I didn't.that doesn't say what you claimed it says.
Post # 147
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I didn't.that doesn't say what you claimed it says.
/——/ You’re getting more absurd with every post. I think you’re just looking for much needed attention. Run along and play with your friends."Owning stock is owning part of the company and that includes the building and property".
Wrong. With no receipts you have NO proof you ever paid that money. Meaning the accuser WINS. Your pathetic excuses for this criminal Willis are laughable.Nobodies required to keep a paper trail of personal expenses. The burden of proof is on the accusers.
WW
No retard. The bank testified to the fact that THEY filled out the paperwork using THEIR numbers. No fraud. Period. You lose. As always. Enjoy this decision getting tossed out completely on appeal (as the appeals court has pretty much indicated will happen).Not according to the judge.
I win.
/----/ Tell that to the IRS if you deduct personal expenses.Nobodies required to keep a paper trail of personal expenses. The burden of proof is on the accusers.
WW
It doesnt. The question being asked is whether SHE has violated the law and should be removed. Whether or not that will draw into question the entire investigation will happen once the determination of her malfeasance is made.I am wondering what this has to do with the Georgia case against Trump and others.
I havent been following it closely so I might have missed something.
But she had an affair with a colleague on the case. That is not unusual in any walk of life. It seems that there are questions about some receipts.
But how does it impact on the case against trump. Ms Willis has already scalped several of the conspirators in this case. It doesnt look good for those who are still standing.
If she is brought down surely someone else would take up the case and see it to its conclusion ?
That is what would happen in a civilised country that is run by the rule of law.
I cant see a link between Ms Willis and the case against trump. It seems to be clutching at strawx.
Trump DA Fani Willis fights back on the stand in Georgia election interference case: 'I'm not on trial.'
Fani Willis took the stand Thursday, testifying about her relationship with Nathan Wade, the lead lawyer in Trump's Georgia election interference case.uk.news.yahoo.com
/----/ Tell that to the IRS if you deduct personal expenses.
/-----/ As opposed to your business expenses. Try doing so without retaining receipts. DERPCould you explain "deduct personal expenses".
Since when can you deduct a personal expense for a vacation in Napa Valley or Belize?
(Now if you are deducting business travel, that is a different animal.)
\WW
/——/ You know nothing. Owning stock is owning part of the company and that includes the building and property. Stop embarrassing yourself.
/-----/ As opposed to your business expenses. Try doing so without retaining receipts. DERP
15 Common Tax Write-Offs You Can Claim On Your Next Return
Taxpayers can take advantage of numerous deductions and credits on their taxes each year that can help them pay a lower amount of taxes—or receive a refund from the IRS. You may be able to claim the following 15 common write-offs, which include both tax credits and deductions. Additionally, you mwww.forbes.com
/-----/ You're funnier than the original Saturday Night Live.You're the one who is embarrassing himself. Your comments on economic matters reveal your complete ignorance of the topic.
Stock transfers are a miniscule percentage of international funds transfers. Most EFT's are payments for goods or services. Nothing more, nothing less.
/----/Ah got ya, I through you were saying they were trying to deduct the vacations for tax purposes without receipts.
None of those in the link are vacations.
Well, since personal vacations are not tax deductible, they don't apply to personal deductions for IRS purposes, therefore no receipts required. But I agree, if you are going to claim something against Taxes, you should have a receipt. (He says glancing at his 4-drawer cabinet with folders for over 30 years worth of tax filings.)
WW
I did that, until my accountant said to chuck them after 10 years. The IRS can't or won't go back any further. Unless, of course, those are business records that you need to refer to.(He says glancing at his 4-drawer cabinet with folders for over 30 years worth of tax filings.)
And what was the legally binding ruling by the judge after the testimony?No retard. The bank testified to the fact that THEY filled out the paperwork using THEIR numbers. No fraud. Period. You lose. As always. Enjoy this decision getting tossed out completely on appeal (as the appeals court has pretty much indicated will happen).
What will the appeal be you TDS suffering loon? The BANK EMPLOYEES stated the opposite of what James and this moron judge stated. This gets totally tossed, Willis is toast (and so is that frivolous case) and Fat Alvin will go down in Flames. Stock up on tissues.And what was the legally binding ruling by the judge after the testimony?
YOUR
BLOB
LOST
LOL...What will the appeal be you TDS suffering loon? The BANK EMPLOYEES stated the opposite of what James and this moron judge stated. This gets totally tossed, Willis is toast (and so is that frivolous case) and Fat Alvin will go down in Flames. Stock up on tissues.
How’d that one go?Dominion won’t ever file any lawsuit. This little thing called discovery. More big talk and no action.
/----/
I did that, until my accountant said to chuck them after 10 years. The IRS can't or won't go back any further. Unless, of course, those are business records that you need to refer to.
Fani Willis has been disqualified and removed from the trial:I am wondering what this has to do with the Georgia case against Trump and others.
I havent been following it closely so I might have missed something.
But she had an affair with a colleague on the case. That is not unusual in any walk of life. It seems that there are questions about some receipts.
But how does it impact on the case against trump. Ms Willis has already scalped several of the conspirators in this case. It doesnt look good for those who are still standing.
If she is brought down surely someone else would take up the case and see it to its conclusion ?
That is what would happen in a civilised country that is run by the rule of law.
I cant see a link between Ms Willis and the case against trump. It seems to be clutching at strawx.
Trump DA Fani Willis fights back on the stand in Georgia election interference case: 'I'm not on trial.'
Fani Willis took the stand Thursday, testifying about her relationship with Nathan Wade, the lead lawyer in Trump's Georgia election interference case.uk.news.yahoo.com
/——/ I worked for CCH that sold software that accounted for splits in seconds.(Tax record drawer is all personal.)
Ya I know, I also have electronic copies on two different hard drives.
But my wife got screwed over in the late 80's when she was told by a tax preparer that she didn't need to keep some stock statements over three years. She was given $1000 in AT&T when she graduated High School, before Ma Bell was broken up into the Baby Bells. Now it would be either:
WW
- Sell all the split stocks and pay capital gains on all of it. (My preferred option.)
- Hire someone to research the original stock, then ever split and merger that has occurred since. (Not a very good option as the research cost would be more then the capital gains taxes.)
- Just hold them until we pass then have them go to the kids which will rebase the cost basis for them. (They will pass an part of the estate as inheritance tax free, unless we win the PowerBall lottery in the next 20-30 years.) (He preferred option.)
/——/ Total bullshyt ruling that will be overturned because it destroys the NY real estate business.And what was the legally binding ruling by the judge after the testimony?
YOUR
BLOB
LOST
...}You know nothing. Owning stock is owning part of the company and that includes the building and property. Stop embarrassing yourself.