Teacher will be charged for saying Mohammed was a child molester

You have no idea what you're blabbering about Muzzie appeaser.

Joseph was a pedo I'm thinking and God was a rapist.

I'm thinking you're a muzzie lover and don't have the first clue what the hell you're blabbering about. I also have little interest in your bullshit


What kind of deity goes around raping little girls? Sheesh.

You're just trying to inflame. Have a lovely day, muzzie lover.
Truth is not flaming

The Jewish records of the Rabbis are of extreme importance in determining Gospel origins and the value of the church presentation of the virgin birth story of Jesus Christ. A common appellation for Jesus in the Talmud was Yeshu'a ben Panthera, an allusion to the widespread Jewish belief during the earliest centuries of the Christian era that Jesus was the result of an illegitimate union between his mother and a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Panthera.


The Talmud enshrines within its pages Jewish oral law. It is divided into two parts, the Mishna and the Gemara. The first discusses such subjects as festivals and sacred things. The Gemara, is basically a commentary on these subjects. When the Talmud was written is not known. Some authorities suggest a date of 150-160, around the same time the Christian Gospels began to emerge, while others say 450.


The Talmud writers mentioned Jesus' name twenty times and quite specifically documented that he was born an illegitimate son of a Roman soldier called Panthera, nicknamed the "Panther". Panthera's existence was confirmed by the discovery of a mysterious tombstone at Bingerbrück in Germany. The engraving etched in the headstone read:

Tiberius Julius Abdes Panthera, an archer, native of Sidon, Phoenicia, who in 9AD was transferred to service in Rhineland (Germany). 1

This inscription added fuel to the theory that Jesus was the illegitimate son of Mary and the soldier Panthera. Classical scholar Professor Morton Smith of the Columbia University USA, described the tombstone as possibly `our only genuine relic of the holy family.' 2 In many Jewish references, Jesus was often referred to as 'ben Panthera', 'ben' meaning, 'son of'. However cautious one ought to be in accepting anything about Jesus from Jewish sources, in the matter of Jesus 'ben Panthera', the writers seem more consistent than the men we now call the church fathers.


Scholars, for centuries, have discussed at length why Jesus was so regularly called ben Panthera. Adamantius Origen, an early Christian historian and church father (185-251), recorded the following verses about Mary from the research records of a highly regarded Second Century historian and author named Celsus (c. 178):

Mary was turned out by her husband, a carpenter by profession, after she had been convicted of unfaithfulness. Cut off by her spouse, she gave birth to Jesus, a bastard; that Jesus, on account of his poverty was hired out to go to Egypt; that while there he acquired certain (magical) powers which Egyptians pride themselves on possessing.3

Later, in passage 1:32, Origen supported the Jewish records and confirmed that the paramour of the mother of Jesus was a Roman soldier called Panthera, a name he repeated in verse 1:69. Sometime during the 17th Century, those sentences were erased from the oldest Vatican manuscripts and other codices under church control. 4


The traditional church writings of St Epiphanius, the Bishop of Salamis (315-403) again confirmed the ben Panthera story and his information was of a startling nature. This champion of Christian orthodoxy and saint of Roman Catholicism frankly stated:

Jesus was the son of a certain Julius whose surname was Panthera.5

This was an extraordinary declaration simply recorded in ancient records as accepted church history. The ben Panthera legend was so widespread that two early stalwarts of the Christian church inserted the name in the genealogies of Jesus and Mary as a matter of fact.

JUST WHO WERE THE PARENTS OF JESUS?

Ah, what a surprise, Guano hates Jesus. You'll really do anything to defend your Muslim brothers won't you?
 
You have no idea what you're blabbering about Muzzie appeaser.

Joseph was a pedo I'm thinking and God was a rapist.

I'm thinking you're a muzzie lover and don't have the first clue what the hell you're blabbering about. I also have little interest in your bullshit


What kind of deity goes around raping little girls? Sheesh.

You're just trying to inflame. Have a lovely day, muzzie lover.
Truth is not flaming

The Jewish records of the Rabbis are of extreme importance in determining Gospel origins and the value of the church presentation of the virgin birth story of Jesus Christ. A common appellation for Jesus in the Talmud was Yeshu'a ben Panthera, an allusion to the widespread Jewish belief during the earliest centuries of the Christian era that Jesus was the result of an illegitimate union between his mother and a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Panthera.


