TRump desegregated Palm Beach, that is why racist democrats hate him

That's exactly why there's pushback against Trump, it's his pioneering work to eradicate racism in america. We're equally sure that's why you're drawn to him.
So you and the retarded left don't want to eradicate racism in America? Thanks for clarifying that you are a racist. Retard.


Democrats are the racists in this country....everything to them is race....they are obsessed with it...

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.........................
Take a nap retarded lib

Great discussion, "the 'other' side sucks". It's working wonderfully for society.

Eliminationism. It's all their tiny minds can grasp.

One must presume it's in pursuit of a glorious one-party State where the running dog lackeys will be imprisoned by the State for the greater good. Ein Partei über alles.
 
Donald Trump- sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent to blacks and Puerto Ricans.

Donald Trump’s racial discrimination problem

In 1975, Trump ultimately came to a far-reaching agreement with the DOJ in which he and the company did not admit guilt but agreed not to discriminate and to take steps to open its housing stock to more nonwhites. The company agreed to submit a weekly list of vacancies to the Urban League, which would produce qualified applicants for a portion of all vacancies.


But it didn’t end there. In 1978, the government filed a motion for supplemental relief, charging that the Trump company had not complied with the 1975 agreement. The government alleged that the Trump company “discriminated against blacks in the terms and conditions of rental, made statements indicating discrimination based on race and told blacks that apartments were not available for inspection and rental when, in fact, they are,” the Times reported. Trump again denied the charges.

And, in 2000 Trump ran for President in the Reform party for a few months before he withdrew. He did have time to publish his choices for five positions in his administration. He chose Oprah Winfrey as VP, Colin Powell as Sec of State, Charlie Rangel as Sec of HUD and two other white guys.
Does that sound like a racist to you?


Trump is not a racist.....the racist democrat party ..

I don't think that Trump is racist- but then again neither is the Democratic party.

As long as bitter old white right wing nut jobs like yourself dominate the GOP- and complain its the minorities that are racists- minorities will continue to view you as the party of racists.
 
Donald Trump- sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent to blacks and Puerto Ricans.

Donald Trump’s racial discrimination problem

In 1975, Trump ultimately came to a far-reaching agreement with the DOJ in which he and the company did not admit guilt but agreed not to discriminate and to take steps to open its housing stock to more nonwhites. The company agreed to submit a weekly list of vacancies to the Urban League, which would produce qualified applicants for a portion of all vacancies.


But it didn’t end there. In 1978, the government filed a motion for supplemental relief, charging that the Trump company had not complied with the 1975 agreement. The government alleged that the Trump company “discriminated against blacks in the terms and conditions of rental, made statements indicating discrimination based on race and told blacks that apartments were not available for inspection and rental when, in fact, they are,” the Times reported. Trump again denied the charges.

And, in 2000 Trump ran for President in the Reform party for a few months before he withdrew. He did have time to publish his choices for five positions in his administration. He chose Oprah Winfrey as VP, Colin Powell as Sec of State, Charlie Rangel as Sec of HUD and two other white guys.
Does that sound like a racist to you?

The Democratic Party elected the United States first African American President.

Does that sound like a racist party to you?
 
In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.


And more on Berry Goldwater...a real civil rights hero.......

I like Barry Goldwater- but the GOP made a choice in 1964- to pick a candidate who voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act or someone who voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

The GOP chose against- as Martin Luther King Jr. noted:

“While not himself a racist,” concluded Martin Luther King Jr., “Mr. Goldwater articulates a philosophy which gives aid and comfort to the racists.” Jackie Robinson, after attending the GOP convention in 1964, helped launch Republicans for Johnson.


No asswipe......you lied by omission.......you lied about who Berry Goldwater was.....

I was very specific about what Barry Goldwater (and its Barry- not 'Berry') did that alienated the African American community- and resulted in Martin Luther King Jr. condemning the GOP.

You just can't handle the truth.

The GOP nominated for President in 1964- one of the Conservative Senators who voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

And is the fact you really, really don't want anyone paying attention to.

But it was a turning point for the GOP- from when they stopped being more for people like Goldwater- and started being more for people like you.


Yes...they voted against a man who helped found the Arizona NACCP, The Urban league, helped bring food to Native Americans, and desegregated the Arizona National Guard before Truman desegregated the Army, forced the Senate to allow black Americans to eat in the Senate lunch room, voted for all the other Civil Rights acts he was in office to vote on.....

