🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Trump: Paris Attacks ‘Much Different’ If France Had More Guns

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,366
280
Banning guns is like putting up a sign - "Terrorists welcome".

Trump: Paris Attacks 'Much Different' If France Had More Guns

nov 14 2015 Donald Trump, speaking at a rally on Saturday in Beaumont, Texas, suggested that fewer people would have been killed had more civilians been armed.

“When you look at Paris, toughest gun laws in the world, nobody had guns but the bad guys,” he said. “Nobody had guns. And they were just shooting them one by one, and then they broke in and had a big shootout and ultimately killed the terrorists. And I will tell you what — you can say what you want, if they had guns, if our people had guns, if they were allowed to carry, it would have been a much, much different situation.”
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
This is the main reason obozo wants to ban guns. So americans can't fight the invasion of muslims and mexicans.
 
Banning guns is like putting up a sign - "Terrorists welcome".

Trump: Paris Attacks 'Much Different' If France Had More Guns

nov 14 2015 Donald Trump, speaking at a rally on Saturday in Beaumont, Texas, suggested that fewer people would have been killed had more civilians been armed.

“When you look at Paris, toughest gun laws in the world, nobody had guns but the bad guys,” he said. “Nobody had guns. And they were just shooting them one by one, and then they broke in and had a big shootout and ultimately killed the terrorists. And I will tell you what — you can say what you want, if they had guns, if our people had guns, if they were allowed to carry, it would have been a much, much different situation.”
Trump exercising common sense again.
 
An armed populace serves three purposes..

1. It keeps the government from becoming tyrannical because the people have the ability to remove those persons who get out of control.

2. It keeps the public safer. Police are responsive to calls for help and they are always after the fact reactive. the armed populace is capable of fending off an attacker and stopping the crime while protecting their own life or the life of others.

3. It keeps those who would use terrorism at bay. There is only one thing a terrorist fears more than his master, an armed populace that is capable of killing him before he can act.

Number three is what is missing in France.. they do not fear the public stopping them and the fear of unarmed people being unable to defend themselves freezes any response to stop terrorist actions. They have become victims of their own stupidity.

Another colossal failure of socialism and command/control top down government.
 
How many people know where the majority of terrorism acts occur?

They occur in areas of little resistance and inability to respond in kind.. AKA; GUN FREE ZONES
 

Forum List

Back
Top