The disgrace of the Lame Stream Media and how they create FAKE news.

[Mikeoxenormous]

Violence breaks out at pro-Trump rally in Berkeley

For the second time in a month, Berkeley was the scene of violent demonstrations as supporters of President Trump clashed with counter-protesters Saturday on the streets of the city.

Notice how they say Pro Trump clashed with counter-protesters. Now read deep into the story and the REAL news happens.

The Trump supporters marched several blocks but were met by a group of counter-demonstrators, and fights began breaking out, according to Matthai Chakko, a spokesman for the city of Berkeley.

Videos and photos posted on Twitter showed people punching each other and pulling their hair, with one man using an unidentified object to beat another person. Several people in the crowd were pepper-sprayed, including an elderly man.

At least two people, with their faces covered up, could be seen on video trying to set fire to an American flag, while a photo on Twitter showed the bloody face of a man who wore a T-shirt that said "Trump is My President."

Amy Leona Masker, a 23-year-old student from Las Positas College in Livermore who was on crutches, was among the counter-demonstrators. She and a fellow student were standing together when they saw the fighting break out.

"These crutches came in handy when people started shoving," Masker said.

So here was a group of people wanting to exercise their 1st amendment rights and the thugs of the LEFT came in and instigated a fight and the LSM wrote Trump supporters clashing with counter-protestors. If the counter protestors never showed up and allowed the Trump supporters to walk, this never would of happened. Just goes to show, that the picture below is so true.

So, if the anti-Trump protesters had stayed homer, the Trump supporters would not ave had to start fights with them.

BTW, we shout racism bigot hate mongers at Trump & his supporters because you are racists, bigots & hate mongers. It has nothing to do with policy. It has to do with people like you & your orange buddy.

Have you swung your purse at them yet Davey dear?

If you think my non support of your orange cheeto makes me a sissy, why don't you come over & find the fuck out. You think you asshole Trumpettes are the only ones that own guns? Come on,. Break into my home. Find out, coward POS.

I have news, being a uneducated white guy does not make you tough. It makes you stupid.

You don't have to worry about me Dave, since I am a law abiding citizen. but you do have to worry about those who are going around beating on women, people of color attacking whites, and those that Obama(the brown turd) has allowed to leave prison out of Obama's liberal compassion.

‘Non-violent’ Criminal Released Early by Obama Kills Woman, 2 Children

Sadly, the day he was released on Obama’s “good behavior” program, he went home to stab a woman and her two children multiple times before fleeing the scene. He was apprehended and charged with a “triple murder.”

As it is said, liberal compassion kills people....

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

View attachment 115713

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

You left out the Bush recession starting 4th quarter of 2007.

that was Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, and Bill Clinton, but you are too stupid to know who really caused that recession.... Your lacking of brain matter, is typical of anyone on the left...

25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis - TIME

Among his biggest strokes of free-wheeling capitalism was the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, a cornerstone of Depression-era regulation. He also signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which exempted credit-default swaps from regulation. In 1995 Clinton loosened housing rules by rewriting the Community Reinvestment Act, which put added pressure on banks to lend in low-income neighborhoods.

Yes Dave, you are stupid.... And don't forget this...

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Violence breaks out at pro-Trump rally in Berkeley

For the second time in a month, Berkeley was the scene of violent demonstrations as supporters of President Trump clashed with counter-protesters Saturday on the streets of the city.

Notice how they say Pro Trump clashed with counter-protesters. Now read deep into the story and the REAL news happens.

The Trump supporters marched several blocks but were met by a group of counter-demonstrators, and fights began breaking out, according to Matthai Chakko, a spokesman for the city of Berkeley.

Videos and photos posted on Twitter showed people punching each other and pulling their hair, with one man using an unidentified object to beat another person. Several people in the crowd were pepper-sprayed, including an elderly man.

At least two people, with their faces covered up, could be seen on video trying to set fire to an American flag, while a photo on Twitter showed the bloody face of a man who wore a T-shirt that said "Trump is My President."

Amy Leona Masker, a 23-year-old student from Las Positas College in Livermore who was on crutches, was among the counter-demonstrators. She and a fellow student were standing together when they saw the fighting break out.

"These crutches came in handy when people started shoving," Masker said.

So here was a group of people wanting to exercise their 1st amendment rights and the thugs of the LEFT came in and instigated a fight and the LSM wrote Trump supporters clashing with counter-protestors. If the counter protestors never showed up and allowed the Trump supporters to walk, this never would of happened. Just goes to show, that the picture below is so true.

So, if the anti-Trump protesters had stayed homer, the Trump supporters would not ave had to start fights with them.

