- Thread starter
- #41
I'm sure you have added a great deal of knowledge between '99 and 2011...
...you and the other "we."
So that I might better be able to address you, would you identify yourself as neuroscientist, neurologist, neurosurgeon, or psychiatrist in research, academic, or clinical setting?
brain development research 2000-2011 - Google Scholar
Here you go. Happy reading! Apparently, at the PC household, science stopped in 1999.
Get back to me when you've done a little more research on the subject, because I really don't feel obligated to cover 12 years of research that you haven't done in this format.
ktkxbai.
1. So happy to see that you have a degree in "Google"...would have been fine if it answered the question....
2. Now, if you only had the capacity to understand plain language!
Wow! You'd be a real threat then!
3. The query was the following...
"And, consistent with those insights and added knowledge, could you elucidate the answer to the point that Sir John Maddox made:
"...thinking involves the consideration of alternative responses, many of which have not been experienced but have been merely imagined."
You can explain that, can't you...
...or, are you merely a wind-bag?"
Were there any words in the above with which you are having trouble...'cause I'd be happy to explain them to you...
...your Google-list had nothing to do with the above.
4. Let's review: you dismissed the OP, with
"We actually have a fairly clear understanding of how the mind functions, and we learn more every year."
I've questioned your pompous use of "we" in the above....but you have blithely wandered away from that question. I understand your embarrassment.
Since you are unable to show that Maddox's question- from 1999- has been answered, you now pretend that the Google hodge-podge responds to it....which it doesn't
So, a new question arises: are you dishonest, or simply a dolt?
I think you are honest...which leaves but one choice.
5. "Get back to me when you've done a little more research on the subject, because I really don't feel obligated to cover 12 years of research that you haven't done in this format."
Now, this is the winner in the category of "Unintentional Humor."
And...if I may ask....I was wondering if you would verify the rumor that you produce your own makeup from recycled medical wastes, mostly blood and bile?
6. Now, another serious question.
Since you clearly found some interest in the OP, in the topic relating science and faith, why did you choose to amble down the snarky path?
You see how that decision has come to bite you where you recline, and certainly didn't make you appear either smart or honest....
...why didn't you simply put forth a cogent view...as I see you were half-heartedly prepared to do?