Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
plz cite how not being in poverty create jobsplz cite where less producvity and more accidents creates jobsIf you want 25 million new jobs and huge upward pressure on wages vote Libertarian/Republican:
1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
plz cite how not being in poverty create jobs2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
plz cite where not having edcuations creates jobs
plz cite where making it illegal for companies to change prices creates jobs
plz cite where less producvity and more accidents creates jobs.....Unions REDUCE productivity. Outside of enriching itself, the primary function of a union is to maintain the largest membership possible. Getting the job done "too quickly"( productivity) is the enemy of unions.5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose[/quote[
yea that worked so well for spain and greece
6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose[/quite]
plz cite where spending billions to kick workers out of their jobs creates jobs
yea that worked so well for greece and spain
plz cite how paying workers jack shit creates jobs
I see so democreats makign competiion legal under obamcare meanas the made it illegal
plz cite how mercruy in our water creates jobs
plz cite how seniors not having health care creates jobs
edward like always is insane and retarded he needs anti-psychotic medication badly
1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
If you want 25 million new jobs and huge upward pressure on wages vote Libertarian/Republican:
1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose You are convinced that this would somehow create ten million new jobs? Interesting. In any case, no one is going to make unions illegal.
2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose So let's suppose 5M new jobs would be created. If they would only be created by eliminating minimum wage, then I would assume they would pay BELOW minimum wage, correct? The trend that would create is obvious, don't you think? Do you really want to see us get to a "Level playing field" with India, where the average wage is $2 / Day? That sounds like something that would make America better to you?
3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Actually, Obama and the Dems have both discussed closing the loopholes that would provide benefits for offshoring jobs and it is the GOP who is vehemently opposed to it. I'm not sure you wrote the 2nd part of that the way intended.
4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose LOL! Sorry but how would you accomplish that? Regulate the price that private enterprise is allowed to charge for goods and services? Where did you GET these ideas???
5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose So now you would eliminate the bond market. Not that any Republican could do such a thing anyway but pray tell, please clarify!
6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose You realize that Obama has deported more illegals in three years than Bush did in eight, right? jus sayin'
7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Again, please describe in detail how this would create one job.
8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose All government workers? Military? CIA? Doctors? Not that the Republicans would ever even try this but I love that you imply they would by writing "Democrats Oppose". You could as accurate write "People Not in a Coma Oppose".
9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Obviously, you're just making these job numbers up or got them from someone who did because just as obviously, you won't be able to provide details as to how this will create jobs. What? Will there suddenly be 120 million new consumers for insurance? Pardon me if I'm skeptical.
10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose Um yeah okay.
11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Wow. just wow.
12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
This will CREATE jobs? Okay let's hear it.
13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.
I'll be curious to see if you can back any of this up at all. I mean, it's hard to find anything here that doesn't seem far-fetched.
In any case, no one is going to make unions illegal.
In any case, no one is going to make unions illegal.
but you're a liberal so why bother to even try to think? Gov. Walker took a huge step toward making unions illegal, the libs called for new election, Gov. Walker is 7 point ahead in the polls. Guess which party he belongs to??
See why we are 100% positive liberals are slow??
help
help
you can read all about Gov. Walker if you'd like to learn about the long term Republican plan to make unions illegal again so all Americans have the same opportunity to bargain individually for higher wages and better jobs. Its disgusting that some get liberal approval to blackmail business for higher wages at the expense of those workers who don't get the liberal approval.
Your presense is an insult. How dare liberals be so stupid. How dare they bring their perfect ignorance to bear on the greatest conservative country in human history!!
Also, its easy enough to prove liberals are slow, very slow. Please say something intelligent in support of liberalism. See how easy that was. It sends liberals running for the door.
Ask conservatives to support conservatism and they are lining up to do so. What does that tell you?
You can't cite facts to support your claims and when given any challenge at all,
You can't cite facts to support your claims and when given any challenge at all,
why then be so afraid to say what facts and what challenge?????
What does your fear tell you, liberal!!!
Number 4 on your list.
How exactly will a president (or Congress, for that matter) "make inflation illegal"?
The Federal Reserve which is charged with the duty of controlling the supply of currency, is theoretically an independent body. This of course we all know is false. Given the fact that the Chair of the Fed is a presidential appointee but not necessarily of the sitting Chief Executive, serves at the pleasure of the sitting President. While the sitting President cannot summarily dismiss the Fed Chair, he or she can certainly influence who holds the Office. Therefore the executive branch has influence over the Fed Reserve.`You can't cite facts to support your claims and when given any challenge at all,
why then be so afraid to say what facts and what challenge?????
What does your fear tell you, liberal!!!
Fine. I usually find it distasteful to pick on those obviously inequipped to defend theselves but even a child deserves a spanking if they persist in bothering their superiors.
Number 4 on your list.
How exactly will a president (or Congress, for that matter) "make inflation illegal"?
The rest of your claim in this regard will be laughably easy to disect you with but let's just start there.
I predict you will fail to provide any verifiable facts to support your ludicrous claim, change the subject, sling a few more of those character-revealing petty insults and a bit of that laughably false bravado.
Or you might just Cut & Run.
We'll see.
