The End of Democracy

[IM2]

So now it is legal for Biden to go after Trump if it is within his presidential duties. The upreme Court has ruled that the president has immunity. This is the end of democracy. This shows that the right wing doesn't give a damn about the constitution. Here we see an activist right wing court giving Trump coverfir his crimes. This is another sorry day for America.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

The Supreme Court on Monday raised the bar for prosecuting Donald Trump, ruling that he has immunity for some of his conduct as president in his federal election interference case, but maybe not for other actions, adding another obstacle for special counsel Jack Smith taking the case to trial.

In a novel and potentially consequential case on the limits of presidential power, the justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines to reject Trump’s broad claim of immunity, meaning the charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results will not be dismissed, but said some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Oddball]

You don't give one single flying fuck about the Constitution, so STFU.

 

[percysunshine]

Already addressed.

Roberts: "The dissents’ positions in the end boil down to ignoring the Constitution’s separation of powers and the Court’s precedent and instead fear mongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals about a future where the President “feels empowered to violate federal criminal law.” The dissents overlook the more likely prospect of an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself, with each successive President free to prosecute his predecessors, yet unable to boldly and fearlessly carry out his duties for fear that he may be next…. The enfeebling of the Presidency and our Government that would result from such a cycle of factional strife is exactly what the Framers intended to avoid."

 

[Cougarbear]

So now it is legal for Biden to go after Trump if it is within his presidential duties. The upreme Court has ruled that the president has immunity. This is the end of democracy. This shows that the right wing doesn't give a damn about the constitution. Here we see an activist right wing court giving Trump coverfir his crimes. This is another sorry day for America.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

The Supreme Court on Monday raised the bar for prosecuting Donald Trump, ruling that he has immunity for some of his conduct as president in his federal election interference case, but maybe not for other actions, adding another obstacle for special counsel Jack Smith taking the case to trial.

In a novel and potentially consequential case on the limits of presidential power, the justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines to reject Trump’s broad claim of immunity, meaning the charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results will not be dismissed, but said some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

www.nbcnews.com

You are so far off. Take a deep breath and think before typing. Nothing has actually changed. Nothing. Presidents have always used executive orders to do many things. Both Republicans and Democrats. What the Democrats have been trying to do is change this by putting on trial a President because they viewed him a a threat to democracy and the country when he was simply doing his duty as President. That's all the Court's decision did and said. That Biden can't go after Trump for something he was doing in an official act as President.

What we have seen is the usual Democrats going on their usual acts of RAGE. We've always known the Republicans are much happier people than Democrats. There are many studies on this. So, it's not surprising Democrats are going on a RAGE campaign, AGAIN!

 

[22lcidw]

So now it is legal for Biden to go after Trump if it is within his presidential duties. The upreme Court has ruled that the president has immunity. This is the end of democracy. This shows that the right wing doesn't give a damn about the constitution. Here we see an activist right wing court giving Trump coverfir his crimes. This is another sorry day for America.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

The Supreme Court on Monday raised the bar for prosecuting Donald Trump, ruling that he has immunity for some of his conduct as president in his federal election interference case, but maybe not for other actions, adding another obstacle for special counsel Jack Smith taking the case to trial.

In a novel and potentially consequential case on the limits of presidential power, the justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines to reject Trump’s broad claim of immunity, meaning the charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results will not be dismissed, but said some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

www.nbcnews.com

African Americans who work in what is considered menial employment and providing for their own have more honor and integrity than Representative Clyburn will ever have.

 

[Oddball]

Already addressed.

Roberts: "The dissents’ positions in the end boil down to ignoring the Constitution’s separation of powers and the Court’s precedent and instead fear mongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals about a future where the President “feels empowered to violate federal criminal law.” The dissents overlook the more likely prospect of an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself, with each successive President free to prosecute his predecessors, yet unable to boldly and fearlessly carry out his duties for fear that he may be next…. The enfeebling of the Presidency and our Government that would result from such a cycle of factional strife is exactly what the Framers intended to avoid."

Bedwetters gonna wet the bed.

 

[percysunshine]

Bedwetters gonna wet the bed.

Not sure if accusing other justices of hyperbolic fear mongering has ever been in a majority opinion before now.