And then voted for a man who voted against a law that would help prevent blacks from being hanged.....

You tell me that isn't fucking stupid shit.....

I just love you telling African Americans that they are just stupid - and that Martin Luther King Jr. was really stupid.

By the way- you 'lied by omission'

LOL
 
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.
If that were true obuthole would have never been elected and Hillary wouldn't have a snowballs chance in hell.

Thank you Exhibit A.
 
Donald Trump- sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent to blacks and Puerto Ricans.

Donald Trump’s racial discrimination problem

In 1975, Trump ultimately came to a far-reaching agreement with the DOJ in which he and the company did not admit guilt but agreed not to discriminate and to take steps to open its housing stock to more nonwhites. The company agreed to submit a weekly list of vacancies to the Urban League, which would produce qualified applicants for a portion of all vacancies.


But it didn’t end there. In 1978, the government filed a motion for supplemental relief, charging that the Trump company had not complied with the 1975 agreement. The government alleged that the Trump company “discriminated against blacks in the terms and conditions of rental, made statements indicating discrimination based on race and told blacks that apartments were not available for inspection and rental when, in fact, they are,” the Times reported. Trump again denied the charges.

And, in 2000 Trump ran for President in the Reform party for a few months before he withdrew. He did have time to publish his choices for five positions in his administration. He chose Oprah Winfrey as VP, Colin Powell as Sec of State, Charlie Rangel as Sec of HUD and two other white guys.
Does that sound like a racist to you?

The Democratic Party elected the United States first African American President.

Does that sound like a racist party to you?

Did I say it was?
 
Democrats are the racists in this country....everything to them is race....they are obsessed with it...
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.
 
Democrats are the racists in this country....everything to them is race....they are obsessed with it...
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, and you showed you have no idea about Barry Goldwater and why he voted that way. What it did do was expose you for the feces for brains libbie that you are. The racists are still in your party and you can't even admit it or are too ignorant to know. Even the Westboro Baptist Church is in your party. The mentally ill know no bounds.
 
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, .

 
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, and you showed you have no idea about Barry Goldwater and why he voted that way. What it did do was expose you for the feces for brains libbie that you are. The racists are still in your party and you can't even admit it or are too ignorant to know. Even the Westboro Baptist Church is in your party. The mentally ill know no bounds.

Churches don't have "political parties", idiot.
 
Yep....Trump forced Palm Beach to end racial and religious segregation.....one of the reasons why racist democrats hate him....

Remember When Trump Got Palm Beach’s Country Clubs To Desegregate? Neither Does The Media

:lol:

No, he didn't "get Palm Beach's clubs to desegregate". He bought a private estate and made it a club.
That's singular -- a club. As in "one".
Snopes

You'll also notice that when your own article mentions restrictions the city put on Rump's club (which is true) ------- none of them made reference to race or religion.

Your own link.

You'll further also notice that your own link also recounts how Rump retracted his charge that he was being discriminated against because of his non-discrimination.

Again -- your own link.


Palm beach golfing had been "segregated" in such private estates -- between Jews and Gentiles --- for decades.

>> Every now and then I get to catch up on the news from Palm Beach, and I find out that, for some things, “plus de change, plus la meme chose” (more change, more of the same thing.) One of those concerns Palm Beach’s private clubs. The fact that they’re exclusive isn’t surprising; that’s the nature of the place. And, since we are on U.S. soil, the freedom of association (under attack by our courts, but still there) make it possible for private clubs to admit whom they want and to exclude whom they don’t. But there’s one rather insidious practice that hasn’t changed even with all of the other social changes we have experienced here in the U.S., one that has survived the coming and going of many of us.

Anyone who lived on the north end of the island had to pass the Palm Beach Country Club, with its well manicured course and pristine clubhouse, to go anywhere. As we passed this place time and time again, I (a kid of nine or ten) wondered, “Why do we pass this place up to go to another club?” I grew up in a family where it wasn’t wise to ask too many questions, but eventually I was told that it was the “Jewish Country Club,” and since we were Gentiles, we belonged elsewhere. (That “elsewhere” was the Breakers.)

