The Second Greatest Threat…

Given the choice, I would much rather see the regime removed by sanctions, as Trump is pursuing, than war.

Bet you would too.

They held our Embassy hostages, killed hundreds of GIs in Iraq with their IEDs, put our sailors on their knees to surrender their craft in international waters. Regime-change in my opinion is killing every imam and ayatolla in that country....behead their regime....I have no beef with the Iranian people....Their "green revolt" would have overthrown their oppressors if Obama had sent 500 shotguns into the slums of Tehran...instead he watched them being beaten and shot and did nothing. Trump will move on them with the IDF and Iraqi military to overfly Iraq (the only route the IDF can get back home from) and free their people of these perverts.


You know that the Iranians occupy an island in Venezuela....and have benefited from the Democrat open border, and sent in cells.

I don't want to lose any more Americans.

SHEEEEESH DAMN------an island in Venezuela ?????
 
Iran is the second greatest threat.

The greatest threat is the gullibility of Americans who still don’t realize that Obama has always played for the other side.
 
Given the choice, I would much rather see the regime removed by sanctions, as Trump is pursuing, than war.

Bet you would too.

They held our Embassy hostages, killed hundreds of GIs in Iraq with their IEDs, put our sailors on their knees to surrender their craft in international waters. Regime-change in my opinion is killing every imam and ayatolla in that country....behead their regime....I have no beef with the Iranian people....Their "green revolt" would have overthrown their oppressors if Obama had sent 500 shotguns into the slums of Tehran...instead he watched them being beaten and shot and did nothing. Trump will move on them with the IDF and Iraqi military to overfly Iraq (the only route the IDF can get back home from) and free their people of these perverts.


You know that the Iranians occupy an island in Venezuela....and have benefited from the Democrat open border, and sent in cells.

I don't want to lose any more Americans.

SHEEEEESH DAMN------an island in Venezuela ?????


"Hezbollah's Presence And Iran's Influence In Venezuela Coming Into Focus
Admiral Craig S. Faller, Commander of U.S. Southern Command, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on February 7, 2019 that “Iran has deepened its anti-U.S. Spanish language media coverage and has exported its state support for terrorism into our hemisphere.” This statement came on the heels of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s statement on FOX the previous day. Pompeo stated, “Hezbollah has active cells – the Iranians are impacting the people of Venezuela and throughout South America.”
Hezbollah's Presence And Iran's Influence In Venezuela Coming Into Focus



"Margarita Island off the Caribbean coast of Venezuela serves as a hub for drug trafficking and Hezbollah as well as other Islamist extremists such as Hamas. Margarita Island is being used by Iranian and Iranian-linked militants as a base of operations. "
Ibid.
 
The U.S. has been subject to Tariff Terrorism for 50 years. But a real deal with china can be done
 
14. The religion of Saudi Arabia and Iran allows lies to shield or advance the faith.

Like this:

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"





And contrary to all of his promises not to do so, and in contravention of the non-proliferation agreement that is our policy, Hussein Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran....

NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:
"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.
In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written four years ago.





There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.

Unless one was infatuated with the idea of ‘a Muslim Bomb!’


And who would favor that?? A radical Muslim, perhaps.
Hussein Obama.
Traitor As is the garbage Trump Obama was the best you've seen in your lifetime


Is Hussein actually Muslim, with the best interest of Islam as his highest aspiration?


Think carefully.....if you say 'no,' you got some 'splainin' to do, Lucy.
Obama is credit to America A man who sacrificed many years of his life in service to the country he loves And he did it despite the slings and arrows thrown at him by those not fit to carry his jock strap
 
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.
 
14. The religion of Saudi Arabia and Iran allows lies to shield or advance the faith.

Like this:

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"





And contrary to all of his promises not to do so, and in contravention of the non-proliferation agreement that is our policy, Hussein Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran....

NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:
"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.
In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written four years ago.





There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.

Unless one was infatuated with the idea of ‘a Muslim Bomb!’


And who would favor that?? A radical Muslim, perhaps.
Hussein Obama.
Traitor As is the garbage Trump Obama was the best you've seen in your lifetime


Is Hussein actually Muslim, with the best interest of Islam as his highest aspiration?


