The 1890 Incident at Wounded Knee Was No "Massacre"

mikegriffith1

Mike Griffith
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 23, 2012
6,489
3,649
1,085
Virginia
One of the saddest and most misleading modern revisions of history involves the 1890 incident at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, between the 7th Cavalry and some 200 Indians. Far from being a "massacre," Wounded Knee was a battle in which in the Indians fired first.

If you don't believe any of the accounts of the soldiers and officers who were there, perhaps you will believe the account of Father Francis Craft, who was there serving as an interpreter and who witnessed the entire event.

In the parlance of the day, Father Francis Craft was an "Indian lover." He served as a missionary among the Indians for years. As mentioned, he witnessed the incident because he was there serving as an interpreter. Although his sympathies were strongly with the Indians, so much so that he publicly wished to be buried among them, he made it clear that the Indians started the fighting at Wounded Knee, and he exonerated the soldiers. I will first quote from a letter he wrote that was published in newspapers soon after the battle, and then I will quote from his deposition.

Letter:


I authorize you to contradict for me in my name, through the press, the reports in circulation that blame the army for the sad tragedy at Wounded Knee creek. Those reports do grave injustice to our soldiers, and are instigated by those averse to an honorable settlement to the present trouble, and hostile to the decree of every true friend of the Indian, that they be permanently transferred from the charge of the Indian bureau to the war department. It is only by such a transfer that the Indians can expect just treatment. The whole trouble originated through interested whites [some local settlers and Bureau of Indian Affairs personnel], who had gone about most industriously and misrepresented the army and its movements upon all the agencies [Indian reservations]. The Indians, were in consequence alarmed and suspicious. They had been led to believe that the true aim of the military was their extermination. The troops acted with greatest kindness and prudence. In the Wounded Knee fight the Indians fired first. The troops fired only when compelled to. I was between both, saw all, and know from an absolute knowledge of the whole affair whereof I say. The Indians state the case just [as] I do. I have every proof at hand, and when able will forward full statement and documentary evidence. (Father Francis M. J. Craft – Missionary Wounded in Battle)

Deposition (note that he called Col. Forsyth, the local commander, by his brevet rank of General, a common practice):

REVEREND FRANCIS M. J. CRAFT, Catholic Missionary Priest, being duly sworn, testifies as follows:

I am a missionary priest of the Catholic church, and have worked in that capacity among the Indians of the northwest for the past ten years. I came to Pine Ridge Agency in December, 1890, to visit the Catholic missions and schools as a representative of the Bureau of Catholic Indian Missions, and also to render what service I could in the settlement of the Indian troubles. . . .

In the morning, while the troops were preparing to disarm the Indians, I learned from several Indians with whom I spoke that they had left their agency, alarmed by the reports of the Indians who escaped from Standing Rock after the death of Sitting Bull. The Standing Rock Indians were not with them, but, as they said, left them on the way down, and went toward the Missouri. I saw that the Indians with whom I was speaking were the worst element of their agency, whose camp had for years been the rendezvous of all the worst characters on the Sioux Reservation.

About 8:30 A.M. General Forsyth called all the Indian men from the Indian camp to the point marked on the accompanying map, P, in order to separate them from the women and children. This seemed to be a very necessary precaution, although no trouble was apprehended. General Forsyth then spoke to the men through an interpreter, kindly and pleasantly, and explained the necessity of taking the arms, and assured them that they were perfectly safe in the hands of their old friends, the soldiers, and that starvation and other troubles were now happily at an end. The Indians answered in a way that showed they were pleased. Big Foot and others, however, denied having any guns, saying they had all been burned up.

General Forsyth reminded them, however, that the day before every man was seen to have at least one gun. General Forsyth then began sending the Indians in, a few at a time, to the camp to get their guns. They returned saying they had none. General Forsyth then pointed out to the Indians how plain it was they were deceiving him, and begged them not to compel him to search for the guns, but to have confidence in him and bring them themselves.

A medicine man now began praying, singing and walking around the circle of Indians, his words indicating that the Indians were afraid of what might happen to them when their guns would be taken, and going through various ceremonies that the soldiers' bullets might not hurt them. General Forsyth told him he had nothing to fear, and he was induced to sit down and be quiet.

As the Indians did not care to produce their guns, soldiers were sent to search for them in the Indian camp, but returned with very few. At this moment a soldier saw guns under the Indians' blankets, and informed General Forsyth and Major Whitside. As quietly as possible they directed the Indians to come forward, one by one, from the location marked on the map "P," to those marked "S" and "R," and throw aside their blankets and lay down their arms if they had any. Colonel Forsyth spoke very kindly to them, and said he did not wish himself to take their arms, but would rather they would come forward themselves like men and lay them down.