BTW, we shout racism bigot hate mongers at Trump & his supporters because you are racists, bigots & hate mongers. It has nothing to do with policy. It has to do with people like you & your orange buddy.

Have you swung your purse at them yet Davey dear?

If you think my non support of your orange cheeto makes me a sissy, why don't you come over & find the fuck out. You think you asshole Trumpettes are the only ones that own guns? Come on,. Break into my home. Find out, coward POS.

I have news, being a uneducated white guy does not make you tough. It makes you stupid.

Uh no; that would be feral behavior.


But I could slap you around out in the street.


I think you are a wussy because it shows.

But I will continue to minimize my taxes and find Have Blue income streams

 

[miketx]

Violence breaks out at pro-Trump rally in Berkeley

For the second time in a month, Berkeley was the scene of violent demonstrations as supporters of President Trump clashed with counter-protesters Saturday on the streets of the city.

Notice how they say Pro Trump clashed with counter-protesters. Now read deep into the story and the REAL news happens.

The Trump supporters marched several blocks but were met by a group of counter-demonstrators, and fights began breaking out, according to Matthai Chakko, a spokesman for the city of Berkeley.

Videos and photos posted on Twitter showed people punching each other and pulling their hair, with one man using an unidentified object to beat another person. Several people in the crowd were pepper-sprayed, including an elderly man.

At least two people, with their faces covered up, could be seen on video trying to set fire to an American flag, while a photo on Twitter showed the bloody face of a man who wore a T-shirt that said "Trump is My President."

Amy Leona Masker, a 23-year-old student from Las Positas College in Livermore who was on crutches, was among the counter-demonstrators. She and a fellow student were standing together when they saw the fighting break out.

"These crutches came in handy when people started shoving," Masker said.

So here was a group of people wanting to exercise their 1st amendment rights and the thugs of the LEFT came in and instigated a fight and the LSM wrote Trump supporters clashing with counter-protestors. If the counter protestors never showed up and allowed the Trump supporters to walk, this never would of happened. Just goes to show, that the picture below is so true.

So, if the anti-Trump protesters had stayed homer, the Trump supporters would not ave had to start fights with them.

BTW, we shout racism bigot hate mongers at Trump & his supporters because you are racists, bigots & hate mongers. It has nothing to do with policy. It has to do with people like you & your orange buddy.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/9a/7d/b9/9a7db92ef0765b5ecc0b0a55914d4fe6.jpg

You play the race card well.

 

[pinqy]

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

 

[Iceweasel]

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

 

[Iceweasel]

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers. The economy crashed for many reasons so it's disingenuous to pin the numbers on Bush.

Bush had been President for 7 1/2v tears & the Republicans had basically run Congress for 14 years but hey, its not their fault. Nooooooooooooooooooo.

Two quagmire wars
Slashing of revenues
massive unfunded expansion to Medicare
Deregulation
Ending Glass Steagal
etc etc etyc

Obama put us 10 trillion in debt but Bush's 3 trillion was the problem? You have no mind left. It's owned by your masters.

 

[pinqy]

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush got hammered for 5% because that was the rate going UP...which is bad. Obama was praised for 5% because the rate was going DOWN...which is good.
What do you think is wrong with that?

 

[Iceweasel]

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush got hammered for 5% because that was the rate going UP...which is bad. Obama was praised for 5% because the rate was going DOWN...which is good.
What do you think is wrong with that?

Spin. You has it. Next you'll tell us 10 trillion in debt by Obama was better for the economy than the 3 trillion for Bush. I.2% gdp growth for how long? Never over 3%. Where was the criticism? You're a groupie.

 

[pinqy]

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush got hammered for 5% because that was the rate going UP...which is bad. Obama was praised for 5% because the rate was going DOWN...which is good.
What do you think is wrong with that?

Spin. You has it.

That's just saying it is wrong, not WHY. I'm sure you don't actually think that the direction doesn't matter.

Next you'll tell us 10 trillion in debt by Obama was better for the economy than the 3 trillion for Bush. I.2% gdp growth for how long? Never over 3%. Where was the criticism? You're a groupie.

Actually, the GDP did go over 3% a few times....just not over-the-year average. As for the debt, I have no opinion because I have done no research.
I'll remind you I didn't vote for G.W. Bush (I voted for his dad, though) or Obama.

 

[Iceweasel]

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush got hammered for 5% because that was the rate going UP...which is bad. Obama was praised for 5% because the rate was going DOWN...which is good.
What do you think is wrong with that?

Spin. You has it.

That's just saying it is wrong, not WHY. I'm sure you don't actually think that the direction doesn't matter.

