Thousands of families cross southern border despite "zero tolerance"

  • A study published by a Columbia University political scientist tracked incidence rates for voter fraud for two years, and found that the rare fraud that was reported generally could be traced to “false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief and administrative or voter error.”
NEXT CONTESTANT
It is a general axiom that if you don't want to find a thing, you won't.

so are RW talking points - if you want people to believe something is wrong just lie about it, and keep repeating the lie for several years.
It is what you leftists do all the time.

A left-wing school, with left-wing professors, looking into voter fraud when the possible outcome would be eliminating possible votes that go to progressives. Yeah, there is no potential for massaging the numbers there.


riiiiiiiiiight

I noticed a leftist started this thread

:rolleyes:
 
'In July, 9,258 family members were caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally, according to Customs and Border Protection data released today — not quite 200 fewer than the month before and a record high for July since at least 2012.

Why it matters: The Trump administration's family separation policy does not seem to have had its intended deterrent effect. The numbers highlight the desperation of many migrant families, risking family separation to escape their plight at home. And while the overall number of arrests along the border were lower, they're in line with past years — with the exception of 2017's statistical anomaly.'

Thousands of families cross southern border despite "zero tolerance"

So much for Trump's sick, border family, separation policy to try and dissuade other families from illegally crossing.

Inhumane moron.
Execute them then -- something needs to be done to deter them, execution is a good deterrent.

I know plenty of white supremacists who would love to volunteer to serve on the illegal immigrant execution squad
 
Here we go. Democrats don't care about child trafficking as long as they can get the illegals voting for them.

Migrants, young and old, are not always related. Border Patrol says fear of child trafficking forces separations

Migrants, young and old, are not always related. Border Patrol says fear of child trafficking forces separations

Here we go.
Democrats don't care about child trafficking as long as they can get the illegals voting for them.

So this is your opinion. I care about human trafficking and I'm a Democrat.
 
  • A study published by a Columbia University political scientist tracked incidence rates for voter fraud for two years, and found that the rare fraud that was reported generally could be traced to “false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief and administrative or voter error.”
NEXT CONTESTANT
It is a general axiom that if you don't want to find a thing, you won't.

so are RW talking points - if you want people to believe something is wrong just lie about it, and keep repeating the lie for several years.
It is what you leftists do all the time.

A left-wing school, with left-wing professors, looking into voter fraud when the possible outcome would be eliminating possible votes that go to progressives. Yeah, there is no potential for massaging the numbers there.


riiiiiiiiiight

I noticed a leftist started this thread

:rolleyes:
What is so hard to understand? By the same reasons you progressives don't accept environmental studies by oil companies, I don't accept studies from leftist universities.


As I've said in the past; the only research I buy into is research that started out as something else and by accident, discovered something. For instance, the research starts out as a way to chemically treat an algae bloom, but during the course of the research, the data shows that a specific plant can cure some forms of cancer.

No agenda to that kind of research. Humanities research is just agendas.

If someone doesn't want to find something......they won't. Plain fact.
 
'
So much for Trump's sick, border family, separation policy to try and dissuade other families from illegally crossing.
Exactly why do liberals like you want to encourage illegals to violate the border and further burden the U.S. taxpayer to house and feed them? ... :dunno:
 
  • A study published by a Columbia University political scientist tracked incidence rates for voter fraud for two years, and found that the rare fraud that was reported generally could be traced to “false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief and administrative or voter error.”
NEXT CONTESTANT
It is a general axiom that if you don't want to find a thing, you won't.

so are RW talking points - if you want people to believe something is wrong just lie about it, and keep repeating the lie for several years.
It is what you leftists do all the time.

A left-wing school, with left-wing professors, looking into voter fraud when the possible outcome would be eliminating possible votes that go to progressives. Yeah, there is no potential for massaging the numbers there.


riiiiiiiiiight

I noticed a leftist started this thread

:rolleyes:
What is so hard to understand? By the same reasons you progressives don't accept environmental studies by oil companies, I don't accept studies from leftist universities.


As I've said in the past; the only research I buy into is research that started out as something else and by accident, discovered something. For instance, the research starts out as a way to chemically treat an algae bloom, but during the course of the research, the data shows that a specific plant can cure some forms of cancer.

No agenda to that kind of research. Humanities research is just agendas.

If someone doesn't want to find something......they won't. Plain fact.

I understand you offer no actual proof other than your opinion - thats what I understand
 
Never heard of Adlai Stevenson, have you?
Over 100,000 fraudulent votes.
Or John C. Moretina. His fraudulent vote gave a win with a one point advantage to his candidate of choice.

And there are others.


Oh, and by the way, 8 should have opened the study, as you seemed to miss this. I am happy to see some truth from them-

Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies. We need better data, better election administration, transparency and more responsible journalism to improve public understanding of the legitimate ways in which electoral outcomes can be distorted and manipulated. This will help ensure that new laws and rules to prevent fraud are narrowly targeted to solve legitimate problems rather than used as a strategy to shape the electorate for partisan advantage.
Here we go. Democrats don't care about child trafficking as long as they can get the illegals voting for them.

