pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 76,902
- 30,376
- 2,210
I don't believe this is a proper choice of reading material for middle schoolers. Assigned or not.
Fair enough. I have no problem with that argument.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't believe this is a proper choice of reading material for middle schoolers. Assigned or not.
So you think it is okay to put gay porn books in a school classroom or library? Because if the kids choose it themselves it’s not the adult’s responsibility?
Wow you are a complete fucking idiot.
I think if you truly opposed it, you would say it’s wrong, perverse, and the teacher should be fired/arrested for it.I think the story needs presented factually before it can be discussed.
Again, I said none of what you said. Why is it so difficult for you to be honest?
I think if you truly opposed it, you would say it’s wrong, perverse, and the teacher should be fired/arrested for it.
A playboy magazine at a friends house is not in the same galaxy as an official public school teacher condoning a book onto her middle school students that discusses sucking d*ck and educates them on downloading sex apps on your phone to hook up with people.Do I think the teacher should be arrested? Lol...no.
Do I think it's a proper book for a school to present to middle school students? No.
I can remember being in 9th grade. I was over a friend's house and in their bathroom a Playboy mag was in the basket with other mags. I guess his dad liked to read the stories as he did his business. Should he be arrested? No. Is it something I would do? Absolutely not.
I had a teacher in 6th grade that allowed us to listen to Cheech and Chong. I'm sure there are those out there that would think she should have been arrested.
It was mentioned earlier that with some everything has to be a moral crises. It's not a crises.
A playboy magazine at a friends house is not in the same galaxy as an official public school teacher condoning a book onto her middle school students that discusses sucking d*ck and educates them on downloading sex apps on your phone to hook up with people.
Theres a breech of trust and innocence of a teacher that does that.. like a CEO that forces himself onto a subordinate or else she loses her job
The story was factually presented. The sick school teacher put gay porn in her classroom and allowed children access to it.I think the story needs presented factually before it can be discussed.
Again, I said none of what you said. Why is it so difficult for you to be honest?
Needs to be four more so we can absolutely expose teachers like these for what they are sick, the fact that you are questioning it makes me wonder whether you are for or against firing this pedo/homoIsn't this your second thread on this tonight?
If a stranger were on the street offering sexually explicit material to minors, would they be arrested? Would you oppose that arrest?Do I think the teacher should be arrested? Lol...no.
George Carlin once said that the cure for overpopulation was death penalty for parking tickets.So who else should be murdered? Just a yes or no suffices
Rapists?
Kidnappers?
Drunk drivers?
Domestic abusers?
Thieves?
Drug dealers?
Jaywalkers?
pknopp
What do you disagree with? That a random guy handing out sexually explicit material to minors on the street would be arrested, or that a teacher doing so is worse for the reason's a listed?
What do you disagree with though? It's 100% illegal to distribute sexually explicit material to minors. You will be arrested if you're caught doing so. So you disagree that teachers hold a special position of trust? That they should be respected by their students? That they are in authority over students? That their students will take what they say more to heart than some stranger on the street? That it's important what our teachers are saying to and around our students? Which one of those things do you disagree with? Or do you disagree with all of them?I disagreed with you. You had your say and I had mine. Nothing else to discuss.
That wasn’t the question I asked.I DON'T agree the teacher should be arrested. There is nothing else to discuss. On top of that people who support a guy that brags about sexually assaulting women have nothing of value to say to me on this topic.
This is insane. A teacher assigned “This Book is Gay” to her middle school kids to read.. here are some Examples from the book:
“gay men have slightly longer and thicker winkies. Excellent.”
“sliding your mouth up and down the shaft of his c***.”
It provides advice on how to provide a “A GOOD HANDIE” instead of “A BAD HANDIE.”
It explains that “sex doesn’t begin and end with your d***. Be creative.”
It promotes the ease and convenience of sex apps, noting that “the app works out your location” by itself and that “because they are near, it is easy to meet up with them.”
Its glossary provides the much-needed definitions for the sexual terms for eating poop and peeing on/being peed on by others.
OPINION: What's Really In That 'LGBTQ-Themed Book' a Middle School Teacher Was Disciplined Over
An NBC News article about an "LGBTQ-themed book" was curiously light on details about what what actually found inside the book.www.mediaite.com
So, yes, this teacher should either be fired or face charges.
How did the media report it? Headlines:
She Offered an LGBTQ-Themed Book to Her Middle Schoolers. Parents Filed a Police Report
She offered a LGBTQ-themed book to her middle schoolers. Parents filed a police report
“The notion that I was putting children in danger because of books ... I knew I couldn’t go back.”www.today.comIllinois middle school teacher offers LGBTQ book to students, parents call police
Parents file a police report after teacher offers LGBTQ-themed book to her middle schoolers
The articles don’t refer to any of the content that’s in the book. They make the immoral teacher into a poor victim of mean intolerant parents. However, in reality, it was heroic teachers exposing a perverse teacher who is sharing sexual, explicit, inappropriate content with children.
That wasn’t the question I asked.