The Indians began to come forward as directed, one by one, to lay down their arms. Fifteen or twenty guns had been thus collected, when I heard among the soldiers in the positions marked "O" & "U," some one cry out "Look out, look at that," and saw them attempting to fall back to the square surrounding the Indians. I looked toward the Indians in the position marked "P," and saw that some were taking their guns from under their blankets and others were raising them ready to fire. The Indians seemed agitated. . . . I am convinced that the movement came from their fear of what might happen when the guns would be all surrendered, as they saw them being given up one by one. I went up to them and tried to reassure them, but very few listened to me.

It is possible that nothing might have occurred had not one young man, said to be the son of Big Foot, suddenly fired. His shot was followed by many others from the Indians. The soldiers did not fire until they were actually compelled to, and after the Indians had fired many shots.

When the soldiers returned the fire, the Indians broke up into small parties and charged back and forth across the square, firing and trying to break through. Some broke through towards the southwest, and some, I believe, towards the southeast. As they passed the end of the camp, a few women and children ran out and joined them.

The Hotchkiss battery opened on them as they crossed the agency road. It is possible that by this fire some women and children were killed. If so, the killing was unavoidable, as the soldiers could hardly have distinguished them from the men among whom they were, who were firing backwards as they ran. Many concealed themselves in the ravine. This ended the main battle, which lasted from one half to three-quarters of an hour. After all was over at least two shots were fired from the Indian camp "C," but the soldiers did not reply to them.

I was wounded early in the fight, but kept up until everything was over, and attended to the dying. After I finally gave out I was carried to the field hospital "J." I heard a volley of rifle shots fired from the Indian camp "C." No shots were fired by the soldiers for some minutes, but I heard some one shouting in "Dakota" as if an interpreter was speaking. The rifle shots from the camp continued and the Hotchkiss battery shelled the camp, and also the tents at "K" and "M," from which Indians were firing upon the soldiers.

I afterwards learned that contrary to their usual custom of protecting their women and children from danger, and of respecting the white flag, which they had hoisted over their camp, these Indians had actually managed to get back to their camp and fired from it upon the soldiers. If women and children were killed in the shelling of this camp, the Indians who caused it are to blame. I have heard this act of these Indians severely condemned by Brules and Ogalalas, who denounced them as murderers of the women and children, and exonerated the soldiers. (Father Francis M. J. Craft – Missionary Wounded in Battle)


Those who paint the battle as a massacre sometimes quote a few carefully chosen statements made by General Nathan Miles. However, although General Miles believed that the local commander, Col. Forsyth, had provoked the incident by badly mishandling the disarming of the Indians, he never claimed the incident was a massacre, and he approved medals for some of the soldiers who fought in the battle (Setting the Record Straight Regarding ‘Remove the Stain Act’).
 
Oh so you support the genocide of my ancestors? The seventh Calvary herded them like buffalo and killed the innocents. I suggest giving this song a listen from their point of view.

 
Col. Forsyth, had provoked the incident by badly mishandling the disarming of the Indians.............

An act of war. Wouldn't you agree?
 
One of the saddest and most misleading modern revisions of history involves the 1890 incident at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, between the 7th Cavalry and some 200 Indians. Far from being a "massacre," Wounded Knee was a battle in which in the Indians fired first.

If you don't believe any of the accounts of the soldiers and officers who were there, perhaps you will believe the account of Father Francis Craft, who was there serving as an interpreter and who witnessed the entire event.

In the parlance of the day, Father Francis Craft was an "Indian lover." He served as a missionary among the Indians for years. As mentioned, he witnessed the incident because he was there serving as an interpreter. Although his sympathies were strongly with the Indians, so much so that he publicly wished to be buried among them, he made it clear that the Indians started the fighting at Wounded Knee, and he exonerated the soldiers. I will first quote from a letter he wrote that was published in newspapers soon after the battle, and then I will quote from his deposition.

