Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Makes sense because his own cabinet member said so and what every school child knows- Iraq had zero, ZERO, 0 to do w/ 9/11. They changed their reasons for invading when the American people weren't buying what they were selling so Bush came out w/ "yabut 9/11 !!!"
Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
Which was it? Stockpiles? Active weapons program?So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
His rationale was an active weapons program. Not munitions that had been dumped decades ago.
Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
d
they've been doing it since 2003, shame on them given the unnecessary casualties, and only started saying they were lying as well after the last election. Republicans = domestic North KoreansStill, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
Which was it? Stockpiles? Active weapons program?So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
His rationale was an active weapons program. Not munitions that had been dumped decades ago.
Both were found.
Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
d
Their age is not irrelevant as that was what bush and buddies claimed. Nice try at revising history. Did I accidentally insult your God bush?
A stockpile is a stockpile. Age IS irrelevant when it comes to bicomponent nerve agent munitions, at least as far as killing power is concerned.Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
d
Their age is not irrelevant as that was what bush and buddies claimed. Nice try at revising history. Did I accidentally insult your God bush?
So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
Ivading Iraq was a mistake.
That's the consensus now even among Republicans, whose presidential candidates in recent days have largely fallen in line behind Jeb Bush and denounced the 2003 invasion initiated by his brother. After first telling Fox News this month he "would have" invaded Iraq, Bush subtly changed his answer three days later, saying in a subsequent interview he would not but couching the reversal in a qualifier that blamed the decision-making on a failure of accurate intelligence.
A stockpile is a stockpile. Age IS irrelevant when it comes to bicomponent nerve agent munitions, at least as far as killing power is concerned.Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
d
Their age is not irrelevant as that was what bush and buddies claimed. Nice try at revising history. Did I accidentally insult your God bush?
So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
Trollin', trollin' trollin'....
Sure it was, for those of us who know a bit about chemistry. Saddam simply transferred the precursor business from his defense department to chemical industry. The Iraqi chemical industry was in active production of nerve agent precursors up until invasion.Which was it? Stockpiles? Active weapons program?So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
His rationale was an active weapons program. Not munitions that had been dumped decades ago.
Both were found.
No. An active weapons program was never found.
But, there were stockpiles.A stockpile is a stockpile. Age IS irrelevant when it comes to bicomponent nerve agent munitions, at least as far as killing power is concerned.Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Still, WMDs were found in Iraq.
Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
d
Their age is not irrelevant as that was what bush and buddies claimed. Nice try at revising history. Did I accidentally insult your God bush?
Again try justify bushes lying all you want no intelligent person buys your bullshit lies. Bush said there were new stockpiles and that was a lie. This isn't a civil lawsuit so quit trying to play semantics on word games.
But, there were stockpiles.A stockpile is a stockpile. Age IS irrelevant when it comes to bicomponent nerve agent munitions, at least as far as killing power is concerned.Thousands of chemical weapons is "stockpiles" in my book, especially considering the toxicity. And, thousands were found. Their age is irrelevant as, those that contained mustard gas were still viable, and the bicomponents last for decades and decades.Not the stockpiles like Collin Powell said there would be. Those wmds found were decades old and not new by any means as the bush administration had said. It is funny watching revisionists try and support Ws blunders.
d
Their age is not irrelevant as that was what bush and buddies claimed. Nice try at revising history. Did I accidentally insult your God bush?
Again try justify bushes lying all you want no intelligent person buys your bullshit lies. Bush said there were new stockpiles and that was a lie. This isn't a civil lawsuit so quit trying to play semantics on word games.
Would you like a few links to that?
I'll be happy to provide them. Our DoD just took a few years to release the info.
Which was it? Stockpiles? Active weapons program?So, if you say GWB's rationale for invasion of Iraq was WMDs, how is it he lied?
His rationale was an active weapons program. Not munitions that had been dumped decades ago.
Both were found.
No. An active weapons program was never found.