The Talmud enshrines within its pages Jewish oral law. It is divided into two parts, the Mishna and the Gemara. The first discusses such subjects as festivals and sacred things. The Gemara, is basically a commentary on these subjects. When the Talmud was written is not known. Some authorities suggest a date of 150-160, around the same time the Christian Gospels began to emerge, while others say 450.


The Talmud writers mentioned Jesus' name twenty times and quite specifically documented that he was born an illegitimate son of a Roman soldier called Panthera, nicknamed the "Panther". Panthera's existence was confirmed by the discovery of a mysterious tombstone at Bingerbrück in Germany. The engraving etched in the headstone read:

Tiberius Julius Abdes Panthera, an archer, native of Sidon, Phoenicia, who in 9AD was transferred to service in Rhineland (Germany). 1

This inscription added fuel to the theory that Jesus was the illegitimate son of Mary and the soldier Panthera. Classical scholar Professor Morton Smith of the Columbia University USA, described the tombstone as possibly `our only genuine relic of the holy family.' 2 In many Jewish references, Jesus was often referred to as 'ben Panthera', 'ben' meaning, 'son of'. However cautious one ought to be in accepting anything about Jesus from Jewish sources, in the matter of Jesus 'ben Panthera', the writers seem more consistent than the men we now call the church fathers.


Scholars, for centuries, have discussed at length why Jesus was so regularly called ben Panthera. Adamantius Origen, an early Christian historian and church father (185-251), recorded the following verses about Mary from the research records of a highly regarded Second Century historian and author named Celsus (c. 178):

Mary was turned out by her husband, a carpenter by profession, after she had been convicted of unfaithfulness. Cut off by her spouse, she gave birth to Jesus, a bastard; that Jesus, on account of his poverty was hired out to go to Egypt; that while there he acquired certain (magical) powers which Egyptians pride themselves on possessing.3

Later, in passage 1:32, Origen supported the Jewish records and confirmed that the paramour of the mother of Jesus was a Roman soldier called Panthera, a name he repeated in verse 1:69. Sometime during the 17th Century, those sentences were erased from the oldest Vatican manuscripts and other codices under church control. 4


The traditional church writings of St Epiphanius, the Bishop of Salamis (315-403) again confirmed the ben Panthera story and his information was of a startling nature. This champion of Christian orthodoxy and saint of Roman Catholicism frankly stated:

Jesus was the son of a certain Julius whose surname was Panthera.5

This was an extraordinary declaration simply recorded in ancient records as accepted church history. The ben Panthera legend was so widespread that two early stalwarts of the Christian church inserted the name in the genealogies of Jesus and Mary as a matter of fact.

JUST WHO WERE THE PARENTS OF JESUS?


That's fascinating...and, makes Jesus all that more an interesting figure.

The thing is, people apply modern concepts of morality and ethics to ancient civilizations. Most of what was written about esteemed religious figures was long after their deaths, including Aisha and Mohammed. The hypocrisy is that one is called "pedophile" despite having married multiple adult women, despite marriageable age being puberty for a young girl and despite the differing accounts as to her age - they focus on one only.

The not so good reality is that there are those who follow the faith that believe that and believe child marriages are ok. They aren't. And there was nothing in Mohammed's words that lead to that. A desire for a "virgin" was imprinted not only in Islam but in Christianity, Judaism, and a multitude of cultures where women were held to a different standard than men.

Yet, somehow - Mohammed gets labeled a pedo, and the Christian God and Joseph get a free pass with a multitude of excuses that are denied to Islam. Go figure.
 
He married a nine year old girl. That's the truth. Calling him a child molester is interpretation at best. Children were married off at very young ages in those times.

The sources I've read indicate that he married her when she was 6 or 7. And 'consummated the marriage' when she was 9.
 
We're supposed to pretend that the people that progressives love aren't child molesters and traffickers and perverts.
 
People all over Europe who speak the truth (negatively) about Islam, are being persecuted and prosecuted.

Maybe because it's not really the truth....kind of like "the truth" about Jews in the 1930's and 40's. We all know where that led.

Aside from that though - I don't think they should be prosecuted. I don't support denying free speech simply because it's hateful. Better to combat in the open.
 
He married a nine year old girl. That's the truth. Calling him a child molester is interpretation at best. Children were married off at very young ages in those times.
Perverted then as is now. Muslims are sick satan worshipers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top