Letter:


I authorize you to contradict for me in my name, through the press, the reports in circulation that blame the army for the sad tragedy at Wounded Knee creek. Those reports do grave injustice to our soldiers, and are instigated by those averse to an honorable settlement to the present trouble, and hostile to the decree of every true friend of the Indian, that they be permanently transferred from the charge of the Indian bureau to the war department. It is only by such a transfer that the Indians can expect just treatment. The whole trouble originated through interested whites [some local settlers and Bureau of Indian Affairs personnel], who had gone about most industriously and misrepresented the army and its movements upon all the agencies [Indian reservations]. The Indians, were in consequence alarmed and suspicious. They had been led to believe that the true aim of the military was their extermination. The troops acted with greatest kindness and prudence. In the Wounded Knee fight the Indians fired first. The troops fired only when compelled to. I was between both, saw all, and know from an absolute knowledge of the whole affair whereof I say. The Indians state the case just [as] I do. I have every proof at hand, and when able will forward full statement and documentary evidence. (Father Francis M. J. Craft – Missionary Wounded in Battle)

Deposition (note that he called Col. Forsyth, the local commander, by his brevet rank of General, a common practice):

REVEREND FRANCIS M. J. CRAFT, Catholic Missionary Priest, being duly sworn, testifies as follows:

I am a missionary priest of the Catholic church, and have worked in that capacity among the Indians of the northwest for the past ten years. I came to Pine Ridge Agency in December, 1890, to visit the Catholic missions and schools as a representative of the Bureau of Catholic Indian Missions, and also to render what service I could in the settlement of the Indian troubles. . . .

In the morning, while the troops were preparing to disarm the Indians, I learned from several Indians with whom I spoke that they had left their agency, alarmed by the reports of the Indians who escaped from Standing Rock after the death of Sitting Bull. The Standing Rock Indians were not with them, but, as they said, left them on the way down, and went toward the Missouri. I saw that the Indians with whom I was speaking were the worst element of their agency, whose camp had for years been the rendezvous of all the worst characters on the Sioux Reservation.

About 8:30 A.M. General Forsyth called all the Indian men from the Indian camp to the point marked on the accompanying map, P, in order to separate them from the women and children. This seemed to be a very necessary precaution, although no trouble was apprehended. General Forsyth then spoke to the men through an interpreter, kindly and pleasantly, and explained the necessity of taking the arms, and assured them that they were perfectly safe in the hands of their old friends, the soldiers, and that starvation and other troubles were now happily at an end. The Indians answered in a way that showed they were pleased. Big Foot and others, however, denied having any guns, saying they had all been burned up.

General Forsyth reminded them, however, that the day before every man was seen to have at least one gun. General Forsyth then began sending the Indians in, a few at a time, to the camp to get their guns. They returned saying they had none. General Forsyth then pointed out to the Indians how plain it was they were deceiving him, and begged them not to compel him to search for the guns, but to have confidence in him and bring them themselves.

A medicine man now began praying, singing and walking around the circle of Indians, his words indicating that the Indians were afraid of what might happen to them when their guns would be taken, and going through various ceremonies that the soldiers' bullets might not hurt them. General Forsyth told him he had nothing to fear, and he was induced to sit down and be quiet.

As the Indians did not care to produce their guns, soldiers were sent to search for them in the Indian camp, but returned with very few. At this moment a soldier saw guns under the Indians' blankets, and informed General Forsyth and Major Whitside. As quietly as possible they directed the Indians to come forward, one by one, from the location marked on the map "P," to those marked "S" and "R," and throw aside their blankets and lay down their arms if they had any. Colonel Forsyth spoke very kindly to them, and said he did not wish himself to take their arms, but would rather they would come forward themselves like men and lay them down.

The Indians began to come forward as directed, one by one, to lay down their arms. Fifteen or twenty guns had been thus collected, when I heard among the soldiers in the positions marked "O" & "U," some one cry out "Look out, look at that," and saw them attempting to fall back to the square surrounding the Indians. I looked toward the Indians in the position marked "P," and saw that some were taking their guns from under their blankets and others were raising them ready to fire. The Indians seemed agitated. . . . I am convinced that the movement came from their fear of what might happen when the guns would be all surrendered, as they saw them being given up one by one. I went up to them and tried to reassure them, but very few listened to me.

It is possible that nothing might have occurred had not one young man, said to be the son of Big Foot, suddenly fired. His shot was followed by many others from the Indians. The soldiers did not fire until they were actually compelled to, and after the Indians had fired many shots.

When the soldiers returned the fire, the Indians broke up into small parties and charged back and forth across the square, firing and trying to break through. Some broke through towards the southwest, and some, I believe, towards the southeast. As they passed the end of the camp, a few women and children ran out and joined them.

The Hotchkiss battery opened on them as they crossed the agency road. It is possible that by this fire some women and children were killed. If so, the killing was unavoidable, as the soldiers could hardly have distinguished them from the men among whom they were, who were firing backwards as they ran. Many concealed themselves in the ravine. This ended the main battle, which lasted from one half to three-quarters of an hour. After all was over at least two shots were fired from the Indian camp "C," but the soldiers did not reply to them.