Think carefully.....if you say 'no,' you got some 'splainin' to do, Lucy.
Obama is credit to America A man who sacrificed many years of his life in service to the country he loves And he did it despite the slings and arrows thrown at him by those not fit to carry his jock strap



You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you would not be successful.


I notice you didn't have any explanation for this......

The United States State Department, even with it’s long antipathy toward Israel, the State Department says Iran is the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism.
Yet, this was Hussein’s behavior toward that 7th century barbaric regime:


Barack Obama was ushering in the age of the ‘Iranian Nuclear Bomb’ and fueling Iran’s war machine.


Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.
Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism


He gave his nod to ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for 7th century barbarians.

Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.


The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.





Nor did you address this.......



“…Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.
The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal.” Daily Thought Pad: Obama's Harvard Years: Questions Swirl




“But when you’re watching this in the campaign, and you’re onto this story, you’re saying, “Why isn’t anyone in the major media asking how it is that this radical anti-Semite, Khalid al Mansour, was pushing Obama into Harvard twenty years before the election?” Isn’t this worth investigating, this connection? No it wasn’t—it was worth burying…But they just buried that whole story, and when I saw that—I mean, you know this, and you and Accuracy Media have been confronting this for years, how they bury stories that they simply don’t want to share with the rest of the world.”
Obama Deconstructed: An Interview with Jack Cashill




Why would a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist, and the Saudis….want to see Obama as President?

Did he win an essay contest of some sort??? His grades????

They liked his….tone????

Or something about him that would appeal to radical, anti-Semitic Muslims?????

Anyone have an answer to that?






Care to try????
 
Last edited:
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.



Reagan was successful against a far more powerful enemy, a nuclear power, using sanctions.

The analogies with the former East Germany suggest that Iran, too, is ripe for regime change. They also suggest that a change may come in weeks, months or years, depending on chance events and particularly on whether the local authorities and their security forces, at least in some areas, get tired of killing people.What is likely to push such developments forward? The answer is that the new American policy, whether by chance or intent, may be as good as anything.” Iran: The Hollowing-Out of the Regime


.......Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he actually intended to end Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism and its desire for nuclear weapons:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.

Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p. , p.185




"Reagan .... thought the aim of American foreign policy should be not to get along with the Communist powers but to hasten their end.

He opposed the Helsinki accords because he thought they codified the captive status of Moscow's East European satellites. He believed détente conferred a false legitimacy upon states whose governments were not installed by the consent of the governed.

He agreed with Churchill and with the Democrats' mid-century presidents that the best way to avoid a war was to be ready to fight one, and he quoted in one of his radio addresses the phrase "No nation ever saved its freedom by disarming itself in the hope of placating an enemy," from NSC-68, one of the Cold War founding documents of the Truman administration.

Thirty years earlier, these beliefs were the views of politicians of both major parties, .... Reagan's aim was to restore these views to the national dialogue, and in time he did."Reagan in Opposition




Obama's aim was always to nuclear arm the worst of western civilization's enemies.
And he did.
 
I wonder why this information is not RED FLAGGED for the people of the USA----sheeeeesh-----who is ASLEEP.?
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.

ok----can you ---uhm ---kinda tell us where and who is the HEADS OF THE SNAKE?
 
I wonder why this information is not RED FLAGGED for the people of the USA----sheeeeesh-----who is ASLEEP.?
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.

ok----can you ---uhm ---kinda tell us where and who is the HEADS OF THE SNAKE?



They're not asleep, Irosie......this is a calculated effort by America's enemies.....headquartered in the Democrat Party.
 
ok----can you ---uhm ---kinda tell us where and who is the HEADS OF THE SNAKE?

The theocracy that is leading Iran into a holocaust. They're not hard to find at any given moment....Israel has dozens of spies who's job is to locate them. The IDF has every right to use nuclear weapons on Iran.....50 years of threats gives them that right.
 
ok----can you ---uhm ---kinda tell us where and who is the HEADS OF THE SNAKE?

The theocracy that is leading Iran into a holocaust. They're not hard to find at any given moment....Israel has dozens of spies who's job is to locate them. The IDF has every right to use nuclear weapons on Iran.....50 years of threats gives them that right.