Migrants, young and old, are not always related. Border Patrol says fear of child trafficking forces separations

Migrants, young and old, are not always related. Border Patrol says fear of child trafficking forces separations


bullshit - theres no significant number of illegals voting. The last place they want to be is in a place whee they can be checked by ANYONE ....

You think poll officials are calling the police if an illegal alien tries to vote? LOL!

Illegals dont come here to vote, they come to get a job.

voter fraud isnt relevant .... FACT.

Get a job, steal an ID...…..but never vote. Right.

name one election where voter fraud made any significant difference .. one.
 
Last edited:
Never heard of Adlai Stevenson, have you?
Over 100,000 fraudulent votes.
Or John C. Moretina. His fraudulent vote gave a win with a one point advantage to his candidate of choice.

And there are others.


Oh, and by the way, 8 should have opened the study, as you seemed to miss this. I am happy to see some truth from them-

Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies. We need better data, better election administration, transparency and more responsible journalism to improve public understanding of the legitimate ways in which electoral outcomes can be distorted and manipulated. This will help ensure that new laws and rules to prevent fraud are narrowly targeted to solve legitimate problems rather than used as a strategy to shape the electorate for partisan advantage.
bullshit - theres no significant number of illegals voting. The last place they want to be is in a place whee they can be checked by ANYONE ....

You think poll officials are calling the police if an illegal alien tries to vote? LOL!

Illegals dont come here to vote, they come to get a job.

voter fraud isnt relevant .... FACT.

Get a job, steal an ID...…..but never vote. Right.

name one election where voter fraud made any significant difference .. one.


still no proof eh sport -

try this one on for size ....
  • A 2011 study by the Republican National Lawyers Association found that, between 2000 and 2010, 21 states had 1 or 0 convictions for voter fraud or other kinds of voting irregularities.
 
No, you are too lazy to look up the names I gave you.
Never heard of Adlai Stevenson, have you?
Over 100,000 fraudulent votes.
Or John C. Moretina. His fraudulent vote gave a win with a one point advantage to his candidate of choice.

And there are others.


Oh, and by the way, 8 should have opened the study, as you seemed to miss this. I am happy to see some truth from them-

Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies. We need better data, better election administration, transparency and more responsible journalism to improve public understanding of the legitimate ways in which electoral outcomes can be distorted and manipulated. This will help ensure that new laws and rules to prevent fraud are narrowly targeted to solve legitimate problems rather than used as a strategy to shape the electorate for partisan advantage.
You think poll officials are calling the police if an illegal alien tries to vote? LOL!

Illegals dont come here to vote, they come to get a job.

voter fraud isnt relevant .... FACT.

Get a job, steal an ID...…..but never vote. Right.

name one election where voter fraud made any significant difference .. one.


still no proof eh sport -

try this one on for size ....
  • A 2011 study by the Republican National Lawyers Association found that, between 2000 and 2010, 21 states had 1 or 0 convictions for voter fraud or other kinds of voting irregularities.
 
Why don't they cross at a designated port of entry and apply for asylum? Why become an illegal when there is a completely legal way via the port of entry?
 
No, you are too lazy to look up the names I gave you.
Never heard of Adlai Stevenson, have you?
Over 100,000 fraudulent votes.
Or John C. Moretina. His fraudulent vote gave a win with a one point advantage to his candidate of choice.

And there are others.


Oh, and by the way, 8 should have opened the study, as you seemed to miss this. I am happy to see some truth from them-

Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies. We need better data, better election administration, transparency and more responsible journalism to improve public understanding of the legitimate ways in which electoral outcomes can be distorted and manipulated. This will help ensure that new laws and rules to prevent fraud are narrowly targeted to solve legitimate problems rather than used as a strategy to shape the electorate for partisan advantage.
Illegals dont come here to vote, they come to get a job.

voter fraud isnt relevant .... FACT.

Get a job, steal an ID...…..but never vote. Right.

name one election where voter fraud made any significant difference .. one.


still no proof eh sport -

try this one on for size ....
  • A 2011 study by the Republican National Lawyers Association found that, between 2000 and 2010, 21 states had 1 or 0 convictions for voter fraud or other kinds of voting irregularities.

its up to you to prove your claim jusyt like I'm doing ....

or

STFU
 
  • A 2014 study by the non-partisan Government Accountability Office, which reflected a literature review of the existing research on voter fraud, noted that the studies consistently found “few instances of in-person voter fraud.”
 
No, it is up to you to prove your claim there never had been. I disproved your claim, but you are too lazy to look them up.

Here, I’ll help that lazy hand of yours-
http://voterintegrityproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Chicagos-massive-voter-fraud-trials.pdf

Voter Fraud Changed the Outcome of a Missouri Election | National Review
Candidate's uncle gets probation in voting fraud case

No, you are too lazy to look up the names I gave you.
Never heard of Adlai Stevenson, have you?
Over 100,000 fraudulent votes.
Or John C. Moretina. His fraudulent vote gave a win with a one point advantage to his candidate of choice.

And there are others.