I was wounded early in the fight, but kept up until everything was over, and attended to the dying. After I finally gave out I was carried to the field hospital "J." I heard a volley of rifle shots fired from the Indian camp "C." No shots were fired by the soldiers for some minutes, but I heard some one shouting in "Dakota" as if an interpreter was speaking. The rifle shots from the camp continued and the Hotchkiss battery shelled the camp, and also the tents at "K" and "M," from which Indians were firing upon the soldiers.

I afterwards learned that contrary to their usual custom of protecting their women and children from danger, and of respecting the white flag, which they had hoisted over their camp, these Indians had actually managed to get back to their camp and fired from it upon the soldiers. If women and children were killed in the shelling of this camp, the Indians who caused it are to blame. I have heard this act of these Indians severely condemned by Brules and Ogalalas, who denounced them as murderers of the women and children, and exonerated the soldiers. (Father Francis M. J. Craft – Missionary Wounded in Battle)


Those who paint the battle as a massacre sometimes quote a few carefully chosen statements made by General Nathan Miles. However, although General Miles believed that the local commander, Col. Forsyth, had provoked the incident by badly mishandling the disarming of the Indians, he never claimed the incident was a massacre, and he approved medals for some of the soldiers who fought in the battle (Setting the Record Straight Regarding ‘Remove the Stain Act’).

True history is often obscured by those who cry the loudest.
 
Col. Forsyth, had provoked the incident by badly mishandling the disarming of the Indians.............

An act of war. Wouldn't you agree?
If you had bothered to read any of the links, you would have learned that the Indians were being disarmed because fanatical hotheads among them were trying to provoke conflict with the local Army unit.

If you had bothered to read the links, you would have also learned that Col. Forsyth actually did not mishandle the weapons search and seizure. Gen. Miles badly jumped to conclusions on this and refused to admit his error even after his own investigators cleared Col. Forsyth.

DakotaKai_fan20:

Oh so you support the genocide of my ancestors? The seventh Calvary herded them like buffalo and killed the innocents. I suggest giving this song a listen from their point of view.

Wow, did you even bother to read Father Craft's accounts of the incident? You cite some song and ignore two accounts from a very pro-Indian source who saw the entire event unfold?
 
If you had bothered to read any of the links, you would have learned that the Indians were being disarmed because fanatical hotheads among them were trying to provoke conflict with the local Army unit.

If you had bothered to read the links, you would have also learned that Col. Forsyth actually did not mishandle the weapons search and seizure. Gen. Miles badly jumped to conclusions on this and refused to admit his error even after his own investigators cleared Col. Forsyth.



Wow, did you even bother to read Father Craft's accounts of the incident? You cite some song and ignore two accounts from a very pro-Indian source who saw the entire event unfold?

Well there goes the notion of the "noble savage." :laughing0301:
 
If you had bothered to read any of the links, you would have learned that the Indians were being disarmed because fanatical hotheads among them were trying to provoke conflict with the local Army unit.

I find this an unsatisfying explanation.
  1. The army was on their land.
  2. The army slaughtered all their buffalo to starve the Indians into nonexistence.
  3. The US government drew up treaties the Indians couldn't read then read them to the Indians lying about what was in them. Then held them to the terms.
  4. The army continually violated their own treaties, such as when after signing land over to the Indians they later found gold or something valuable there.
So is it any wonder then that there were some pissed off Indians?
 
Your "Father Francis" has no knowledge of the genocide.
I corrected that to Father Craft seconds after posting the reply. You must have replied almost as soon as I posted the first version of the reply.

Did you read Father Craft's accounts of the incident?

I suggest you read this:
You're going to have to do a whole lot better than to cite some Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article, like most Wikipedia stuff, is rather one-sided and incomplete. However, as bad as it is, it is not as bad as some Native American articles on the battle.

I suspect you'll never be able to bring yourself to read them, but here are some additional links on the incident, links that provide a wealth of information omitted from the Wikipedia piece:







 
I find this an unsatisfying explanation.
  1. The army was on their land.
  2. The army slaughtered all their buffalo to starve the Indians into nonexistence.
  3. The US government drew up treaties the Indians couldn't read then read them to the Indians lying about what was in them. Then held them to the terms.
  4. The army continually violated their own treaties, such as when after signing land over to the Indians they later found gold or something valuable there.
So is it any wonder then that there were some pissed off Indians?
Yet there are people who refuse to know about the genocide of my Native ancestors.
 

Forum List

Back
Top