Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you seriously going to keep defending this position? You've been proven wrong. Maybe it's time to just let it go?Yeeeeeeaaahhh, no. The Tomahawk will hit the door. Even the unitary 1000 pound warhead will wreck whatever is inside.
Nope. Tomahawk missiles are low yield and high explosive. They wont bust through several feet of reinforced armor designed specifically for that type of attack.
The uneducated are always under the impression that big explosion = big penetration. Reality check: It doesn't.
Hate to tell you...but the Pentagon is already saying that the airfield is "Severely Damage" if not "Destroyed."
The airfield was 'severely damaged.' Not the airbase. Not the aircraft. They probably just messed up some concrete.
By the way, the pentagon is wrong 100% of the time in its first public intelligence briefings. This has been the reality of the past few decades.
The pentagon is wrong by 100%. The hell are you smoking?Hate to tell you...but the Pentagon is already saying that the airfield is "Severely Damage" if not "Destroyed."
The airfield was 'severely damaged.' Not the airbase. Not the aircraft. They probably just messed up some concrete.
By the way, the pentagon is wrong 100% of the time in its first public intelligence briefings. This has been the reality of the past few decades.
You got links to back your bullshit?Hate to tell you...but the Pentagon is already saying that the airfield is "Severely Damage" if not "Destroyed."
The airfield was 'severely damaged.' Not the airbase. Not the aircraft. They probably just messed up some concrete.
By the way, the pentagon is wrong 100% of the time in its first public intelligence briefings. This has been the reality of the past few decades.
Wrong, a Tomahawk can fly right in the door which is the weakest part, they carry a 1,000 pound warhead and would do the trick. They know how everything is laid out with satellite images and they can be programed to +/- 3 feet.
If the door is several feet of reinforced armor, then no. The door would absorb the explosion.
photo of destroyed syrian air field - Google Searchtell me, Most runways for larger air craft and military use are 3-6 feet thick and re-enforced... How do you suppose they destroyed the runways? The bunker is a zit on the ass compared to that runway.The purpose of the strike was to destroy the airfield so Assad couldn't launch any more attacks from there.
This was a critical blow! It will be at least one week before they repave the runway.
And the buildings used to maintain the aircraft. Tools and parts.Hate to tell you...but the Pentagon is already saying that the airfield is "Severely Damage" if not "Destroyed."
The airfield was 'severely damaged.' Not the airbase. Not the aircraft. They probably just messed up some concrete.
By the way, the pentagon is wrong 100% of the time in its first public intelligence briefings. This has been the reality of the past few decades.
No, not the runway, the airfield meaning the buildings they targeted that held the fuel, aircraft, and munitions.
No, they specifically said "the Eastern Mediterranean." And even if it was, 300 miles for a missile that has an effective range of 1,000 miles is no big deal.
12 min flight time.."Several hours"? Are you a moron? The projected flight time of a ICBM from Kansas to Moscow is only 4 hours! "Several hours"? damn.60 rockets coming in with an average flight time of 14 minutes so you are NOT going to have time to hide shit.
WTF are you talking about? If this attack was carried out several hundred miles away, then it would of taken several hours.
And if a chemical attack was carried out from this airbase, then they would of hid the aircraft immediately after the attack. It's just common sense.
It was 120 miles. They fly at 500mph.
Tomahawks have a 99% reliability rating .. Best in the world for that kind of weapon..No, they specifically said "the Eastern Mediterranean." And even if it was, 300 miles for a missile that has an effective range of 1,000 miles is no big deal.
Like I said, it was probably several hundreds miles west of Cyprus. There is no way it was between Cyprus and Syria, as that would of been too high profile and intercepted during the first several launches.
Effective range for missiles works differently than the effective range for a firearm or tank cannon. They are prone to breaking down and going off course during their travel, which is why it is highly implausible that all 50-60 of them hit their targets.
No, they specifically said "the Eastern Mediterranean." And even if it was, 300 miles for a missile that has an effective range of 1,000 miles is no big deal.
Like I said, it was probably several hundreds miles west of Cyprus. There is no way it was between Cyprus and Syria, as that would of been too high profile and intercepted during the first several launches.
Effective range for missiles works differently than the effective range for a firearm or tank cannon. They are prone to breaking down and going off course during their travel, which is why it is highly implausible that all 50-60 of them hit their targets.
"Several hours"? Are you a moron? The projected flight time of a ICBM from Kansas to Moscow is only 4 hours! "Several hours"? damn.
No, they specifically said "the Eastern Mediterranean." And even if it was, 300 miles for a missile that has an effective range of 1,000 miles is no big deal.
Like I said, it was probably several hundreds miles west of Cyprus. There is no way it was between Cyprus and Syria, as that would of been too high profile and intercepted during the first several launches.
Effective range for missiles works differently than the effective range for a firearm or tank cannon. They are prone to breaking down and going off course during their travel, which is why it is highly implausible that all 50-60 of them hit their targets.
Who cares? They flew to the target and blew it to hell.
That's yet to be proven. I bet my wallet no aircraft were destroyed.
It doesn't matter if they detected them. The U.S. told Russia beforehand what they were doing, do you NOT think Russia didn't tell Syria what was going on? The cruise missiles have anti-jamming equipment on them and Syria couldn't do shit about it.
60 rockets coming in with an average flight time of 14 minutes so you are NOT going to have time to hide shit.
WTF are you talking about? If this attack was carried out several hundred miles away, then it would of taken several hours.
And if a chemical attack was carried out from this airbase, then they would of hid the aircraft immediately after the attack. It's just common sense.
