Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[DiveCon]

It cannot be a floor because it has no where to fall from and it is too thick.

where is your concrete core, chris?

The proportioning is not right with the columns and spaces between them and they are not bonafied images of the Twins.



If they were, they do not look into the core anyway. WTC 1 had quite a distance between the interior box columns and concrete core because of the taper to the concrete walls.

Light can be seen between the interior box columns and core face in his noon silhouette.

So if it is one of the Twins, that is what it is.

and that photo disproves your stupid concrete core, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

The proportioning is not right with the columns and spaces between them and they are not bonafied images of the Twins.

bullshit. its from a documentary on the history channel aired in 2001 before 9/11.

If they were, they do not look into the core anyway. WTC 1 had quite a distance between the interior box columns and concrete core because of the taper to the concrete walls.

where are you getting your information from, chris? are you just making this up as you go along again? you fucked up again. the pictures look right THROUGH where you claim your concrete core was. you said the columns were attached to the concrete core. WELL WHERE THE FUCK IS IT?!!!

Light can be seen between the interior box columns and core face in his noon silhouette.

So if it is one of the Twins, that is what it is.

you are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic was taken at noon??

anyway, thanks for proving there was no concrete core. that photo absolutely proves there was no concrete core.

 

[Christophera]

The proportioning is not right with the columns and spaces between them and they are not bonafied images of the Twins.

bullshit. its from a documentary on the history channel aired in 2001 before 9/11.

If they were, they do not look into the core anyway. WTC 1 had quite a distance between the interior box columns and concrete core because of the taper to the concrete walls.

where are you getting your information from, chris? are you just making this up as you go along again? you fucked up again. the pictures look right THROUGH where you claim your concrete core was. you said the columns were attached to the concrete core. WELL WHERE THE FUCK IS IT?!!!

Light can be seen between the interior box columns and core face in his noon silhouette.

So if it is one of the Twins, that is what it is.

you are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic was taken at noon??

anyway, thanks for proving there was no concrete core. that photo absolutely proves there was no concrete core.

You are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic showed steel core columns? That's too small for structural steel. It's rebar.

anyway, thanks for proving there were no steel core columns. that photo absolutely proves there was no steel columns in the core.

BTW, approximatly noon.

 

[DiveCon]

The proportioning is not right with the columns and spaces between them and they are not bonafied images of the Twins.

bullshit. its from a documentary on the history channel aired in 2001 before 9/11.


where are you getting your information from, chris? are you just making this up as you go along again? you fucked up again. the pictures look right THROUGH where you claim your concrete core was. you said the columns were attached to the concrete core. WELL WHERE THE FUCK IS IT?!!!

Light can be seen between the interior box columns and core face in his noon silhouette.

So if it is one of the Twins, that is what it is.

you are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic was taken at noon??

anyway, thanks for proving there was no concrete core. that photo absolutely proves there was no concrete core.

You are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic showed steel core columns? That's too small for structural steel. It's rebar.

anyway, thanks for proving there were no steel core columns. that photo absolutely proves there was no steel columns in the core.

holy shit you are too fucking stupid

 

[Christophera]

bullshit. its from a documentary on the history channel aired in 2001 before 9/11.


where are you getting your information from, chris? are you just making this up as you go along again? you fucked up again. the pictures look right THROUGH where you claim your concrete core was. you said the columns were attached to the concrete core. WELL WHERE THE FUCK IS IT?!!!



you are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic was taken at noon??

anyway, thanks for proving there was no concrete core. that photo absolutely proves there was no concrete core.

You are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic showed steel core columns? That's too small for structural steel. It's rebar.

anyway, thanks for proving there were no steel core columns. that photo absolutely proves there was no steel columns in the core.

holy shit you are too fucking stupid

I realized your self hatred was great so I copied your words, revised and made them true.

Agent . . . you have no purpose in an American place except against the interests the people have in lawful government.

The silhouette photo shows concrete because of a slight taper leaving a sliver of light at the top off the side of the core between it and the interior box column.

 

[DiveCon]

You are just making shit up again!! where did you get the info that this pic showed steel core columns? That's too small for structural steel. It's rebar.

anyway, thanks for proving there were no steel core columns. that photo absolutely proves there was no steel columns in the core.

holy shit you are too fucking stupid

I realized your self hatred was great so I copied your words, revised and made them true.

Agent . . . you have no purpose in an American place except against the interests the people have in lawful government.