Israel cannot do it alone. DA PEOPLE gotta be educated to just what a HUGE threat Iran really is ----------IRAN SYRIA RUSSIA-----da axis
 
Reagan was successful against a far more powerful enemy, a nuclear power, using sanctions.

.

Sanctions had no effect on the Soviets.....Reagan built Star Wars which they tried to defend against and went broke doing it. Of more importance was the unrest in Poland and the rest of their stolen empire. Add in what they spent before getting kicked out of Afghanistan and you have a Yeltsin standing on a truck bed demanding a new government.
 
I wonder why this information is not RED FLAGGED for the people of the USA----sheeeeesh-----who is ASLEEP.?
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.

ok----can you ---uhm ---kinda tell us where and who is the HEADS OF THE SNAKE?



Let me answer that.....the ultra radical fundamentalist Ayatollahs of Iran.

These psychotics look forward to a global conflagration.


"...the 12th Imam is held by devout Shi'ite Muslims to be a direct descendant of the Prophet Mohammed who went into "occlusion" in the ninth century at the age of five and hasn't been seen since.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse – and then lead the world into an era of universal peace.


Rumours abound of Mr Ahmadinejad's devotion to the 12th Imam, and last year it was reported that he had persuaded his cabinet to sign a "contract" pledging themselves to work for his return.

Another example of his messianic tendencies surfaced after 108 people were killed in an aircraft crash in Teheran. Mr Ahmadinejad praised the victims, saying: "What is important is that they have shown the way to martyrdom which we must follow."


For many of the hundreds of delegates who attended Mr Ahmadinejad's speech to the UN this week, his discourse on the merits of the 12th Imam finally brought home the reality of the danger his regime poses to world peace.

Rather than allaying concerns about Iran's nuclear ambitions, Mr Ahmadinejad spoke at length about how a Muslim saviour would relieve the world's suffering.

The era of Western predominance was drawing to a close, he said, and would soon be replaced by a "bright future" ushered in by the 12th Imam's return. "Without any doubt, the Promised One, who is the ultimate Saviour, will come. The pleasing aroma of justice will permeate the whole world."


The really alarming aspect is that – if the world's leading intelligence agencies are to be believed – he is seriously attempting to acquire a nuclear weapons arsenal."
Will the 12th Imam cause war with Iran?




“Potentially the most disturbing. The leadership of Pakistan is a central binary to what will happen. In nearly three-fourths of our war scenarios, the presence of a military leader or a traditional politician in the Pakistani presidency is a precursor to a reasonable outcome with India, an outcome in which nuclear weapons are kept in silo, so to speak.

However, the exact opposite likelihood scenario occurs when you place an Islamist in the Pakistani presidency. More than eighty percent of the time, nuclear weapons will be introduced to the theater.”
Ben Coes’s novel, ‘Coup D’Etat,’ p. 84
 
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.



Reagan was successful against a far more powerful enemy, a nuclear power, using sanctions.

The analogies with the former East Germany suggest that Iran, too, is ripe for regime change. They also suggest that a change may come in weeks, months or years, depending on chance events and particularly on whether the local authorities and their security forces, at least in some areas, get tired of killing people.What is likely to push such developments forward? The answer is that the new American policy, whether by chance or intent, may be as good as anything.” Iran: The Hollowing-Out of the Regime


.......Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he actually intended to end Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism and its desire for nuclear weapons:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.

Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p. , p.185




"Reagan .... thought the aim of American foreign policy should be not to get along with the Communist powers but to hasten their end.

He opposed the Helsinki accords because he thought they codified the captive status of Moscow's East European satellites. He believed détente conferred a false legitimacy upon states whose governments were not installed by the consent of the governed.

He agreed with Churchill and with the Democrats' mid-century presidents that the best way to avoid a war was to be ready to fight one, and he quoted in one of his radio addresses the phrase "No nation ever saved its freedom by disarming itself in the hope of placating an enemy," from NSC-68, one of the Cold War founding documents of the Truman administration.

