Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

Clearly, your text STATING that the evidence of the concrete core should somehow be diminished, is strictly inadequate compared tp the actual array of corroborating and consistent facts there are.

are you fucking serious? diminish evidence of a concrete core?

WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE!!!!??

you lie and say the architect said something he did not. thats just about all we need to know about you, your credibility and how your really dont give a shit about facts. all facts prove the core was steel.

you got nothing. :cuckoo:
 
fiz said:
are you fucking serious? diminish evidence of a concrete core?

WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE!!!!??

You cannot link to a site having images of the steel core columns in the core area.

You cannot link to a site having information about the core that DOES NOT originate with FEMA.

This is all independent from FEMA about the true core, the concrete core. It is very consistent compared to the nonsense you find about the other, non existent cores and to contradictions found there.
 
fiz said:
are you fucking serious? diminish evidence of a concrete core?

WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE!!!!??

You cannot link to a site having images of the steel core columns in the core area.

You cannot link to a site having information about the core that DOES NOT originate with FEMA.

This is all independent from FEMA about the true core, the concrete core. It is very consistent compared to the nonsense you find about the other, non existent cores and to contradictions found there.

here is your proof of steel core columns in the steel core area and it has nothing to do with fema.

9790d1269213739-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-wtc-fizz7.jpg
 
If there were a bunch of steel core columns in the core and that is what is holding up what we see, we would see them sticking out the top of the core, at least a few and they would be very RAGGED.

The steel core columns have to show in the core area at some time, or they did not exist. What existed was elevator guide rail support steel
 
If there were a bunch of steel core columns in the core and that is what is holding up what we see, we would see them sticking out the top of the core, at least a few and they would be very RAGGED.

The steel core columns have to show in the core area at some time, or they did not exist. What existed was elevator guide rail support steel
and you did on one of the towers
you post that pic often enough
it just didnt happen to have any on the first tower that collapsed
dipshit
 
dit said:
and you did on one of the towers
you post that pic often enough
it just didnt happen to have any on the first tower that collapsed
dipshit

You always say that and never post the image with what you say so you can lie. The infiltrators of the US government and perpetrators would like that.

The images posted only show columns surrounding the core. You've been unsuccesfully trying to misinterpret this one as a core column. It is not. It is an interior box column, one of 24 that surrounded the concrete core walls.

site1074.jpg


It is NOT inside the core. It is clearly outside the core area which is on the left.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


Here are the interior box columns silhouetted against the concrete core wll behind them.

site1074.jpg
 
southcorestands.gif


Absolutely no structural steel protrudes from the top where the supposed steel core columns were located.

why do you need to be such a lying piece of shit and only show the silhouette of that object? in this view you can clearly see it is made of steel columns.

corecloseupbest.jpg
 
dit said:
and you did on one of the towers
you post that pic often enough
it just didnt happen to have any on the first tower that collapsed
dipshit

You always say that and never post the image with what you say so you can lie. The infiltrators of the US government and perpetrators would like that.

The images posted only show columns surrounding the core. You've been unsuccesfully trying to misinterpret this one as a core column. It is not. It is an interior box column, one of 24 that surrounded the concrete core walls.

site1074.jpg


It is NOT inside the core. It is clearly outside the core area which is on the left.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


Here are the interior box columns silhouetted against the concrete core wll behind them.

site1074.jpg
dipshit, i dont need to post photos(although i HAVE) because YOUR photos prove a steel column core
 
That shot is taken seconds before while the interior box columns still surround the concrete.

Here is the other tower after the walls detonate then mis detonates and falls instead.

core_animation_75.gif
 
That shot is taken seconds before while the interior box columns still surround the concrete.

Here is the other tower after the walls detonate then mis detonates and falls instead.

core_animation_75.gif

where is your proof that interior box columns surrounded a concrete core? where are you getting that information from?
 
From the missing 2 hour PBS documentary, which is why PBS is named IN RE to disclosure of treason.

A Ph.D who searched for it, and I know he found signs because his information about the title corrected mine. Here is a .mp3 where he talks about it while I co host in 2007.

http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3

Then there is this image that shows the interior box column of the north side WTC 1, left of the 12 foot thick core base wall.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg
 
From the missing 2 hour PBS documentary, which is why PBS is named IN RE to disclosure of treason.

A Ph.D who searched for it, and I know he found signs because his information about the title corrected mine. Here is a .mp3 where he talks about it while I co host in 2007.

http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3

Then there is this image that shows the interior box column of the north side WTC 1, left of the 12 foot thick core base wall.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg
except there is no 12' thick concrete wall
 
That shot is taken seconds before while the interior box columns still surround the concrete.

Here is the other tower after the walls detonate then mis detonates and falls instead.

core_animation_75.gif

Surrounding the STEEL core, we KNOW for a FACT that they installed drywall.

In that animated image you love to post and re-post in which you INSIST that we "see" a concrete wall falling (and you cannot establish that it's even a wall as opposed to a collapsed section of flooring which WAS made out of concrete), how do YOU establish that the falling section is concrete and not an area of drywall?
 
From the missing 2 hour PBS documentary, which is why PBS is named IN RE to disclosure of treason.

so you dont have any proof at all. all we have is your word of what you recall a documentary to say. and your word is frankly SHIT. you didnt pay your child support for at least a dozen years and owe $30,000. you have continually changed your story time and time again about what was in the documentary. even if there is a missing documentary where is your proof that it says what you claim it does? :cuckoo:

yet we have documentaries dating back to the 70s that clearly show a steel core. these arent missing. they are on youtube.
 
libalot said:
Surrounding the STEEL core, we KNOW for a FACT that they installed drywall.

In that animated image you love to post and re-post in which you INSIST that we "see" a concrete wall falling (and you cannot establish that it's even a wall as opposed to a collapsed section of flooring which WAS made out of concrete), how do YOU establish that the falling section is concrete and not an area of drywall?

It is too thick.

It falls too rapidly without catching air.

The drywall was between elevator guide rail support steel and we don't see any of them.

Since the core is empty in all 9-11 images, the steel core columns did not exist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top