The silhouette photo shows concrete because of a slight taper leaving a sliver of light at the top off the side of the core between it and the interior box column.

you are so fucked up you cant even keep track of who says what
and you are fucking insane if you still think there was a concrete core in the WTC, there wasnt any and that has been shown over and over yet you persist with your delusions
i can't keep saying you are lying anymore, because it is clear you REALLY do think thats what is seen, so you are just another delusional fucktard

 

[Christophera]

Clearly, there are massive VERIFICATIONS of the concrete core. You've never posted an image of your supposed steel core columns.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

The west concrete wall of the WTC 1 core standing to the left of the spire.

The spire was the north end interior box column of the west side exterior steel framework supporting floors, one of 24 surrounding the rectangular concrete tubular core as the inner wall of the exterior steel.

 

[DiveCon]

Clearly, there are massive VERIFICATIONS of the concrete core. You've never posted an image of your supposed steel core columns.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

The west concrete wall of the WTC 1 core standing to the left of the spire.



The spire was the north end interior box column of the west side exterior steel framework supporting floors, one of 24 surrounding the rectangular concrete tubular core as the inner wall of the exterior steel.

complete and total BULLSHIT

 

[Christophera]

Clearly, there are massive VERIFICATIONS of the concrete core. You've never posted an image of your supposed steel core columns.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

The west concrete wall of the WTC 1 core standing to the left of the spire.



The spire was the north end interior box column of the west side exterior steel framework supporting floors, one of 24 surrounding the rectangular concrete tubular core as the inner wall of the exterior steel.

complete and total BULLSHIT

FEMA says this is the core

but on 9-11 we see this,

complete and total BULLSHIT

 

[DiveCon]

Clearly, there are massive VERIFICATIONS of the concrete core. You've never posted an image of your supposed steel core columns.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

The west concrete wall of the WTC 1 core standing to the left of the spire.



The spire was the north end interior box column of the west side exterior steel framework supporting floors, one of 24 surrounding the rectangular concrete tubular core as the inner wall of the exterior steel.

complete and total BULLSHIT

FEMA says this is the core


but on 9-11 we see this,


complete and total BULLSHIT

you FINALLY got something right
all your posts are complete and total BULLSHIT

 

[Fizz]

Clearly, there are massive VERIFICATIONS of the concrete core. You've never posted an image of your supposed steel core columns.

we dont need to post them. you post pics of the steel core columns in the core area all the time!!

Robertson

you lie and attribute something the reporter said to robertson. absolute proof yo uare a lying sack of shit.

is verified by Oxford,

oxford uses the WTC as an example of a skyscraper. it doesnt say the WTC had a concrete core!!

verifying Domel who describes a concrete core

you are right. domel was doing a study on the effects of workers at the WTC. he was not doing a study on the construction of the towers at all. he just mentions in passing and in error that it had a concrete core.

verified by the image of WTC 2 core,

no concrete core in your picture.

verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3,

thats clearly a piece of the floor. you can see the trusses. you are a lying sack of shit.

the WTC 1 rebar,

no rebar in your picture.

just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then,

no core wall is seen. only a delusional person would insist they see it!!

the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with http://algoxy.com/psych/images/shearspirewall.jpg

there is no concrete core and your picture doesnt show any concrete core wall

interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall

,

hey look!! the steel core!!! no concrete, jackass

consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick,

where's your fucking concrete? where's your rebar?!!

all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

there was no evidence of high explosives found. you can hear that there are no high explosives used in this video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOGI33HsiCc&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - WTC Collapse Best Angle - InfoDebug.com[/ame]

The west concrete wall of the WTC 1 core standing to the left of the spire.

HAHAHAHAHahahahaha!!! there's no concrete wall there!!!

The spire was the north end interior box column of the west side exterior steel framework supporting floors, one of 24 surrounding the rectangular concrete tubular core as the inner wall of the exterior steel.

wrong, you lying sack of shit. the spire was the two center rows of the steel core. your claim (the one that you simply fabricated, apparently) that it is the north end of the west side is proven wrong here.....
Spires Demystified

the funny part is that you keep saying (and lying) that we cant show pictures of the steel core on 9/11. well, the world famous "spire" is the center two rows of the steel core!!

 

[Christophera]

wrong, you lying sack of shit. the spire was the two center rows of the steel core. your claim (the one that you simply fabricated, apparently) that it is the north end of the west side is proven wrong here.....
Spires Demystified

The assertion that this is the north end of the west wall is certain by very simple means, unlike that falacious page you link to that is created by an electrical engineer that couldn't tell the difference between unraveled flexible electrical conduit and det cord on scholars for 9-11 truth.

This image is taken north of WTC 1's west wall and shows the spire to the right of a massive object NOT a steel core column. It appears with a fractured end. Obviously and end view of a very thick concrete wall. The center area of the core left of the concrete wall is empty.

The below shows a totally empty core with rebar surrounding it.

This is the spire from the west. Clearly it is the north end of the wall and the core behind it is empty.