This segregation was strictly enforced. There were “Jewish clubs,” there were “Gentile clubs,” and n’er the twain met. This enforcement could be brutal. In the early 1960’s a member of another of Palm Beach’s exclusive clubs (the Everglades Club) made the mistake of bringing her Jewish friend for lunch. She was asked to resign her membership. << -- Join the Club --- Maybe Not
You'll notice the author epilogues at the end of this piece --- written in 2005, twenty years after Rump's golfing escapades --- thusly:

>> But even today the clubs of Palm Beach–and many elsewhere in South Florida and beyond–are still divided between Jew and Gentile. Some clubs in other places have opened up on this matter. But dear old Palm Beach is “sticking with tradition” on this one.<<​

So no, the premise of this thread is bullshit. Or more directly we should say no, the media/history doesn't "remember" when that happened because ---- it didn't.
a
Your point?
Palm Beach was once known as a lily white country club enclave for liberal thinking wealthy old money Caucasians. The kind of people who's liberalism extends only to the times when they are in the public eye. Behind the scenes, they segregate themselves away from the very people they claim to embrace.
They are sure to let everyone know they donate to left wing political causes and candidates. They are the classic "do as I say, not as I do' libs.
What a bunch of hock tooey!!!
Is Trump even considered "Old Money"? He's not a Rockefeller, or Mellon or Vanderbilt or Morgan or Carnegie?

I don't get it? so Trump sued Palm Beach because their laws restricted him from having more than 500 memberships to his Golf Club and Trump wanted to get richer and have MORE than the 500 memberships, regardless of the surrounding home owner's concerns over making their neighborhood much more crowded with commercial business customers, and you call this Trump forcing desegregation on Palm Beach Country Clubs? HUH????????????

Two Words- Tiger Woods-1997 winner of the Masters....
 
In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, .



Yes.....Martin Luther King chose to support the man who voted against anti lynching laws.....laws meant to protect blacks from being hanged by democrats, over Berry Goldwater...a man who flew planes to bring food to native Americans, desegregated his department stores, desegregated the National Guard 2 years before Truman desegregated the Army, voted for all the civil rights acts except the big government 1964 act, forced the Senate Cafeteria to serve blacks......

He supported the man who voted against protecting blacks from democrats who were hanging them.....

And you think that was the smart choice.....you really are fucking stupid.
 
So you and the retarded left don't want to eradicate racism in America? Thanks for clarifying that you are a racist. Retard.


Democrats are the racists in this country....everything to them is race....they are obsessed with it...
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

You and the democrats have to lie.....to hide the actual racism of the democrat party......

The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority | RedState

Goldwater had supported the 1957 and 1960 acts but believed that Title II and Title VII of the 1964 bill were unconstitutional, based in part on a 75-page brief from Robert Bork.

But far from extending a welcoming hand to southern segregationists, he named as his running mate a New York representative, William E. Miller, who had been the co-author of Republican civil-rights legislation in the 1950s.

The Republican platform in 1964 was hardly catnip for Klansmen: It spoke of the Johnson administration’s failure to help further the “just aspirations of the minority groups” and blasted the president for his refusal “to apply Republican-initiated retraining programs where most needed, particularly where they could afford new economic opportunities to Negro citizens.”

Other planks in the platform included: “improvements of civil rights statutes adequate to changing needs of our times; such additional administrative or legislative actions as may be required to end the denial, for whatever unlawful reason, of the right to vote; continued opposition to discrimination based on race, creed, national origin or sex.”

And Goldwater’s fellow Republicans ran on a 1964 platform demanding “full implementation and faithful execution of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and all other civil rights statutes, to assure equal rights and opportunities guaranteed by the Constitution to every citizen.” Some dog whistle.

The democrats fought every other Civil Rights act before 64.....using bombs, hanging and other forms of murder to intimidate blacks........and when LBJ realized it was no longer going to work, and that they actually needed black votes to keep power, they changed their tactics and decided to buy votes with welfare benefits....

:rofl: History revisionism must be fun. I dunno, unfortunately I was born with a brain.

LBJ spearheaded the CRA, after JFK initiated it. He was also the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant. No doubt party because he remembered hunkering down as a boy inside the house while his father and uncles stayed up with shotguns to face them down.

But DO go on with Creative Writing Class..... :popcorn:

I think my favorite part is when the historical events can't fit a square peg into a round hole they go "uh, but then they changed their minds and did the opposite so they're still boogeymen!" :lmao:


LBJ said he would have every n****r voting democrat for the next 200 years with his Great Society....and voted against anti lynching laws....laws meant to protect blacks from the democrats who were hanging them......moron.
 
In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, .



This is the man King supported over Berry Goldwater...

