Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,610
The New York Times‘ David Sanger and Choe Sang-Hun (1/5/16) say that if North Korea’s claim to have successfully tested a hydrogen bomb is true, that would “dramatically escalate the nuclear challenge from one of the world’s most isolated and dangerous states.” But they don’t say why.
Fusion-based hydrogen bombs have more explosive power than nuclear fission bombs that rely on uranium or plutonium. “If the North Korean claim about a hydrogen bomb is true, this test was of a different, and significantly more threatening, nature,” the Times reports. It’s not made clear, though, what if anything North Korea could achieve by having a bomb that could destroy a city and its suburbs rather than just a city, or how the response by the US and its allies to such a threat would be in any way different.
Nor does the Times‘ front-page story point out how unlikely it is that North Korea has, in fact, detonated a hydrogen bomb. “Detection devices around the world had picked up a 5.1 seismic event along the country’s northeast coast,” the Sanger/Sang-Hun article reported–using a number that is unlikely to mean much to many readers. A Q&A on the Times‘ website (1/6/16) does more to put the story in context:
There’s No Evidence North Korea Has an H-Bomb–but NYT Knows Fear Sells Papers
Reason number 552 NYT sucks.
Fusion-based hydrogen bombs have more explosive power than nuclear fission bombs that rely on uranium or plutonium. “If the North Korean claim about a hydrogen bomb is true, this test was of a different, and significantly more threatening, nature,” the Times reports. It’s not made clear, though, what if anything North Korea could achieve by having a bomb that could destroy a city and its suburbs rather than just a city, or how the response by the US and its allies to such a threat would be in any way different.
Nor does the Times‘ front-page story point out how unlikely it is that North Korea has, in fact, detonated a hydrogen bomb. “Detection devices around the world had picked up a 5.1 seismic event along the country’s northeast coast,” the Sanger/Sang-Hun article reported–using a number that is unlikely to mean much to many readers. A Q&A on the Times‘ website (1/6/16) does more to put the story in context:
There’s No Evidence North Korea Has an H-Bomb–but NYT Knows Fear Sells Papers
Reason number 552 NYT sucks.