HUSBAND's income, may have been omitted?
Which she admits.
Thomas didn't even disclose HIS multi- 1000 $$$, "gifts"................. let alone his treasonous wife's "gifts".

Teabaggers, whining about a candy store getting robbed, ignoring the bank getting robbed.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

why wasnt this brought up during her confirmation hearing?...she was confirmed now you have to live with it.....

"During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures".

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Some of her HUSBAND's income, may have been omitted?
Which she admits.
Thomas didn't even disclose HIS multi- 1000 $$$, "gifts"................. let alone his treasonous wife's "gifts".

Teabaggers, whining about a candy store getting robbed, ignoring the bank getting robbed.

It's different because the Black man doesn't act the way the Democratic party demands.

 

[Harry Dresden]

"During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures".

ok so why is someone crying about this?...they should have got on her right there about this....they didnt....so now she has a job for as long as she lives.....

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It's different because the Black man doesn't act the way the Democratic party demands.

Yeah.....................within the law and ethics.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

ok so why is someone crying about this?...they should have got on her right there about this....they didnt.

I don't know.

...so now she has a job for as long as she lives.....

Which, I think is wrong.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I don't know.

Which, I think is wrong.

so do i.....no one deserves to be appointed to a lifetime job....should be ten years and you are out of there....

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Yeah.....................within the law and ethics.

Bullshit it's because he is a Black Conservative to you loons that is the worst crime a minority could commit. The proof is your downplaying of the complaint against Justice Jackson. Thomas ain't Black in your eyes.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court doesn't have the same ethics code the rest of the Government has.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It’s odd to have a SCOTUS judge who does not know what a woman is. She seems kinda stupid.

She definitely needs to recuse herself from anything in women’s rights, because she is not a biologist.

 

[Independent thinker]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

Can't wait for all of the left attacks on her. LOL

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Bullshit it's because he is a Black Conservative to you loons that is the worst crime a minority could commit.

"Conservative"?
No such party exist, black, brown or white.
Teabaggers claim they are, just to fool the gullible and to imply, they are good with $$$.
Thomas is a fucking crook, a lying crook, of course, teabaggers look the other way.

The proof is your downplaying of the complaint against Justice Jackson.

No, by all means, go for it.

Thomas ain't Black in your eyes.

Looks black to me.

 

[Mashmont]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

Brown might be among the least qualified justices in history. She and the softball player who doesn't like men.

 

[ColonelAngus]

She should resign from the court........RIGHT, CULT?

 

[Lesh]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Facing Ethics Complaint Over Failure to Disclose Income

redstate.com

19 Dec 2023 ~~ By Jedd Charles

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is facing an ethics complaint over alleged failures to disclose details about her income. A conservative group filed the complaint, bringing these allegations to light.
Jackson’s complaint centers on her alleged failure to disclose her husband’s income.


The crux of the matter lies in the rules mandating that justice disclose any income exceeding $1,000 under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The group notes that while she disclosed two of her husband’s clients in 2011, subsequent filings did not include this information. During her 2020 nomination to the court, the justice acknowledged that some of her husband’s income had been “inadvertently omitted” in prior disclosures.
Adding to the matter are concerns about Jackson’s reporting of the source of funding for her 2022 Supreme Court investiture celebration, according to the Center for Renewing America.

This development draws parallels with other reports homing in on Justice Thomas, scrutinizing him for his relationship with a wealthy real estate tycoon. These reports have prompted calls for the judge’s resignation from Democrats. Of course, it is worth noting that the reports and subsequent criticisms coming from the left are clearly motivated by politics, and their decision to ignore the complaint against Jackson essentially proves it.
If the media were truly concerned about ethics among members of the Supreme Court, they would have focused on both stories and given equal attention to other justices regardless of their ideological leaning. But, since Jackson is a progressive, they can’t bother to examine her with the same microscope they apply to Thomas or any other conservative justice.


Commentary:
She is strictly an affirmative action hire. Additionally, Ketanji Brown Jackson is an in your face distortion of Justice foisted upon America's Supreme Court Jurisprudence. She doesn’t belong anywhere near any court as a decider of anything.
".husband's....income from medical malpractice consulting fees.
I'm betting, surely KBJ's husband as a consultant knows what a woman is.
Meanwhile, hits on Clarence Thomas abound. It’s pathetic. I long for the days of impartial journalism.
Lawfare has raised it's ugly head in the halls of the Supreme Court.

If this bothers you , you must be OUTRAGED by the actions of Alitto and Thomas