Lyndon Johnson opposed every civil rights proposal considered in his first 20 years as lawmaker

The introduction to the book says that as Johnson became president in 1963, some civil rights leaders were not convinced of Johnson’s good faith, due to his voting record. "He had been a congressman, beginning in 1937,

for eleven years, and for eleven years he had voted against every civil rights bill – against not only legislation aimed at ending the poll tax and segregation in the armed services but even against legislation aimed at ending lynching: a one hundred percent record," Caro wrote.

"Running for the Senate in 1948, he had assailed President" Harry "Truman’s entire civil rights program (‘an effort to set up a police state’)…Until 1957, in the Senate, as in the House, his record – by that time a twenty-year record – against civil rights had been consistent," Caro wrote.

We found that excerpt in the book as well as these vignettes:

--In 1947, after President Harry S Truman sent Congress proposals against lynching and segregation in interstate transportation, Johnson called the proposed civil rights program a "farce and a sham--an effort to set up a police state in the guise of liberty."

--In his 1948 speech in Austin kicking off his Senate campaign, Johnson declared he was against Truman’s attempt to end the poll tax because, Johnson said, "it is the province of the state to run its own elections." Johnson also was against proposals against lynching "because the federal government," Johnson said, "has no more business enacting a law against one form of murder than against another."

Next, we asked an expert in the offices of the U.S. Senate to check on Johnson’s votes on civil rights measures as a lawmaker. By email, Betty Koed, an associate historian for the Senate, said that according to information compiled by the Senate Library, in "the rare cases when" such "bills came to a roll call vote, it appears that" Johnson "consistently voted against" them or voted to stop consideration. (See detail in her email, here.)

King supported a man who only supported Civil Rights when the real fight for Civil Rights was won.....and he knew that without scamming the black vote, democrats would lose elections......and King didn't support a real supporter of Civil Rights........
 
In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, .


We already know this and Dr. King doesn't use the R-word unless to mean Republican. History shows that the GOP were the ones who were instrumental in passing the Civil Rights bill and also the Voting Rights Act in 1965. This was against the real racists. How do I know? Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican.

Next, the question was why did Barry Goldwater vote against the civil right movement?* To which, one MI Fenton Lam, opens his brain-deficient, ignorant piehole and cries, "Racism!" like the MI lemmings in the Democratic Party. It's something that was drilled into them. It's okay to scream the R-word when it's not exposing the truth of the Democratic Party. Decades of misdirection. BTW James Earl Ray, the assassin, was a Democrat.

Facts are stubborn things.

* Barry Goldwater would be today's Libertarian. Sen. Barry Goldwater, did vote against the Civil Rights Act, despite having a solid civil rights record up to that point. He was against it over constitutional grounds that it should be a local decision and not federal.

In a case of the past coming back to haunt you, it turns out that one Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater girl ha ha.

goldhead.jpg
 
The Democrats have specialized in racial baiting and bigotry since they defended slavery in the early 1800s then established the KKK and Jim Crow later

In 1964 the Republicans nominated for President one of the few Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That was the year everything shifted in the Republican Party. Democrats proposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Johnson pushed it through- but it could not have passed without active Republican support because Conservatives- Democrat and Republican- opposed it.

One of those Conservatives was Barry Goldwater.

The GOP chose him to be their 1964 Presidential candidate.

And the GOP Party changed forever.

Oh believe me, this version of the Republican Party could never handle Goldwater.

You prolly know better than not that political I, but would think today Goldwater wouldn't run with the GOP, but the LP. Regardless, both parties' enemy is Hillary Clinton. However, the LP wouldn't vote for the GOP based on that.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but you're pretty confused about one thing. The enemy of "both" parties who serve the power structure is a clear, coherent, critically thinking public who knows better than to buy into the partisanshit.

I was trying to find out what you knew about Barry Goldwater, and you showed you have no idea about Barry Goldwater and why he voted that way. What it did do was expose you for the feces for brains libbie that you are. The racists are still in your party and you can't even admit it or are too ignorant to know. Even the Westboro Baptist Church is in your party. The mentally ill know no bounds.

a) I don't have a party, pay attention
b) I didn't say anything about how Goldwater voted
c) Goldwater vociferously warned against allowing the religiosos to take over the Republican Party, which they have
d) Racism is an AMERICAN societal problem that has all of us woven into its fabric, thus no on is totally immune, while the incessant finger pointing allows sweet denial
e) I still have no idea what you're blathering on about
 
I'm sorry, but this whole my-party-is-less-racist-than-your-party bullshit is meaningless distraction, just as your power structure relies upon to keep the masses docile.
 

Forum List

Back
Top