Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.. You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??Trump shouldn't have to pay taxes. He graces us with his twitters and speaches and rants. That should be enough.
Yes. Nobody is disputing that.
Did you ever have a year or number of years where you paid no federal income taxes?
Yes I did, especially when I was trading commodities. If you take some big losses, you write-off what you legally can that year, and carry the rest over to the following years.
Exactly my point. He claimed a tax loss, which you keep saying makes him a bad business man. You think a tax loss means he had an operating loss, you're talking out of your assThese are tax loses, not operating losses. Ask your accountant about the difference since apparently you don't know. But you can't conclude that tax losses = operating losses
You are talking out of your ass. Trump claimed a Net Operating Loss. Go learn something.
He claimed a net operating loss.
Where did it say he was referring to GAAP and not taxes? You don't know the difference, do you?
Ooooh! GAAP! You are so cool! I never said he was referring to "Generally Accepted Accounting Principles". I said he claimed a net operating loss.....or.......NOL. You clown.
Read The fucking NYT article. It will explain what he claimed. He claimed a net operating loss.
Is that right? Well.....isn't that awesome! Those are capital losses....I believe you are limited in amount. Not the same thing as what Donald did.
Nope. Trump is a blowhard progressive, but head and shoulders better than the criminal in the pant suit.Why post shit from a hard left wing source?
You're right.
He had an awesome political week.
His best ever.
Is that right? Well.....isn't that awesome! Those are capital losses....I believe you are limited in amount. Not the same thing as what Donald did.
So what did Donald do that I didn't do? He carried over losses according to the NYT who didn't pay taxes either in 2014. In fact they got a tax return on top of the profit they made that year.
According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.. You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??Trump shouldn't have to pay taxes. He graces us with his twitters and speaches and rants. That should be enough.
Bo, these were personal tax returns @ 34+%, not Foundation or Initiative audits. I cannot dispute your claim about travel and free services paid from the Foundation because I don't know. Where do you get your data for this claim? I have seen that the Foundation has an 8% admin expense and 92% initiative funding (pie chart), but I don't recall my source. However if it is important to you, I will find it again. If you choose not to believe it, it would be a waste for both of us.According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.. You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??Trump shouldn't have to pay taxes. He graces us with his twitters and speaches and rants. That should be enough.
Add the value of all the travel and free services paid for by Clinton Foundation (tax free) donations, and the taxes paid by the Clintons are an itsy bitsy teeny weeny fraction of the total.
Did the owner/owners of the NYT pay no taxes on their personal returns? Why is this so hard?
Donald didn't claim investment losses.....he claimed a net operating loss.
I'm now exhausted. Did any of you read the NYT piece?
Bo, these were personal tax returns @ 34+%, not Foundation or Initiative audits. I cannot dispute your claim about travel and free services paid from the Foundation because I don't know. Where do you get your data for this claim? I have seen that the Foundation has an 8% admin expense and 92% initiative funding (pie chart), but I don't recall my source. However if it is important to you, I will find it again. If you choose not to believe it, it would be a waste for both of us.According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.. You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??Trump shouldn't have to pay taxes. He graces us with his twitters and speaches and rants. That should be enough.
Add the value of all the travel and free services paid for by Clinton Foundation (tax free) donations, and the taxes paid by the Clintons are an itsy bitsy teeny weeny fraction of the total.
that's not true....the Clintons have not used a dime of their Charity donations for Hillary's campaign or for personal use..... You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??
Beagle, your ignorance is like a perpetual motion machine that just keeps right on giving...
Hillary Clinton's 2015 tax return shows $10.6 million in income, 31% rate -- and puts pressure on Donald Trump
Well, yeah, her bribe income is different than business income.
Speaking of which, I wonder if Trump wrote off the $25,000 bribe that he sent to the guy in Florida, as a business expense....
Political contributions aren't deductible.
Unless you make them to the Clinton Slush Fund, of course.
and it is not true that political donations are NOT deductible...
And this is what Lois Learner was trying to fight...
All of these huge political money pacs are claiming to be charities, and money donations to these PACS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE, as 501 C3;s...
these 501c3's don't have to declare who donated to them either, if memory serves...
As example Karl Rove set up his American Crossroads PAC as a 501c3, which is a charity and they need to spend the majority of their money donations on charity according to the law governing it, but a gazillion political PACS are not doing such and using all of their donations or near all, on political shenanigans....
Would you ever in a million years think Karl Rove's PAC is a charity and anything other than a political PAC....???