The Federal Reserve which is charged with the duty of controlling the supply of currency, is theoretically an independent body. This of course we all know is false. Given the fact that the Chair of the Fed is a presidential appointee but not necessarily of the sitting Chief Executive, serves at the pleasure of the sitting President. While the sitting President cannot summarily dismiss the Fed Chair, he or she can certainly influence who holds the Office. Therefore the executive branch has influence over the Fed Reserve.`why then be so afraid to say what facts and what challenge?????
What does your fear tell you, liberal!!!
Fine. I usually find it distasteful to pick on those obviously inequipped to defend theselves but even a child deserves a spanking if they persist in bothering their superiors.
Number 4 on your list.
How exactly will a president (or Congress, for that matter) "make inflation illegal"?
The rest of your claim in this regard will be laughably easy to disect you with but let's just start there.
I predict you will fail to provide any verifiable facts to support your ludicrous claim, change the subject, sling a few more of those character-revealing petty insults and a bit of that laughably false bravado.
Or you might just Cut & Run.
We'll see.
The Fed Reserve has for quite some time been mismanaging the money supply. It also has held interest rates artificially low.
The Fed Reserve is in part responsible for adversely affecting the US economy.
That's a fact.
If you want 25 million new jobs and huge upward pressure on wages vote Libertarian/Republican:
1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose
Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.
Modern day liberalism has transformed into a semi-socialist ideology. Libs now call themselves "progressives".
There is nothing liberal( rooted in the concept of Liberty) about the progressive movement which to it's core seeks to create dependency on government. Progressives view the capitalist market based economic system as unfair and criminal. Progressives believe all wealth should be owned by government to be redistributed as it sees fit.
Progressives do not believe in equality. They insist on equality of outcome. That all people are the to be rewarded equally without regard to intelligence or ability. With progressives there is no room for achievement and success. These are to be ripped away from the human spirit because in their view achievement is offensive to the progressive notion that there can be no failure. There can be no one person who builds and creates on their own. There can be no failure and no success.
Progressives support the concept of collectivism and abhor individualism.
Funny thing is that every dictator that rules over an oppressed population is a capitalist. Of course, they see themselves as superior beings and don't believe that the lesser people have the same desires and intelligence they possess. That is why the leaders are always living well while the rest of the people suffer equally.
There will always be those power hungry people who feel they are best suited to tell the rest of the world how to live their lives. They are intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them, but that is typical of narcissists.
They foolishly believe that 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need' is a good creed to live by. They have no grasp of human nature and the need we all have to be free. They don't understand why people stop trying to succeed once the rewards are taken away. People will not strive to give to those who are idle and remain their equals. Many are idle by choice and, by choice, have no ability for the government to use for the benefit of others.
The only way the liberal utopia could exist is if people had no free will and if everyone actually would give and take equally. That will never happen. Everyone would also have to be willing to cede all power to an elite group of self-proclaimed rulers of the universe. Of course, the leaders will never live with the restrictions they impose on others.
Every communist or socialist country slowly transferred power from the people to the government by claiming it was for the greater good. Those who resist are accused of being greedy and non-caring. Self reliance and personal responsibility are frowned upon because the government dependents do not possess these traits.
Those who are already dependent on government become cheerleaders as the government seeks to take more from the producers with the promise of delivering more to the takers. They foolishly believe that an endless flow of cash will sustain the programs forever and many have no clue as to how wealth is created.
Obama and the Dems are currently leaning toward socialism. No question about it the way they seek to redistribute wealth and the increasing government intrusion into the private sector.
People are created equal and we have equal opportunities. Not including the disabled, we all have the same chance to make something of our lives regardless of the circumstances we start with. Poor have become wealthy. Middle class can become wealthy or poor, depending on choices. Our own individual choices determine everything. You will only be equal with others who try as hard, or as little, as you. But each of us has to build our own lives, or not, and the government cannot micromanage our lives to ensure that we have equal outcomes. If they try to do that by manipulation, we all lose.
The concept that the government could regulate prices so as to somehow guarantee they would never go up, is laughable.
Funny thing is that every dictator that rules over an oppressed population is a capitalist. .
The concept that the government could regulate prices so as to somehow guarantee they would never go up, is laughable.
you said its laughable( based on a liberal feeling or whim I presume? ) but you forgot to say why its laughable? Why be so afraid to even try??? What does your fear tell you, liberal.
What you're proposing is that the government be allowed to tell ALL private enterprises what they are allowed to charge for a product or service.
What you're proposing is that the government be allowed to tell ALL private enterprises what they are allowed to charge for a product or service.
too stupid, perfectly liberal, and brain dead!!!!!!!
we were talking about inflation which has to do with the general price level as it relates to the total supply of money. If the government keeps the supply of money constant then sure one firm can raise its prices , but that only means another has to lower his since the amount of money remains constant, thus inflation is impossible.
This is Econ 101 class one day one!! Why not wait till after college before you treat us to your independent logic again!! You can call me Sir since you are the liberal in this relataionship. Shall I call you, "my child." How old are you???
So if you have said "make increasing the currency circulation illegal", you would have been closer to accurate.
So if you have said "make increasing the currency circulation illegal", you would have been closer to accurate.
wow!!!! you've gone from saying that the idea of making inflation illegal was idiotic and impossible to saying its close to accurate!!!
You may call me, Sir!!!