 

[Votto]

So now it is legal for Biden to go after Trump if it is within his presidential duties. The upreme Court has ruled that the president has immunity. This is the end of democracy. This shows that the right wing doesn't give a damn about the constitution. Here we see an activist right wing court giving Trump coverfir his crimes. This is another sorry day for America.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

The Supreme Court on Monday raised the bar for prosecuting Donald Trump, ruling that he has immunity for some of his conduct as president in his federal election interference case, but maybe not for other actions, adding another obstacle for special counsel Jack Smith taking the case to trial.

In a novel and potentially consequential case on the limits of presidential power, the justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines to reject Trump’s broad claim of immunity, meaning the charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results will not be dismissed, but said some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

www.nbcnews.com

I would leave the country if I were you.

In fact, post a GoFundMe account here and I'm sure many would donate to help you leave the country once and for all.

That is, before Hitler takes over.

You do realize he grew a mustache after the debate, right?

 

[justoffal]

So now it is legal for Biden to go after Trump if it is within his presidential duties. The upreme Court has ruled that the president has immunity. This is the end of democracy. This shows that the right wing doesn't give a damn about the constitution. Here we see an activist right wing court giving Trump coverfir his crimes. This is another sorry day for America.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

The Supreme Court on Monday raised the bar for prosecuting Donald Trump, ruling that he has immunity for some of his conduct as president in his federal election interference case, but maybe not for other actions, adding another obstacle for special counsel Jack Smith taking the case to trial.

In a novel and potentially consequential case on the limits of presidential power, the justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines to reject Trump’s broad claim of immunity, meaning the charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results will not be dismissed, but said some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors.

Supreme Court provides win to Trump, ruling he has immunity for some acts in election interference indictment

The legal question on whether a former president has immunity from prosecution for official acts had never come before the court.

www.nbcnews.com

I hope Biden tries....

 

[IM2]

You are so far off. Take a deep breath and think before typing. Nothing has actually changed. Nothing. Presidents have always used executive orders to do many things. Both Republicans and Democrats. What the Democrats have been trying to do is change this by putting on trial a President because they viewed him a a threat to democracy and the country when he was simply doing his duty as President. That's all the Court's decision did and said. That Biden can't go after Trump for something he was doing in an official act as President.

What we have seen is the usual Democrats going on their usual acts of RAGE. We've always known the Republicans are much happier people than Democrats. There are many studies on this. So, it's not surprising Democrats are going on a RAGE campaign, AGAIN!

Bullshit. Trump was not doing his duty as President when he planned to overturn an election.

 

[justoffal]

I would leave the country if I were you.

In fact, post a GoFundMe account here and I'm sure many would donate to help you leave the country once and for all.

That is, before Hitler takes over.

View attachment 970148

You do realize he grew a mustache after the debate, right?

They are worried that Trump will imitate what they just did.

 

[IM2]

I hope Biden tries....

What are you goingto do? It's legal now.

 

[justoffal]

Bullshit. Trump wasnot doing his duty as President when he planned to overturn an election.

Matter of opinion....opinion doesn't wash.

 

[justoffal]

What are you goingto do? It's legal now.

I absolutely hope he tries

 

[IM2]

They are worried that Trump will imitate what they just did.

Get out that delusion chump. Trump broke the law.

 

[IM2]

Matter of opinion....opinion doesn't wash.

It is a proven matter of fact.

 

[IM2]

I would leave the country if I were you.

In fact, post a GoFundMe account here and I'm sure many would donate to help you leave the country once and for all.

That is, before Hitler takes over.

View attachment 970148

You do realize he grew a mustache after the debate, right?

You can leave. I'm staying.

 

[IM2]

Already addressed.

Roberts: "The dissents’ positions in the end boil down to ignoring the Constitution’s separation of powers and the Court’s precedent and instead fear mongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals about a future where the President “feels empowered to violate federal criminal law.” The dissents overlook the more likely prospect of an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself, with each successive President free to prosecute his predecessors, yet unable to boldly and fearlessly carry out his duties for fear that he may be next…. The enfeebling of the Presidency and our Government that would result from such a cycle of factional strife is exactly what the Framers intended to avoid."

Bullshit.

 

[percysunshine]

Bullshit. Trump wasnot doing his duty as President when he planned to overturn an election.

Thus the remanding back to the district Court to determine what were or were not official duties.

 

[percysunshine]

Bullshit.

Chief Justice IM2 has spoken.