The nail in the Warner's coffin and they don't even realize it.

[PredFan]

The warmers accidentally prove that man made global warming is false:

If the CO2s were this high 800,000 years ago, then that is proof that warming is cyclical and that CO2 follows temperature. The deniers are correct of course. Where were the SUVs and coal fired power plants 800 centuries ago?
Time to give up the scam or in the cases if you unfortunate people who fell for it, time to admit you've been had.

Carbon Dioxide Levels Just Hit Their Highest Point In 800,000 Years | ThinkProgress

 

[PredFan]

Nothing from the global warming fanatics?

Or is it that it says "Warners" in the title? Damn auto correct never works when you want it to, only when you don't.

 

[mamooth]

Check it out, Peewee here is proclaiming victory because nobody decided to laugh at him instantly. No, that doesn't make someone look obsessive. Really it doesn't.

In his OP, Peewee is using the "It happened this way in the past, so is has to act the same in the present, even though conditions are wildly different now!" fallacy. The funny thing is that he thinks it's original and intelligent.

I could type slowly and use small worlds, in an attempt to explain to him why it was so dumb. It wouldn't help. His cult has defined such stupid arguments as correct, hence the cultists are required to agree, period.

 

[Old Rocks]

Actually, that refers to the definate records we have from the Antarctic Ice cores. 800,000 years ago is all that we have good records for from the ice. From sediments in a lake in Siberia, it was about 3.6 million years ago that the CO2 level was this high.


Ice-Free Arctic in Pliocene, Last Time CO2 Levels above 400 PPM
Sediment cores from an undisturbed Siberian lake reveal a warmer, wetter Arctic
May 10, 2013 |By Stephanie Paige Ogburn and Nature magazine


Ice-Free Arctic in Pliocene, Last Time CO2 Levels above 400 PPM - Scientific American

Flickr/NASA's Earth Observatory
Scientists trying to determine how the Earth might change as temperatures rise often look back in time to a period around 3.6 million years ago called the middle Pliocene, when concentrations of carbon dioxide ranged from about 380 to 450 parts per million. (Today they are nearing 400.)

A study published yesterday in the journal Science analyzed the longest land-based sediment core ever taken in the Arctic and found that during this period, from 3.6 million to 2.2 million years ago, the area around the North Pole was much warmer and wetter than it is now.

In the middle Pliocene, summer temperatures in the Arctic were around 60 degrees Fahrenheit, which is about 14 degrees warmer than they are now, the study found.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Actually, that refers to the definate records we have from the Antarctic Ice cores. 800,000 years ago is all that we have good records for from the ice. From sediments in a lake in Siberia, it was about 3.6 million years ago that the CO2 level was this high.


Ice-Free Arctic in Pliocene, Last Time CO2 Levels above 400 PPM
Sediment cores from an undisturbed Siberian lake reveal a warmer, wetter Arctic
May 10, 2013 |By Stephanie Paige Ogburn and Nature magazine


Ice-Free Arctic in Pliocene, Last Time CO2 Levels above 400 PPM - Scientific American

Flickr/NASA's Earth Observatory
Scientists trying to determine how the Earth might change as temperatures rise often look back in time to a period around 3.6 million years ago called the middle Pliocene, when concentrations of carbon dioxide ranged from about 380 to 450 parts per million. (Today they are nearing 400.)

A study published yesterday in the journal Science analyzed the longest land-based sediment core ever taken in the Arctic and found that during this period, from 3.6 million to 2.2 million years ago, the area around the North Pole was much warmer and wetter than it is now.

In the middle Pliocene, summer temperatures in the Arctic were around 60 degrees Fahrenheit, which is about 14 degrees warmer than they are now, the study found.

The ice cores have an almost 100% correlation of CO2 LAGGING temperature increases and decreases

 

[Old Rocks]

and

 

[CrusaderFrank]

and CO2 never drove the temperature

But that was old CO2...today's new CO2 is the Main Climate Control knob, amiright?

 

[mamooth]

According to Frank's stellar logic, since species went extinct in the past without human intervention, it's impossible for humans to cause extinctions now.

This is why the world laughs at deniers. They almost all suck hard at basic logic. Scientists are good at logic, hence they instantly see how stupid deniers are. Deniers, generally being too stupid to understand that they're stupid, assume all the laughter means a conspiracy against them.

 

[PredFan]

Actually, that refers to the definate records we have from the Antarctic Ice cores. 800,000 years ago is all that we have good records for from the ice. From sediments in a lake in Siberia, it was about 3.6 million years ago that the CO2 level was this high.


Ice-Free Arctic in Pliocene, Last Time CO2 Levels above 400 PPM
Sediment cores from an undisturbed Siberian lake reveal a warmer, wetter Arctic
May 10, 2013 |By Stephanie Paige Ogburn and Nature magazine


Ice-Free Arctic in Pliocene, Last Time CO2 Levels above 400 PPM - Scientific American

Flickr/NASA's Earth Observatory
Scientists trying to determine how the Earth might change as temperatures rise often look back in time to a period around 3.6 million years ago called the middle Pliocene, when concentrations of carbon dioxide ranged from about 380 to 450 parts per million. (Today they are nearing 400.)

A study published yesterday in the journal Science analyzed the longest land-based sediment core ever taken in the Arctic and found that during this period, from 3.6 million to 2.2 million years ago, the area around the North Pole was much warmer and wetter than it is now.

In the middle Pliocene, summer temperatures in the Arctic were around 60 degrees Fahrenheit, which is about 14 degrees warmer than they are now, the study found.

Hmmm... Seems like we have dueling scientists here. What happened to the consensus?

Seems to me that there have been many points in geologic history that CO2 was 400ppm or above. Sounds cyclical to me. Or were there Pliocene Hummers and Escalades running around that we aren't aware of?

 

[PredFan]

According to Frank's stellar logic, since species went extinct in the past without human intervention, it's impossible for humans to cause extinctions now.

This is why the world laughs at deniers. They almost all suck hard at basic logic. Scientists are good at logic, hence they instantly see how stupid deniers are. Deniers, generally being too stupid to understand that they're stupid, assume all the laughter means a conspiracy against them.

It's cute how you desperately cling to the mast of your sinking ship.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

According to Frank's stellar logic, since species went extinct in the past without human intervention, it's impossible for humans to cause extinctions now.

This is why the world laughs at deniers. They almost all suck hard at basic logic. Scientists are good at logic, hence they instantly see how stupid deniers are. Deniers, generally being too stupid to understand that they're stupid, assume all the laughter means a conspiracy against them.

Ahh it sucks so bad when the data fails your cute little theory. The 600,000 year data set is a denier

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

 

[Abraham3]

The warmers accidentally prove that man made global warming is false:

If the CO2s were this high 800,000 years ago, then that is proof that warming is cyclical and that CO2 follows temperature. The deniers are correct of course. Where were the SUVs and coal fired power plants 800 centuries ago?
Time to give up the scam or in the cases if you unfortunate people who fell for it, time to admit you've been had.

Carbon Dioxide Levels Just Hit Their Highest Point In 800,000 Years | ThinkProgress

My god are you stupid. Frank, you should thank this man. He may well have taken your mantle.

 

[skookerasbil]

LOL....PredFan pwns the AGW k00ks with three sentences.

 

[Abraham3]

And Skooks makes it a three-way tie!