Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
That's easy.
It says you created this thread back on June 27th.
It says you created this thread back on June 27th.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Some metaphysicists (metaphysicians? whatever.) went as far to say that all of science might never be able to be understood!! Others said, balderdash! ("Balderdash was a common explicative at that time.) But still there is the possibility that the future Theory Of Everything may not be approachable with known mathematical concepts. Maybe a Mathematical Uncertainty Principle?Even I'm not nuts enough to go beyond the surface of such abstractions. Sheer masochism! While I applaud their efforts.. better them than me! That said, limiting oneself, for example, to just arithmetic or to only using "natural numbers" seem like such a highly unnatural conditions that one should expect strange consequences like having to go beyond the set to prove what may hold within the set or something. Drawing parallels to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle might come in handy. Maybe not..
.Some metaphysicists (metaphysicians? whatever.) went as far to say that all of science might never be able to be understood!! Others said, balderdash! ("Balderdash was a common explicative at that time.) But still there is the possibility that the future Theory Of Everything may not be approachable with known mathematical concepts. Maybe a Mathematical Uncertainty Principle?
(Thanks for that.)regressive nut's as usual are the obstacle for understanding the life of the universe.
My comments were strictly limited to the mathematics of the hard sciences -- Quantum Electrodynamics, the Standard Model of particle physics, etc..
have they an equation for the first cellular organism, certainly not all mathematical - for any complex organism would be an equation to fill a 10000 page document.
the final frontier of science will be the understanding of the spiritual content of the metaphysical physiology that has evolved - forces as gravity and the creation of matter and energy will be involved and has yet to have barely begun - with any results.
regressive nut's as usual are the obstacle for understanding the life of the universe.
You couldn’t tell, but what would be the point of lying to us about how things got started?In this experiment, there was no universe and therefore nothing existed 11 minutes ago. No matter, no energy, no physical space.
Then God created the universe 10 minutes ago, exactly as it is right now, with all the evidence it's billions of years old built-in, with the light from distant stars created in transit, and us with all our memories of a lifetime in place.
Now...how could you disprove this? NOTE: Emotions are not proof. Hostility to God and insistence He's not real is not proof.
.(Thanks for that.)
It's the same insect..
.
that is not correct - through visual observation alone -
.
View attachment 527635
.
the cicada above transforms its metaphysical physiology including the brain from one being to another while maintaining its spiritual content in suspension while the process takes place -
evolution can not be understood without the recognition each being is composed of both a physical, metaphysical physiology not native to planet Earth but from the universe itself and the spiritual content required for the physiology to reproduce itself in accordance to its continued existence.
.It's the same insect.
There is no magical transformation.
The butterfly and the caterpillar it came from have the exact same DNA
What we call spirit or soul or whatever is nothing but a function of the mind. The mind is of the brain and the brain is of the body.
There is no magical transformation.
.the cicada above transforms its metaphysical physiology including the brain from one being into another while maintaining its spiritual content in suspension while the process takes place -
{...}The 13- or 17-year lifespan of periodical cicadas is one of the longest of any insect, but only a tiny fraction of that time is spent above ground. The rest of a periodical cicada’s life is spent underground as a nymph feeding on liquid sucked from plant roots. Over their many years beneath the soil, the nymphs shed their exoskeletons, a process known as molting, five times.
Miraculously:Once topside, the nymphs climb up into the trees where they proceed to plant themselves on a branch and transform into winged adults by once again shedding their exoskeletons. At first, the red-eyed adults are a ghostly white with soft, curled-up wings unfit for flight, but their bodies soon harden and turn black and the now rigid wings can finally float the chunky two-inch bug into the air.
You can't prove "it" so why do I have to disprove "it?"In this experiment, there was no universe and therefore nothing existed 11 minutes ago. No matter, no energy, no physical space.
Then God created the universe 10 minutes ago, exactly as it is right now, with all the evidence it's billions of years old built-in, with the light from distant stars created in transit, and us with all our memories of a lifetime in place.
Now...how could you disprove this? NOTE: Emotions are not proof. Hostility to God and insistence He's not real is not proof.
And has nothing to do with a bug..
.
that's your scenario - magical
.
View attachment 528528
.
but no - the process for the physiology and its spiritual content exists and is an observable, real life occurrence and demonstrates both the physical, physiology as a metaphysical substance and the spiritual content necessary for the physiology to exist. - as an example of the mechanism for evolution and evolutionary progression.
there is no physical brain that remains the same during the transformation their entire physiology is reconfigured from solid to solution to solid - and is coordinated during the process by the spiritual content the physiology is dependent on throughout its existence or will perish to return to the atmosphere it came from.
.Meanwhile, back in reality:
{...}
Miraculously:
A Fungus Causes Cicadas to Mate Like Crazy, Even After Their Butts Fall Off
And now scientists think they know whywww.smithsonianmag.com
.... and transform into winged adults
.There is no spiritual thing that is in play at all because as we know a traumatic brain injury can permanently alter the function of the brain to the point where the higher functions of the brain no longer operate.
Assuming cns means consciousness… All living things by definition have some level of consciousness. They don’t necessarily all have a conscience..
.
the transformation into an avian being is not molting which in the text by - blues man - would use the existing cns in the transformation - the cns (brain) itself in transformation is liquefied and reformed - by the beings spiritual content in control of the process during the transition.
and is the means employed for evolution and evolutionary progressions beyond the single being affecting the metaphysical physiology once established.
.
.
.
flora for one, half the species on planet Earth have no cns whatsoever - their physiology obviously has a spiritual content same as fauna as both are inseparable creating the individual living being.
.
View attachment 528892
.
metaphysical physiology and its spiritual content are inseparable at its lowest level in a coma state they will persist when eventually the spiritual component perishes the physiology dissipates back into the atmosphere.
unless you doubt evolution occurs and progression of each species without that particular brand being in control of their own destiny. you then deny your own identity.
- lowlife, blues man, eats meat not a cow.
.Assuming cns means consciousness… All living things by definition have some level of consciousness. They don’t necessarily all have a conscience.
But putting this aside is this stuff you have made up on your own or is this something you learned from someone else.