Moon
Why so serious?
- Aug 9, 2008
- 689
- 171
Did you do drugs in your teens, In her teenage years(the 70s) drugs and sex were everywhere.
It was a crime in the 70's and it remains one to this day. So the fact that drugs were supposedly "everywhere" is totally irrelevant. Giving drugs to a child was criminal. Having sexual intercourse or oral sex with a child was criminal. Forcing sex upon anybody regardless of age was criminal.
In short, you do a lot of babbling but you have managed to say nothing intelligent or intelligible on this topic.
Let's simplify this for you.
WHEN (in the 1970's up to the present moment) may a fully grown man have sexual intercourse or receive oral sex from a 13 year old child? Don't strain yourself. This is not a trick question. It is elementally simple. The sole valid answer is "never." To do so is criminal today and was criminal then. Roman Polanski did it. Therefore his action was criminal.
WHEN (in the 1970's up to the present moment) may a fully grown man (not a physician) provide controlled substances to a 13 year old child? Don't strain yourself. This, too, is not a trick question. It is elementally simple. The sole valid answer is "never." To do so in the 1970's was criminal and it is still criminal. Roman Polanski did it. Therefore his action was criminal.
So what are you attempting to justify, frog?
Support of a pedophile, child abusing, criminal scumbag like Roman Polanski (even if you are consistently incoherent in your attempt to be supportive of him) is sick. You attempt to provide support for Polanski. Therefore, you are sick. Seriously. You are morally degenerate.
As I've said all through this post i am not condoning Polanski I'm just looking at the facts as told by the victim, and it was not rape.
Actually, you're finding every way possible to rationalize what Polanski did, so you are indeed condoning what he did.