The leftists are in a frenzy thinking that President Trump is going to throw his political opponents in jail. Hypocrisy anyone?

[Skylar]

United States v. Flynn - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ally Steve Bannon must surrender to prison by July 1 to start contempt sentence, judge says

Steve Bannon must report to prison by July 1 to serve his four-month sentence.

www.wrdw.com

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/25/politics/roger-stone-raid/index.html

So the Marxists/Fascists used the government to imprison anyone who dared disagree with the Joe Biden admin. Now when it looks like President Trump will be the 47th President, all the Leftists are in a panic, thinking that they could have that 4am wake up call.

Fight or flight: Fearful Trump critics weigh the risk of retribution if he's re-elected

Some are considering leaving the country if Trump returns to the White House or saving money to handle the expected legal costs.

www.nbcnews.com

Of course it can all be avoided if they just follow this important information.

Just leave your passport at the security check on your way out.

20 Stars Who Pledged to Flee the Country If Trump Was Elected: Where Are They Now?

Will Lena Dunham really move to Canada? Is Amy Schumer packing her bags for Spain? Here, a post-election update.

www.hollywoodreporter.com

Here's the difference: the narrative that Biden had Trump charged is fact-free. Its a story Trump made up and his followers repeated. There's zero evidence that Biden ordered Trump charged with anything. With plenty of evidence that Trump was charged based on the evidence.

Trump has said that HE would be justified in throwing his political opponents in jail if re-elected. And uses the fact-free narrative that Joe Biden has to justify doing it.

A perfect demonstration of the adage "Every conservative accusation is a confession."

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I don't see any of that in the final ruling that they voted on. You're talking about the original arguments. The SC ruled the president has "substantial" immunity for acts in office, not total immunity. Why do you lie?

Because that is all the Marxists/Demofascists can do, is lie all the time.

 

[BULLDOG]

I don't see any of that in the final ruling that they voted on. You're talking about the original arguments. The SC ruled the president has "substantial" immunity for acts in office, not total immunity. Why do you lie?

That was in the dissenting opinion filed with the majority opinion at the conclusion, long after arguments were completed and states the reason for the dissent. The truthfulness is not questioned. The majority just doesn't think it makes a difference.

 

[MagicMike]

Fuck it...Give them all a good healthy dose of their own medicine.

What this ruling today did was kick the case back down to U.S. District Court to be determined in Judge Chutkan's court whether or not certain conversations and actions were in fact "official" or not.
Look for this "mini-trial" to begin before August.
You MAGAt's little circle-jerk of celebration is probably a bit premature here. We're still going to be seeing a sort of "trial" here before the election.
More damning testimony broadcast to American voters day after day in a slow trickle between now and November.
You MAGAts can crow about this imagined "victory" of convicted felon Trump's all you want.....but in reality it doesn't really mean much.
He's still a convicted felon 34 times over.
He's still (most likely) going to be forced to surrender half of his ill-gotten wealth to the state of New York once he loses his appeal in his criminal fraud case.
He still has to face sentencing (that could include prison time) in his election interference case on July 11th.
And now ALL of the evidence against him that we saw presented by The House Select Committee on January 6th is going to be recycled and refreshed in the public's memory in Judge Chutkan's courtroom late this summer into the fall.
So, how is any of this a real "win" for Trump?

 

[BULLDOG]

What this ruling today did was kick the case back down to U.S. District Court to be determined in Judge Chutkan's court whether or not certain conversations and actions were in fact "official" or not.
Look for this "mini-trial" to begin before August.
You MAGAt's little circle-jerk of celebration is probably a bit premature here. We're still going to be seeing a sort of "trial" here before the election.
More damning testimony broadcast to American voters day after day in a slow trickle between now and November.
You MAGAts can crow about this imagined "victory" of convicted felon Trump's all you want.....but in reality it doesn't really mean much.
He's still a convicted felon 34 times over.
He's still (most likely) going to be forced to surrender half of his ill-gotten wealth to the state of New York once he loses his appeal in his criminal fraud case.
He still has to face sentencing (that could include prison time) in his election interference case on July 11th.
And now ALL of the evidence against him that we saw presented by The House Select Committee on January 6th is going to be recycled and refreshed in the public's memory in Judge Chutkan's courtroom late this summer into the fall.
So, how is any of this a real "win" for Trump?

It is a win in a sense. If trump is elected, he can just tell his Attorney General to drop all federal cases against him, and he will be protected under the new ruling. Again, he's not running to be president. He's running to stay out of jail.