This is a superimposition that locates the spire as the noth end of the west inner wall of the exterior steel structure.

 

[Fizz]

The assertion that this is the north end of the west wall is certain by very simple means, unlike that falacious page you link to that is created by an electrical engineer that couldn't tell the difference between unraveled flexible electrical conduit and det cord on scholars for 9-11 truth.

This image is taken north of WTC 1's west wall and shows the spire to the right of a massive object NOT a steel core column. It appears with a fractured end. Obviously and end view of a very thick concrete wall.

proof please. where is your proof that it is a very thick concrete wall? it looks exactly like the rest of the debris cloud you see everywhere and doesnt look like a solid object at all.

 

[DiveCon]

The assertion that this is the north end of the west wall is certain by very simple means, unlike that falacious page you link to that is created by an electrical engineer that couldn't tell the difference between unraveled flexible electrical conduit and det cord on scholars for 9-11 truth.

This image is taken north of WTC 1's west wall and shows the spire to the right of a massive object NOT a steel core column. It appears with a fractured end. Obviously and end view of a very thick concrete wall.

proof please. where is your proof that it is a very thick concrete wall? it looks exactly like the rest of the debris cloud you see everywhere and doesnt look like a solid object at all.

hey, the dipshit is still using 2 photos of the exact same thing and calling them different things
his delusions are too far gone for him to ever see the truth

 

[Fizz]

chris, you delusional deadbeat jackass, YOU ARE SO BUSTED!!!

you superimposed the towers in the wrong place!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahaaa!!!!

before i go making graphics to prove you wrong do you want to admit you used the wrong angle and put the towers in the wrong place??

 

[Christophera]

chris, you delusional deadbeat jackass, YOU ARE SO BUSTED!!!

you superimposed the towers in the wrong place!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahaaa!!!!

before i go making graphics to prove you wrong do you want to admit you used the wrong angle and put the towers in the wrong place??

I did not create that superimposition. One of my opposition did, and shortly thereafter they became informed with independently verified evidence and STOPPED supporting secret methods of mass murder. They were a sincere American being reasonable and responsible.

BTW, the red arrow indicates the 2 interior box columns that were a part of the moment frame which connected on all 4 faces of the inner wall of the exterior steel framework.

There were no steel core columns in the core area and you cannot post an image of them and have not . . . ever.

 

[DiveCon]

chris, you delusional deadbeat jackass, YOU ARE SO BUSTED!!!

you superimposed the towers in the wrong place!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahaaa!!!!

before i go making graphics to prove you wrong do you want to admit you used the wrong angle and put the towers in the wrong place??

I did not create that superimposition. One of my opposition did, and shortly thereafter they became informed with independently verified evidence and STOPPED supporting secret methods of mass murder. They were a sincere American being reasonable and responsible.

BTW, the red arrow indicates the 2 interior box columns that were a part of the moment frame which connected on all 4 faces of the inner wall of the exterior steel framework.

There were no steel core columns in the core area and you cannot post an image of them and have not . . . ever.

you are such a liar

 

[Fizz]

There were no steel core columns in the core area and you cannot post an image of them and have not . . . ever.

there were only steel columns in two places. the perimeter columns and the core columns. unless you are claiming these are perimeter columns then they are core columns.

where did you get the information that this is the northwest corner of the core? i think you said northwest, but not important. i want to see your evidence before i prove you wrong.

or is this just something else you completely fabricated?

 

[Christophera]

There were no steel core columns in the core area and you cannot post an image of them and have not . . . ever.

there were only steel columns in two places. the perimeter columns and the core columns. unless you are claiming these are perimeter columns then they are core columns.

where did you get the information that this is the northwest corner of the core? i think you said northwest, but not important. i want to see your evidence before i prove you wrong.

or is this just something else you completely fabricated?

The perimeter columns stand in the background, and the columns of the inner framed wall that supported the floors with the perimeter columns is left of a 12 foot thick concrete wall with a 3x7 hallway running the length of it.

The box column is the largest of all and the spire below is one of the same.

 

[DiveCon]

There were no steel core columns in the core area and you cannot post an image of them and have not . . . ever.

there were only steel columns in two places. the perimeter columns and the core columns. unless you are claiming these are perimeter columns then they are core columns.

where did you get the information that this is the northwest corner of the core? i think you said northwest, but not important. i want to see your evidence before i prove you wrong.

or is this just something else you completely fabricated?

The perimeter columns stand in the background, and the columns of the inner framed wall that supported the floors with the perimeter columns is left of a 12 foot thick concrete wall with a 3x7 hallway running the length of it.

The box column is the largest of all and the spire below is one of the same.

all steel and no concrete
you even post the proof, but you are so fucking delusional you think it was concrete