The Election: An Analysis

[Jay Zepher]

The democrats put up a good, solid diversion, but despite the sleight of hand, or democrat smokescreen, Kamala was NEVER going to win this election. Why?

Well, First, let’s address the elephant in the room: the US ECONOMY!

Utterly F#&$ amazing that the party that came up with the slogan “It’s the economy, stupid” ignored, lied, or kept silent about the economy throughout Kamala’s campaign!!!

The word “ECONOMY” should’ve been constantly on her lips. But then again, how can you do that when there’s nothing to brag about. So, it was basically a lose/lose situation for her to begin with.

Bread & butter/food on the plate is always the #1 issue in any time, in any situation, in any nation! You’d think that any candidate would know that lesson. It’s right up there with don’t alienate the military and police.

NO Vice President of a party in power, with one exception, has ever won an election in a period of economic slowdown or recession. The first George Bush accomplished that because despite the ‘87 stock market crash the economy was still pretty strong during the ’88 election and people wanted a continuation of the Reagan era.

Otherwise, a slow economy is a killer to any party seeking reelection. No disrespect to Trump’s accomplishment, but Mickey Mouse could’ve beat Kamala if he was a republican. It’s incredible that she was still able to get the votes that she did, given the circumstances. In any other time, this would’ve been a complete blow out! I would’ve not expected her to get any more than one or two states and perhaps not as much as 15 to 30 electoral votes, but she got more in this election because unlike any other previous US election she had on her side an unapologetically biased and overworked propaganda machine that included all the liberal media, endorsements, and contributions that amounted to over a billion dollars. And of course, she still lost.

Again, she was always going to lose this election.

Second point: all the attacks on Trump had just the opposite effect. If someone tells you they are being targeted, and you see that they are targeted – guess what? You’re going to believe they are targeted, and that’s what the American public believed. In their zealousness to convict Trump the liberal establishment made him a martyr, which very nearly resulted in him becoming a dead martyr.

After that would-be assassin’s missed shot, Trump had the election all wrapped up. The juxtaposition of endless court dates, accusations of fascism by liberal leaders, and the attempted assassination plot made it all apparent that Trump and conservative republicans were right in claiming that Trump was being unfairly targeted.

Even if you weren’t a conservative republic, even if you were a moderate, you could not help but see that making Trump a target was not right, not just, and you want to help the guy being targeted, if only to send a message to those doing the targeting. Especially if that guy actually took a bullet and still fought on.

Third point: Trump and the republicans won the election not just because of the economy, but because of the other big elephant standing not only in the room, but knocking the room right off the map, destroying its boundaries – that’s right, the BORDER CRISIS! You really must wonder what the democrats were thinking with this one.

But it’s beyond explanation. Historically, nations without borders have disappeared from history. Is this what the democrats want after all?

There are many other issues that effected the election: WOKE, CRIME, DEI, TRANSGENDER ISSUES, among the many cultural issues.

In other words, Americans said ENOUGH!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Republicans totally shellacked the Democrats.

Analysis done. The left was rejected

 

[1srelluc]

They should have listened to that old white man.....James Carville.

 

[Independent thinker]

The democrats put up a good, solid diversion, but despite the sleight of hand, or democrat smokescreen, Kamala was NEVER going to win this election. Why?

Well, First, let’s address the elephant in the room: the US ECONOMY!

Utterly F#&$ amazing that the party that came up with the slogan “It’s the economy, stupid” ignored, lied, or kept silent about the economy throughout Kamala’s campaign!!!

The word “ECONOMY” should’ve been constantly on her lips. But then again, how can you do that when there’s nothing to brag about. So, it was basically a lose/lose situation for her to begin with.

Bread & butter/food on the plate is always the #1 issue in any time, in any situation, in any nation! You’d think that any candidate would know that lesson. It’s right up there with don’t alienate the military and police.

NO Vice President of a party in power, with one exception, has ever won an election in a period of economic slowdown or recession. The first George Bush accomplished that because despite the ‘87 stock market crash the economy was still pretty strong during the ’88 election and people wanted a continuation of the Reagan era.

Otherwise, a slow economy is a killer to any party seeking reelection. No disrespect to Trump’s accomplishment, but Mickey Mouse could’ve beat Kamala if he was a republican. It’s incredible that she was still able to get the votes that she did, given the circumstances. In any other time, this would’ve been a complete blow out! I would’ve not expected her to get any more than one or two states and perhaps not as much as 15 to 30 electoral votes, but she got more in this election because unlike any other previous US election she had on her side an unapologetically biased and overworked propaganda machine that included all the liberal media, endorsements, and contributions that amounted to over a billion dollars. And of course, she still lost.

Again, she was always going to lose this election.

Second point: all the attacks on Trump had just the opposite effect. If someone tells you they are being targeted, and you see that they are targeted – guess what? You’re going to believe they are targeted, and that’s what the American public believed. In their zealousness to convict Trump the liberal establishment made him a martyr, which very nearly resulted in him becoming a dead martyr.

After that would-be assassin’s missed shot, Trump had the election all wrapped up. The juxtaposition of endless court dates, accusations of fascism by liberal leaders, and the attempted assassination plot made it all apparent that Trump and conservative republicans were right in claiming that Trump was being unfairly targeted.

Even if you weren’t a conservative republic, even if you were a moderate, you could not help but see that making Trump a target was not right, not just, and you want to help the guy being targeted, if only to send a message to those doing the targeting. Especially if that guy actually took a bullet and still fought on.

Third point: Trump and the republicans won the election not just because of the economy, but because of the other big elephant standing not only in the room, but knocking the room right off the map, destroying its boundaries – that’s right, the BORDER CRISIS! You really must wonder what the democrats were thinking with this one.

But it’s beyond explanation. Historically, nations without borders have disappeared from history. Is this what the democrats want after all?

There are many other issues that effected the election: WOKE, CRIME, DEI, TRANSGENDER ISSUES, among the many cultural issues.

In other words, Americans said ENOUGH!

I watched a recent clip of Bill Maher where he got on Harris and the democrats where he said while voters were saying they felt the economy, crime, and the border were bad, Harris and the democrats were saying, "Fuck how you feel, look at this graph".

 

[Hector12]

Trump's tariffs are going to cause inflation. Elon Musk's plan to eliminate nearly one third of the Federal Budget will eliminate programs most Republicans will insist on keeping.