Lois Learner was trying to expose this by auditing these evident political groups.....but Republicans went after her to shut her down from exposing the corruption going on in these HUGE Super PACS....allowing these big donors like the Koch brothers, and maybe even Soros if the PAC he donates to is a 501c3 that does not do 50% or more in charity work....to write off their donations for political use, in their taxes as charities.
boe, source? 93% "admin"?Bo, these were personal tax returns @ 34+%, not Foundation or Initiative audits. I cannot dispute your claim about travel and free services paid from the Foundation because I don't know. Where do you get your data for this claim? I have seen that the Foundation has an 8% admin expense and 92% initiative funding (pie chart), but I don't recall my source. However if it is important to you, I will find it again. If you choose not to believe it, it would be a waste for both of us.According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.. You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??Trump shouldn't have to pay taxes. He graces us with his twitters and speaches and rants. That should be enough.
Add the value of all the travel and free services paid for by Clinton Foundation (tax free) donations, and the taxes paid by the Clintons are an itsy bitsy teeny weeny fraction of the total.
boe with an "e", s'il vous plait.
The Clinton Foundation used less than 7% of its funding on charities. The rest went to support the Clintons and their vast political and legal retinue. That's a lot of bank.
boe, source? 93% "admin"?Bo, these were personal tax returns @ 34+%, not Foundation or Initiative audits. I cannot dispute your claim about travel and free services paid from the Foundation because I don't know. Where do you get your data for this claim? I have seen that the Foundation has an 8% admin expense and 92% initiative funding (pie chart), but I don't recall my source. However if it is important to you, I will find it again. If you choose not to believe it, it would be a waste for both of us.According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.. You mean like Hillary and Bill does with all their speeches and bull crap in which has netted them millions ??? Maybe they should check whether she and Bill has turned all that income in to the IRS over the years ??
Add the value of all the travel and free services paid for by Clinton Foundation (tax free) donations, and the taxes paid by the Clintons are an itsy bitsy teeny weeny fraction of the total.
boe with an "e", s'il vous plait.
The Clinton Foundation used less than 7% of its funding on charities. The rest went to support the Clintons and their vast political and legal retinue. That's a lot of bank.
boe, source? 93% "admin"?Bo, these were personal tax returns @ 34+%, not Foundation or Initiative audits. I cannot dispute your claim about travel and free services paid from the Foundation because I don't know. Where do you get your data for this claim? I have seen that the Foundation has an 8% admin expense and 92% initiative funding (pie chart), but I don't recall my source. However if it is important to you, I will find it again. If you choose not to believe it, it would be a waste for both of us.According to a chart I saw this AM, the Clinton's paid 34.+ taxes last year. It was the highest percentage because, it is said, they have only earnings, no Cap Gains or other write-off items. The chart showed past and current president and presidential contenders McCain, Romney, Kerry. Kerry's was mostly Cap Gains so his taxes were low/Clinton's high. It also showed charitable giving and I can't remember that, but I think McCain topped that list.
Add the value of all the travel and free services paid for by Clinton Foundation (tax free) donations, and the taxes paid by the Clintons are an itsy bitsy teeny weeny fraction of the total.
boe with an "e", s'il vous plait.
The Clinton Foundation used less than 7% of its funding on charities. The rest went to support the Clintons and their vast political and legal retinue. That's a lot of bank.
Search engines really are your friends, bub.
The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.
The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over — money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.
Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.
But that’s still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission....
Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post
boe, source? 93% "admin"?Bo, these were personal tax returns @ 34+%, not Foundation or Initiative audits. I cannot dispute your claim about travel and free services paid from the Foundation because I don't know. Where do you get your data for this claim? I have seen that the Foundation has an 8% admin expense and 92% initiative funding (pie chart), but I don't recall my source. However if it is important to you, I will find it again. If you choose not to believe it, it would be a waste for both of us.Add the value of all the travel and free services paid for by Clinton Foundation (tax free) donations, and the taxes paid by the Clintons are an itsy bitsy teeny weeny fraction of the total.
boe with an "e", s'il vous plait.
The Clinton Foundation used less than 7% of its funding on charities. The rest went to support the Clintons and their vast political and legal retinue. That's a lot of bank.
Search engines really are your friends, bub.
The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.
The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over — money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.
Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.
But that’s still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission....
Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post
So the charity pays people to do charitable work and that's bad thing?
Goddam you are stupid.
He's a con man.Trump is either a tax cheat or a lousy businessman.
Take your pick.
Yes, I'm dealing with the standard leg-humping that I get from hardcore partisan ideologues on both ends.Why are you pretending that I'm pretending these are his corporate tax returns?I don't like Trump, and I'm voting for Hillary, my binary-thinking friend.Another Trumptard comes out of the closet. Big surprise.
So you're wrong, again.
And it doesn't deflect from your aggressive ignorance, no matter how hard you try.
I'm guessing you're not even embarrassed.
.
Why are you pretending that these are corporate tax returns?
Oh yeah, you're you.
.
I am crossing threads. You compared Trumps losses to Amazon's losses in another thread. You know what you are doing. Lame. Believe me.
NY doesn't understand that businesses sometimes lose money. I wasn't focusing on Trump, I was talking about business.
But people like you choose not to see that obvious fact, which is why you're a waste of time.
.
.
