Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
blah, blah, blah..... and yet the FBI didn't look at the DNC server. don't you think that would be important if this was all supposed to have happened? they didn't. that was enough for me. nope no hack.The Nancy who needs to get a grip on reality is the person who denies the fucking Russians hacked the DNC and revealed their findings through Wikileaks.Crooked Hillary deserves to take her lumps, but that doesn't absolve the fucking Russians any more than a gang-banger who takes a shot at another gang-banger but hits your car shouldn't be let off the hook because he was shooting at another gang-banger.
The fucking Russians attempted to sway our election. They shouldn't be allowed to get away with that.
No they didn't. Get a grip Nancy.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
The 4 Most Damaging Emails From the DNC WikiLeaks Dump
Trump’s top intelligence officials accept conclusion that Russia hacked election
WASHINGTON — Several top Trump administration intelligence officials told a Senate panel Thursday they accept the conclusion of a report earlier this year that says Russia undertook data thefts and hacking during the 2016 election — a finding President Donald Trump has questioned.
At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats submitted a statement concluding that Russia “has assumed a more aggressive cyber posture” in recent years.
“This aggressiveness was evident in Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. election and we assess that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized the 2016 U.S. election-focused data thefts and disclosures, based on the scope and sensitivity of the targets,” Coats wrote in his statement.
Coats, a former senator from Indiana, was nominated as director of national intelligence in January by the incoming president.
Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Community, asked the intelligence community leaders if they accepted a January report from the Obama administration that Russia had attempted to interfere in the presidential election through a campaign of disinformation, data thefts and leaks. The report also concluded that the effort was aimed at boosting Trump and damaging his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.
In response to his question, the heads of the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Security Agency all simply said “yes.”
An expanded version of this report appears at WSJ.com.
hey just a quick question, do you think the Billie Bush Trump conversation on the bus was influential in changing votes?The Nancy who needs to get a grip on reality is the person who denies the fucking Russians hacked the DNC and revealed their findings through Wikileaks.Crooked Hillary deserves to take her lumps, but that doesn't absolve the fucking Russians any more than a gang-banger who takes a shot at another gang-banger but hits your car shouldn't be let off the hook because he was shooting at another gang-banger.
The fucking Russians attempted to sway our election. They shouldn't be allowed to get away with that.
No they didn't. Get a grip Nancy.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
The 4 Most Damaging Emails From the DNC WikiLeaks Dump
Trump’s top intelligence officials accept conclusion that Russia hacked election
WASHINGTON — Several top Trump administration intelligence officials told a Senate panel Thursday they accept the conclusion of a report earlier this year that says Russia undertook data thefts and hacking during the 2016 election — a finding President Donald Trump has questioned.
At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats submitted a statement concluding that Russia “has assumed a more aggressive cyber posture” in recent years.
“This aggressiveness was evident in Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. election and we assess that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized the 2016 U.S. election-focused data thefts and disclosures, based on the scope and sensitivity of the targets,” Coats wrote in his statement.
Coats, a former senator from Indiana, was nominated as director of national intelligence in January by the incoming president.
Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Community, asked the intelligence community leaders if they accepted a January report from the Obama administration that Russia had attempted to interfere in the presidential election through a campaign of disinformation, data thefts and leaks. The report also concluded that the effort was aimed at boosting Trump and damaging his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.
In response to his question, the heads of the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Security Agency all simply said “yes.”
An expanded version of this report appears at WSJ.com.
I know. It's been my stance since fking day one. show me the evidence. NOW!!!!!prove who got hacked?
The tougher standard is prove who did it. They can't prove who did it, and they know it. They just want to BANG THE RUSSIAN DRUM over and over and over...
The Nancy who needs to get a grip on reality is the person who denies the fucking Russians hacked the DNC and revealed their findings through Wikileaks.
So, you are upset that the AMERICAN PEOPLE got the TRUTH?
Thanks, Mr. American Hero....
sort of like us about you eh?The Nancy who needs to get a grip on reality is the person who denies the fucking Russians hacked the DNC and revealed their findings through Wikileaks.
So, you are upset that the AMERICAN PEOPLE got the TRUTH?
Thanks, Mr. American Hero....
If you want to troll you need a mentor, someone who might be able to convince you that even trolls need to have some credibility. You have none. You will get the regular fools, members of the echo chamber to give you high fives, but no educated or discriminating reader will ever believe anything you post.
The Nancy who needs to get a grip on reality is the person who denies the fucking Russians hacked the DNC and revealed their findings through Wikileaks.
So, you are upset that the AMERICAN PEOPLE got the TRUTH?
Thanks, Mr. American Hero....
If you want to troll you need a mentor, someone who might be able to convince you that even trolls need to have some credibility. You have none. You will get the regular fools, members of the echo chamber to give you high fives, but no educated or discriminating reader will ever believe anything you post.
sort of like us about you eh?
Yes, just as our intelligence agencies reported. Did you miss it?they did?Crooked Hillary deserves to take her lumps, but that doesn't absolve the fucking Russians any more than a gang-banger who takes a shot at another gang-banger but hits your car shouldn't be let off the hook because he was shooting at another gang-banger.
The fucking Russians attempted to sway our election. They shouldn't be allowed to get away with that.
Intel report says Putin ordered campaign to influence US election...It's been my stance since fking day one. show me the evidence. NOW!!!!!
Wow, so many logical fallacies I don't know where to begin. How about if I just give you a list and see if you are honest enough to use your proclaimed education and good judgment to tell everyone what fallacies you've used?No, I'm educated and have good judgment, you are a fool who echoes meme's and echoes fake news as facts. But you know that, if you were honest.
Is hacking a crime?
Is attempting to undermine the election by cheating by giving one side the debate questions before the debate a crime?
prove who got hacked?Hacking is still a crime
WHO did the hacking?
LOL!!!
"The Russians" says the living breathing validation of the theory of Joseph Goebbels...
You cannot even prove the Russians did the hacking....
LOL!!!
It is PROVEN that CNN cheated with the Hillary campaign, and that doesn't bother your completely hypocritical rear one bit, and you aren't calling for prosecution either.
Is hacking a crime? Yes or no?