 

[luiza]

It's true then .
The Donald also walks on water.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A supreme court justice wrote.
“When [a president] uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution.” She listed out some extreme cases where she argued this ruling would shield presidents from prosecution:


Sotomayor added: “In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.” She went on, concluding her dissent by stating her “fear for our democracy”:

MSN

Sotomayor is a ding bat

 

[Slade3200]

Why shouldn't he?


The die has been cast...The horse is out of the barn.

By that logic Biden should probably toss Trump in Guantanamo and throw away the key, right? Maybe even disqualify him from the election? I mean he is prez so he can commit any crimes he wants as long as he says he is doing it in service of the country, right??

 

[Oddball]

By that logic Biden should probably toss Trump in Guantanamo and throw away the key, right? Maybe even disqualify him from the election? I mean he is prez so he can commit any crimes he wants as long as he says he is doing it in service of the country, right??

You wouldn't know logic if it kicked your tiny moonbat beanbag.

 

[Slade3200]

You wouldn't know logic if it kicked your tiny moonbat beanbag.

What does that have to do with my point? Are you not able to counter it?

 

[Independent thinker]

That was in the dissenting opinion filed with the majority opinion at the conclusion, long after arguments were completed and states the reason for the dissent. The truthfulness is not questioned. The majority just doesn't think it makes a difference.

The court ruled that he has substantial or partial immunity, not total. You are a liar.

 

[BULLDOG]

The court ruled that he has substantial or partial immunity, not total. You are a liar.

Total immunity is not required

 

[MagicMike]

The court ruled that he has substantial or partial immunity, not total. You are a liar.

The SCOTUS didn't break any new ground or tell us anything we didn't already know.
Certain actions of a POTUS are covered by immunity.
Duh!
Certain actions are not.
Duh!
The SCOTUS has simply kicked it back down to the circuit court for Tanya Chutkan to determine which were and which weren't....and that's a no brainer.
the Jan. 6th Committee has already determined that.
His only "official duty" at that point was to participate in the smooth transition of power to his successor....and he failed.

 

[Independent thinker]

Total immunity is not required

Why do you lie?

 

[Independent thinker]

The SCOTUS didn't break any new ground or tell us anything we didn't already know.
Certain actions of a POTUS are covered by immunity.
Duh!
Certain actions are not.
Duh!
The SCOTUS has simply kicked it back down to the circuit court for Tanya Chutkan to determine which were and which weren't....and that's a no brainer.
the Jan. 6th Committee has already determined that.
His only "official duty" at that point was to participate in the smooth transition of power to his successor....and he failed.

How did he fail? Trump handed the keys to the White House to Biden and Biden has been president for 3 1/2 years. And, Biden took office at the exact moment he was supposed to.

 

[MagicMike]

How did he fail? Trump handed the keys to the White House to Biden and Biden has been president for 3 1/2 years. And, Biden took office at the exact moment he was supposed to.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

I hope Trump doubles up his security. The Liberals are talking about murdering him on tic tock.

 

[Mac-7]

Chris Matthews told them that Trump was going to round them up and put them in front of a firing squad and, of course, they believed it. Another poster on here just told me that Trump slipped something in Biden's drink before the debate and he was serious. TDS has left them all with no brains. However, quoting these people, no one should be above the law and we should show them that we totally agree with that.

I dont think libs believe all the hysterical bullshit they say

They cant possibly be that uninformed

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

What this ruling today did was kick the case back down to U.S. District Court to be determined in Judge Chutkan's court whether or not certain conversations and actions were in fact "official" or not.
Look for this "mini-trial" to begin before August.
You MAGAt's little circle-jerk of celebration is probably a bit premature here. We're still going to be seeing a sort of "trial" here before the election.
More damning testimony broadcast to American voters day after day in a slow trickle between now and November.
You MAGAts can crow about this imagined "victory" of convicted felon Trump's all you want.....but in reality it doesn't really mean much.
He's still a convicted felon 34 times over.
He's still (most likely) going to be forced to surrender half of his ill-gotten wealth to the state of New York once he loses his appeal in his criminal fraud case.
He still has to face sentencing (that could include prison time) in his election interference case on July 11th.
And now ALL of the evidence against him that we saw presented by The House Select Committee on January 6th is going to be recycled and refreshed in the public's memory in Judge Chutkan's courtroom late this summer into the fall.
So, how is any of this a real "win" for Trump?

You make it seem that MAGA is a bad word. I laugh at how stupid you are, because people who have a high IQ know, Make America Great Again, is a good thing. But then that is what makes morons like you a Joe Biden voter.

I apologize to morons for they have a higher IQ than a Joe Biden voter.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I dont think libs believe all the hysterical bullshit they say

They cant possibly be that uninformed

Look at the chart above. Yeah, they are that stupid.