Next you'll tell us 10 trillion in debt by Obama was better for the economy than the 3 trillion for Bush. I.2% gdp growth for how long? Never over 3%. Where was the criticism? You're a groupie.

Actually, the GDP did go over 3% a few times....just not over-the-year average. As for the debt, I have no opinion because I have done no research.
I'll remind you I didn't vote for G.W. Bush (I voted for his dad, though) or Obama.

The numbers were made a big deal of, I heard it with my own ears. Bush was hammered long before the crash so you're just spinning. What do you claim Obama did for a decrease in unemployment?

 

[Uncensored2008]

So, if the anti-Trump protesters had stayed homer, the Trump supporters would not ave had to start fights with them.

If you Brown Shirts had stayed home. the Trump supporters would have been afforded civil rights. You fascist democrats would rather die than allow freedom of speech and freedom to assemble.

BTW, we shout racism bigot hate mongers at Trump & his supporters because you are racists, bigots & hate mongers. It has nothing to do with policy. It has to do with people like you & your orange buddy.

It has to do with your Fuhrer, and the utter hatred you fascist democrats have for civil rights.

"I may not like what you have to say, but I will fight to the death to ensure your right to say it." - Voltaire.

"I don't like what you want to say, so I will fight to your death to silence you." - democratic party motto.

 

[RealDave]

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers. The economy crashed for many reasons so it's disingenuous to pin the numbers on Bush.

Bush had been President for 7 1/2v tears & the Republicans had basically run Congress for 14 years but hey, its not their fault. Nooooooooooooooooooo.

Two quagmire wars
Slashing of revenues
massive unfunded expansion to Medicare
Deregulation
Ending Glass Steagal
etc etc etyc

Obama put us 10 trillion in debt but Bush's 3 trillion was the problem? You have no mind left. It's owned by your masters.

The idea you think Bush only contributed 3 Trillion is further proof what a fucking moron you really are.

 

[RealDave]

Looks like we're pretty much at a point where partisans are only going to believe "news" they like.

I guess it was inevitable.
.

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush never got hammered for 5%. He got hammered for his recession.

 

[RealDave]

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush got hammered for 5% because that was the rate going UP...which is bad. Obama was praised for 5% because the rate was going DOWN...which is good.
What do you think is wrong with that?

Spin. You has it.

That's just saying it is wrong, not WHY. I'm sure you don't actually think that the direction doesn't matter.

Next you'll tell us 10 trillion in debt by Obama was better for the economy than the 3 trillion for Bush. I.2% gdp growth for how long? Never over 3%. Where was the criticism? You're a groupie.

Actually, the GDP did go over 3% a few times....just not over-the-year average. As for the debt, I have no opinion because I have done no research.
I'll remind you I didn't vote for G.W. Bush (I voted for his dad, though) or Obama.

The numbers were made a big deal of, I heard it with my own ears. Bush was hammered long before the crash so you're just spinning. What do you claim Obama did for a decrease in unemployment?

He was hammered on the debt. Nio one hammered him because of a 5% unemploiytment rate.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Liberalism and conservatism aren't political parties. They are ideologies. The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it. And his numbers were faked to look good at that.

From 1997 to the end of 2000, the average Unemployment rate was under 5%. In May 2001 it was down to 4.1%. And then it went up. Is 5% a good UE rate when it was 4.1% 5 months earlier and had been under 5% for the last 4 years?
By 2005 it dropped below 5% again and in both 2006 and 2007 it averaged 4.6%. Then it jumped up again, reaching 8.5% in January 2009, Bush's last month.

Under Obama, the average was 9.3% in 2009, 9.6% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011, 8.1% in 2012, 7.4% in 2013, and 6.2% in 2014, finally getting to 5% in 2015.

So....4 years below 5% goes up to 5%. = bad.
6 years above 5%, goes down to 5% = good.

Any objections?

Of course. We've never had so many unemployed, many have given up and aren't even counted in Obama's phony numbers.

Oh? Here's a chart of the unemployment level and the unemployment level PLUS discouraged (defined as wants a job, looked for work in past year but not past 4 weeks, and quit looking because believed no jobs available). It's quite clear that it is not the highest ever:

Obama was president, where was the outrage?

"The left wing has been faking news for a long time, not sure where you've been. Bush got hammered for 5% unemployment, Obama was praised for it."

Bush never got hammered for 5%. He got hammered for his recession.

Bush got hammered just for breathing. The Washington Nationals went so far as to replace their W logo with DC because the W was too reminiscent of W Bush. How's that for Democrat fascism?
(the joke was on the Dems as the DC just stood for Dick Cheney )