Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The black vote put him over the top.The real reason Trump is president is summed up right here.
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.![]()
To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5
Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.
Be Better, Media: Issues With Racial Framing in Post-2024 Election Coverage
www.law.georgetown.edu
Lol, Trump supporters? Why didn't you call Hunter Biden out when the emails were released? He spoke the n word fluently and his dad you totally supported. You're nothing but a hypocrite. Also Trump only pointed out the Harris did claim to be Indian before she was black. She was the first Indian woman senator.The real reason Trump is president is summed up right here.
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.![]()
To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5
Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.
Be Better, Media: Issues With Racial Framing in Post-2024 Election Coverage
www.law.georgetown.edu
And he needs to remember that. Although it is difficult with the Progressives and their antics.The black vote put him over the top.
Name who you think would beat Trump?
Yes minorities are fleeing the demklan plantation! FreedomThe real reason Trump is president is summed up right here.
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.![]()
To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5
Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.
Be Better, Media: Issues With Racial Framing in Post-2024 Election Coverage
www.law.georgetown.edu
There is the major problem. Unable to name the person to run against Trump. Vance is the next President.Probably anyone that didn't have the post Trump Administration COVID recovery that Trump could blame them for.
Harris didn't have that kind of removal since she was Biden's VP.
But other than that you'd have to ask a DEM about who they would have likely run in a full primary.
WW
There is the major problem. Unable to name the person to run against Trump. Vance is the next President.
Republicans have the presidency locked up. Did you want to name a democrat who can win now?: SHRUG :
Possible. Although I don't think it's likely. The GOP has razor thin margins now in the Senate and House, and will likely loose one or both in 2026.
I have no idea what 2028 will look like.
WW
Trumps team did an outstanding job vs Covid19. I truly say that and with dedicated honesty. I will now explain. For new diseases, normally the system inherited by Trump spends up to 10 years to make, test and finally approve vaccines. Trumps team did that in 10 months.Probably anyone that didn't have the post Trump Administration COVID recovery that Trump could blame them for.
Why? So far they are working miracles. What administration has been overhauling Government this fast? Even FDR took many years.Possible. Although I don't think it's likely. The GOP has razor thin margins now in the Senate and House, and will likely loose one or both in 2026.
Gavin Newsome has been killing millions of chickens in an attempt to create food shortages and high prices.Or a Chicken voting for the man twisting its neck.
How does he kill them and where does he kill them?Gavin Newsome has been killing millions of chickens in an attempt to create food shortages and high prices.
Democrats = traitors
Republicans have the presidency locked up. Did you want to name a democrat who can win now?
The real reason is because the left is absolutely insane. Look no further than the presidential address.The real reason Trump is president is summed up right here.
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.![]()
To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5
Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.
Be Better, Media: Issues With Racial Framing in Post-2024 Election Coverage
www.law.georgetown.edu
Are you saying that white people shouldn't be allowed to vote?The real reason Trump is president is summed up right here.
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.![]()
To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5
Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.
Be Better, Media: Issues With Racial Framing in Post-2024 Election Coverage
www.law.georgetown.edu
The diatribe is bereft of any facts showing that "Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history".The real reason Trump is president is summed up right here.
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.![]()
To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5
Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.
Be Better, Media: Issues With Racial Framing in Post-2024 Election Coverage
www.law.georgetown.edu