Oh, and by the way, 8 should have opened the study, as you seemed to miss this. I am happy to see some truth from them-

Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies. We need better data, better election administration, transparency and more responsible journalism to improve public understanding of the legitimate ways in which electoral outcomes can be distorted and manipulated. This will help ensure that new laws and rules to prevent fraud are narrowly targeted to solve legitimate problems rather than used as a strategy to shape the electorate for partisan advantage.
Get a job, steal an ID...…..but never vote. Right.

name one election where voter fraud made any significant difference .. one.


still no proof eh sport -

try this one on for size ....
  • A 2011 study by the Republican National Lawyers Association found that, between 2000 and 2010, 21 states had 1 or 0 convictions for voter fraud or other kinds of voting irregularities.

its up to you to prove your claim jusyt like I'm doing ....

or

STFU
 
No, it is up to you to prove your claim there never had been. I disproved your claim, but you are too lazy to look them up.

Here, I’ll help that lazy hand of yours-
http://voterintegrityproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Chicagos-massive-voter-fraud-trials.pdf

Voter Fraud Changed the Outcome of a Missouri Election | National Review
Candidate's uncle gets probation in voting fraud case

No, you are too lazy to look up the names I gave you.
Never heard of Adlai Stevenson, have you?
Over 100,000 fraudulent votes.
Or John C. Moretina. His fraudulent vote gave a win with a one point advantage to his candidate of choice.

And there are others.


Oh, and by the way, 8 should have opened the study, as you seemed to miss this. I am happy to see some truth from them-

Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies. We need better data, better election administration, transparency and more responsible journalism to improve public understanding of the legitimate ways in which electoral outcomes can be distorted and manipulated. This will help ensure that new laws and rules to prevent fraud are narrowly targeted to solve legitimate problems rather than used as a strategy to shape the electorate for partisan advantage.
name one election where voter fraud made any significant difference .. one.


still no proof eh sport -

try this one on for size ....
  • A 2011 study by the Republican National Lawyers Association found that, between 2000 and 2010, 21 states had 1 or 0 convictions for voter fraud or other kinds of voting irregularities.

its up to you to prove your claim jusyt like I'm doing ....

or

STFU


one case is almost THOUSANDS if your an idiot ...

John C. Moretina

has been sentenced to five years of probation for violating federal election law, according to the U.S. attorney’s office.

Moretina had earlier entered a guilty plea to fraudulently registering to vote in July 2010, in what was then the 40th Missouri House district.


totally irrelevant ^^^^^^^^^^^^

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

BW dumbass - not one of the links I posted claimed there wasnt isolated cases.

keep trying though.
 
It is a general axiom that if you don't want to find a thing, you won't.

so are RW talking points - if you want people to believe something is wrong just lie about it, and keep repeating the lie for several years.
It is what you leftists do all the time.

A left-wing school, with left-wing professors, looking into voter fraud when the possible outcome would be eliminating possible votes that go to progressives. Yeah, there is no potential for massaging the numbers there.


riiiiiiiiiight

I noticed a leftist started this thread

:rolleyes:
What is so hard to understand? By the same reasons you progressives don't accept environmental studies by oil companies, I don't accept studies from leftist universities.


As I've said in the past; the only research I buy into is research that started out as something else and by accident, discovered something. For instance, the research starts out as a way to chemically treat an algae bloom, but during the course of the research, the data shows that a specific plant can cure some forms of cancer.

No agenda to that kind of research. Humanities research is just agendas.

If someone doesn't want to find something......they won't. Plain fact.

I understand you offer no actual proof other than your opinion - thats what I understand
And you are offering nothing but opinion as well.
 
Here's another one --

US Officials Arrest Illegal Alien Trying to Sneak Into Country With Little Girl He Claims Is His Daughter;
She's Actually Not His Daughter, But an Unrelated Girl He Was Sexually Abusing

Ace of Spades HQ

Prediction: this will not get even 0.0001% of the coverage, including from the nominal right, that "baby jails" and "infant prisons" got.

U.S. officials have arrested an illegal alien for multiple counts of rape after he tried to gain entry to the United States with a child he claimed was his daughter, a DHS official said in a Tuesday statement.
A DHS official noted that the illegal alien, Ramon Pedro, arrived with a young girl he claimed was his daughter at the Ysleta Port of Entry in Texas in mid-April.

After Pedro and his claimed daughter was hospitalized for tuberculosis testing in July, U.S. authorities discovered she was not only not related to him in any way but was being systematically sexually abused by him.

"In fact, the victim’s mother told her daughter to accompany Pedro to the United States and he would secure her employment," a DHS official said, adding that "on July 27, 2018, the Huron Police Department arrested him for multiple felony offenses for rape, oral copulation, forcible sexual penetration and endangering/causing injury to a child. He is currently detained in Fresno County Jail on a $310,000 bond."




But let's just keep on assuming -- or pretending -- that all kids crossing the border with adults are the children of those adults. Pretending away real problems concerning immigration really worked like the Dickens in Britain.




Go easy. The illegal only wanted an oppertunity to rape American kids and pick lettuce. Illegal dude should go to,Philly. The Mayer loves illegal Mexican kid molesters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top