this looks like Parliament.

[Auld Phart]

and it's something else we apparently inherited from Britain.

What do you think, Tommy Tainant ?

 

[Concerned American]

View attachment 938038

and it's something else we apparently inherited from Britain.

What do you think, Tommy Tainant ?

And wasn't this country founded as a result of excess taxation? Worse is the fact that they've spent $34T and counting over and above what they've already spent. Cause "they're the tax man"

 

[Donald H]

and it's something else we apparently inherited from Britain.

What do you think, Tommy Tainant ?

Il's not a good time to criticize any parliamentary system.

Americans are horribly confused on both sides by the lack of an answer on whether or not their president should be granted the absolute power of a dictator.

The confusion is quite valid too, because of the impossible task of separating a president's personal business from his official business as a president!

This unsolvable situation exists because of the Fanding Fouthers inability to invent some measures to deal with corrupt and criminal president.

England was able to stop chopping off crowned heads by making the monarchy symbolic and powerless.

America failed to deal with corrupt criminal presidents.

The reason why it has to be dealt with: An attempted coup always has to be dealt with by immediate action taken by the military to eliminate the leader of treason from within! No action was taken!

And thus the election was stolen!

 

[Concerned American]

Il's not a good time to criticize any parliamentary system.

Americans are horribly confused on both sides by the lack of an answer on whether or not their president should be granted the absolute power of a dictator.

The confusion is quite valid too, because of the impossible task of separating a president's personal business from his official business as a president!

This unsolvable situation exists because of the Fanding Fouthers inability to invent some measures to deal with corrupt and criminal president.

England was able to stop chopping off crowned heads by making the monarchy symbolic and powerless.

America failed to deal with corrupt criminal presidents.

STFU, duck. You're an ignoramus. We have processes in place to deal with presidential "high crimes and misdemeanors" It is called impeachment. The liberal justices on the SCOTUS, like you are trying to deflect. Now run along and keep your nose in Ottawa. We don't need your advice. Your country is proof that you have no answers.

 

[Donald H]

and it's something else we apparently inherited from Britain.

What do you think, Tommy Tainant ?

Don't abandon the discussion AF, it's completely valid on account of current confusion in the Scotus.

America is in the process of learning that the highest of crimes committed by a president can't be allowed to simmer on the back burner.

America is either going to deal with a stolen election or it's going to have to deal with an attempt to steal an election! ['b]

Both side's attempts to impeach a 'bad' apple president have failed and will always fail.

The opportunity of resorting to England's old solution of Chop, chop should have never been passed up in either case!

 

[Concerned American]

Don't abandon the discussion AF, it's completely valid on account of current confusion in the Scotus.

America is in the process of learning that the highest of crimes committed by a president can't be allowed to simmer on the back burner.

America is either going to deal with a stolen election or it's going to have to deal with an attempt to steal an election! ['b]

Both side's attempts to impeach a 'bad' apple president have failed and will always fail.

The opportunity of resorting to England's old solution of Chop, chop should have never been passed up in either case!

Keep running your mouth duck. Your ignorance of US history fits in with your ignorance of math, science, world affairs and a myriad of others I'm sure. Research the Nixon impeachment, moron.