Trump impeachment urged by WSJ editorial board member

S&P 500
November 5, 2024, 5,782
April 11, 2025 5,363
:rolleyes-41:


Cherry put your money in a savings account. You don't the to stomach for the market volatility.
The reason for the drop starting in January was because of the Fed reserve not cutting the rate.

Now go pound sand, dear.
I do not take financial advice from chawbacon's such as yourself... :rolleyes-41:
 
If you did this without the votes to convict he will simply double down on the stupidity.
 
Removing Trump via impeachment would actually be smart politics.

Republicans would still control the WH – which is all they care about.

The Cult would still be in control, continue implementing P25 – Vance wouldn’t interfere with that.

Vance could run in 2028 as an incumbent or be replaced during the primaries – which Republicans would need to do anyway if Trump were still in office; Vance could also serve for two terms.

And getting rid of the increasingly unpopular, increasingly unstable Trump could benefit Republicans in the mid-terms.

But Republicans aren’t smart.
 
Even with the wild ride last week,
The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.6%, a gain of more than 600 points, while the S&P 500 added 1.8% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite jumped 2.1%

They` remain in correction territory. Which is where they’ll be, along with the rest of the markets for at least 90 days.

Please don’t be foolish enough to believe that Trump and his lickspittle staff is going to negotiate 37 separate trade deals in 90 days.
 
What successes? Crashing the stock market? Ruining our status as leader in the world? Picking fights with our allies?
Putting the country on the road to recession? :)

Ok, well, I guess your idea of success is somewhat different from mine. :auiqs.jpg:
It's only been a few weeks. It takes time.
 
No, but if he defies the Supreme Court and refuses it’s command to bring the man he snatched off the street and pa ked off to El Salvador back, that WILL BE an I,peaceable offense.

As for Holman Jenkins, he has always skirted the edge of the right wing lunatic fringe.

You apparently have no idea what CO EQUAL branches of gov't mean. The SCOTUS has NO power to tell the president what to do with regards to foreign affairs. That's why it didn't COMMAND him to do anything, as he could tell them to kiss his ass.

The job of SCOTUS is to INTERPRET LAW. Not to meddle in the chief executives foreign affairs.
 
They` remain in correction territory. Which is where they’ll be, along with the rest of the markets for at least 90 days.

Please don’t be foolish enough to believe that Trump and his lickspittle staff is going to negotiate 37 separate trade deals in 90 days.
Typical democrat speculation. Hide and watch.
 
The Supreme Court didn't "order Trump to return" anyone.

The dude's an idiot. He thinks SCOTUS overrules the president.

I'd like to know what the fucking left thinks the president has the power to do. They think SCOTUS can overrule the president. They think district judges can overrule the president.

What do they think POTUS is, a janitor?
 
Deranged democrats see the writing on the wall. They know that they are about to be swamped into irrelevancy in 2026 so they feel they have to do something now.
 
'In a column published late Friday, a member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board claimed it would be "desirable" to subject Donald Trump to a third impeachment to make up for the damage he has done to the U.S. economy with his "ill-founded" trade war.

According to longtime columnist Holman W. Jenkins Jr., Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats almost makes it appear he wants to be impeached, with Jenkins writing, "A future Trump impeachment seemed all but guaranteed by last Wednesday morning. It seems only slightly less likely now. It may even be desirable to restore America’s standing with creditors and trade partners."
[…]
"No consensus or even significant coalition exists for trying to force into existence a new American 'golden age' with tariffs, which anyway is like asking a chicken to give birth to a lioness. He invented this mission out of his own confused intuition," he accused.

"Nobody in Mr. Trump’s orbit actually shares his belief in the magical efficacy of tariffs because it makes sense only in a world that doesn’t exist, where other countries don’t retaliate," he pointed out before concluding, "The founders never anticipated today’s instantly responsive trillion-dollar financial markets. And yet these markets neatly adumbrate the founders’ scheme of checks and balances, also known as feedback. Mr. Trump, still sane enough to appreciate what’s good for Mr. Trump, listened this week to their feedback."'


Impeachment would also be warranted given Trump’s numerous illegal EOs, his ignoring of the courts, his policies that clearly violate the Constitution, and the fact that Trump is unfit to be president – misdemeanors refer to bad acts and poor conduct by a president, a president who is indeed incompetent, such as Trump.

Also the the head shaman of the council of Satan's penis insists that Trump being impeached. I mean these are important people we're talking about here!
 
No, but if he defies the Supreme Court and refuses it’s command to bring the man he snatched off the street and pa ked off to El Salvador back, that WILL BE an I,peaceable offense.

As for Holman Jenkins, he has always skirted the edge of the right wing lunatic fringe.
I think your party should try and impeach Trump first not bringing an illegal alien that was deported back
 
Back
Top Bottom