Thirty years earlier, these beliefs were the views of politicians of both major parties, .... Reagan's aim was to restore these views to the national dialogue, and in time he did."Reagan in Opposition




Obama's aim was always to nuclear arm the worst of western civilization's enemies.
And he did.
What a crock Bklyn weeps for you
 
Israel cannot do it alone. DA PEOPLE gotta be educated to just what a HUGE threat Iran really is ----------IRAN SYRIA RUSSIA-----da axis

Who said Israel would "go it alone"?????I believe I have a little better understanding of what Iran is and it ain't than you're giving me credit for. Syria is on it's ass and Russia won't defend Iran at the cost of a confrontation with Trump. We'll be careful not to kill more russian techs than necessary in striking Iran. Remember, they tried a Spetsnaz attack on our forces in Syria and lost 250 men.....they learned that night we will kill them by the bushel if necessary.
 
Reagan was successful against a far more powerful enemy, a nuclear power, using sanctions.

.

Sanctions had no effect on the Soviets.....Reagan built Star Wars which they tried to defend against and went broke doing it. Of more importance was the unrest in Poland and the rest of their stolen empire. Add in what they spent before getting kicked out of Afghanistan and you have a Yeltsin standing on a truck bed demanding a new government.



You're kidding.


Sanctions and stoking up unrest among the citizens did the job.

As long as the President is Trump, and not Obama.


Just like the Soviet Union, the Iranians will choose butter over guns.
 
They have sleeper cells throughout this country already.

Sanctions and pressure can beat them.

Disagree....they're fully prepared to put their people through a living hell if necessary. Sanctions don't work against dictators,,you must kill the head of the snake. Without anybody to signal these supposed sleeper-cells, they'll never get the green-light and slip back into mexico.



Reagan was successful against a far more powerful enemy, a nuclear power, using sanctions.

The analogies with the former East Germany suggest that Iran, too, is ripe for regime change. They also suggest that a change may come in weeks, months or years, depending on chance events and particularly on whether the local authorities and their security forces, at least in some areas, get tired of killing people.What is likely to push such developments forward? The answer is that the new American policy, whether by chance or intent, may be as good as anything.” Iran: The Hollowing-Out of the Regime


.......Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he actually intended to end Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism and its desire for nuclear weapons:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.

Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p. , p.185




"Reagan .... thought the aim of American foreign policy should be not to get along with the Communist powers but to hasten their end.

He opposed the Helsinki accords because he thought they codified the captive status of Moscow's East European satellites. He believed détente conferred a false legitimacy upon states whose governments were not installed by the consent of the governed.

He agreed with Churchill and with the Democrats' mid-century presidents that the best way to avoid a war was to be ready to fight one, and he quoted in one of his radio addresses the phrase "No nation ever saved its freedom by disarming itself in the hope of placating an enemy," from NSC-68, one of the Cold War founding documents of the Truman administration.

Thirty years earlier, these beliefs were the views of politicians of both major parties, .... Reagan's aim was to restore these views to the national dialogue, and in time he did."Reagan in Opposition




Obama's aim was always to nuclear arm the worst of western civilization's enemies.
And he did.
What a crock Bklyn weeps for you


I just gave you two striking examples, the conclusion of which is the truth about Hussein....

You ran from both.


Here's another poke in your eye:

When it comes to Iran, the 7th century homicidal maniacs…

a. He sends them pallets loaded with cash

b. He guarantees them nuclear weapons

c. He removes the sanctions that were restricting the funds they had for terrorism.


d. He obstructs justice, the DoJ case against Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, for selling $1 billion of cocaine in the US

e. And….he provides them with the fruits of America’s technological achievements, to make them more formidable as enemies to America….our drone technology.
Obama as President turned over, directly to the 7th century savages, our latest and most technologically advanced, surveillance drone, the RQ-170 Sentinel.....
...of course, by extension, turned it over to Russia and China, as well.
When the drone crash landed in Iran...that's 'Death To America Iran'.....Obama let them keep it.

"President Obama said on Monday that the United States had asked Iran to return an American surveillance drone that the Iranians say they captured on Dec. 4. It was Mr. Obama’s first public comment about the drone, a remote-controlled spying aircraft,...
...Obama was answering this question: “And speaking of Iran, are you concerned that it will be able to weaken America’s national security by discovering intelligence from the fallen drone that it captured?”
Obama Says America Asked Iran to Return Its Drone



See if you can explain why Hussein gave Iran out latest technology in that drone.



Or......run from this example as well.
 

Forum List

Back
Top