Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It makes perfect sense. It’s not like he was ever going to get accolades from the right serving in Biden’s DoJ. He’s already demonized by the right as part of the “deep state”.When the felonies get reversed on appeal he proves he's a bum lawyer, down from the #3 job at the DOJ. Stupid.
It makes no sense unless you factor in the "brownie points" he gets from democrats. If Biden wins, he wins.
1. I was being optimistic saying she should just dismiss the illegal prosecutor's case.Yes please. See if she dismisses the case, then that is appealable to the 11th Circuit by the prosecutor as no jury has been empaneled meaning no double jeopardy has attached.
The 11th will reverse the dismissal, remand it back to the lower court with an order to the Chief Judge of the district that Judge Cannon be replaced. So... Yes please, dismiss the case.
WW
We'll see how it plays out on appeal. If his conviction gets reversed that says what his quality of work was.It makes perfect sense. It’s not like he was ever going to get accolades from the right serving in Biden’s DoJ. He’s already demonized by the right as part of the “deep state”.
He argued an excellent case in court. Whether the conservative judges reverse him is immaterial to the quality of his work.
You’re just crafting a narrative. Use your head and think logically.
It doesn’t. The prosecutors job is to prosecute. The judge decide the law.We'll see how it plays out on appeal. If his conviction gets reversed that says what his quality of work was.
I can agree with that. The NY Laws were specifically revised to "get Trump".It doesn’t. The prosecutors job is to prosecute. The judge decide the law.
It’s not going to be reversed on any kind of prosecutorial misconduct. There was none.
It may be reversed because judges have a different interpretation of the law, which isn’t the prosecutor's fault.
Either way, it isn’t unreasonable to think a prosecutor would want the opportunity to prosecute this case. You don’t need some conspiracy about Biden ordering him to do anything.
jonathanturley.org
Not seeing any laws that were changed.I can agree with that. The NY Laws were specifically revised to "get Trump".
The expired misdemeanors were allowed to be resurrected to get Trump without proving another crime.
So in my non-legal opinion the laws and judges will be the basis for reversal, not the prosecutor.
Or as Turley said:
The JudgeBuzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal
Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…
The Charges
The Evidence
The Instructions
A. The position is indeed random. It's been settled long before this. Two orange stained former AGs notwithstanding.All the more reason to say that hack Smith isn't authorized. Nor would that cause her any problems. The position is hardly random but brought forth by two former Attorneys General of the United States.
Throw away the MSM and Dems propaganda.
Here we have four experiences lawyers telling us she's good.
I have spoken with four different top lawyers who were involved in or observed the arguments before Judge Aileen Cannon respecting the unconstitutional appointment of Jack Smith. The [sic] each told me the judge was extremely intelligent, had throughout reviewed the briefs and clearly studied the law and history of the constitutional provision, that her questions of both sides and all parties were probing and sharp. In other words, Judge Cannon, however she rules, is nothing like the fictional figure the media and their cherry-picked lawyers portray and smear. Indeed, if you look at her background, she was an accomplished law student, private attorney, and assistant United States attorney. The issues before her in the so-called document case are, in several instances, matters of first impression resulting from the nature of the case brought against President Trump, in which Smith is cutting through traditionally untouched barriers in his pursuit of Trump. Cannon, unlike Judge Chutkan (an Obama appointee), refuses to rubber-stamp the government's actions. Unfortunately, those who read the Democrat newspapers and watch the Democrat media have no idea of the issues or that the judge is a serious jurist.By the way, the same media and their so-called legal experts celebrated Judge Emmet Sullivan when he turned his courtroom into a clown show in his pursuit of General Flynn. He was not condemned for his antics, his appointment of a friend to stand in for the DOJ, his solicitation of third-party briefs, and all the rest. Of course, acting state judge, Merchan in Manhattan, the most loathsome fool to wear a black robe, was cheered on by the same media and their so-called legal experts, despite being conflicted and corrupt. Cannon is an earnest judge. I hope she winds up ruling the right way on these matters. But the public intimidation effort against her by the diabolical media, like the campaigns against Alito and Thomas and others, it contemptible but par for their course.
Not really, no.She has the LAW on her side.
1. Maybe this is why they said NY made Laws just to prosecute Trump? There may be others in support of the "secret crime that was covered up by the payments to Stormy"?Not seeing any laws that were changed. Your opinion on the durability of the conviction isn’t the point.
You think that the prosecutor needed to be ordered to leave the DoJ to take the case. That’s a pretty wild assumption.
Smith was NOT appointed legally. Really, he wasn't. Taylor Swift has more legal authority...Not really, no.
Jack Smith: Not properly appointed, hence no standing; plus tampered with evidence.
Cannon should have smith and Garland arrested
1. Maybe this is why they said NY made Laws just to prosecute Trump? There may be others in support of the "secret crime that was covered up by the payments to Stormy"?
The bill doesn’t seem like it ever passed and wasn’t necessary to prosecute Trump.1. Maybe this is why they said NY made Laws just to prosecute Trump? There may be others in support of the "secret crime that was covered up by the payments to Stormy"?
2. I think its more probable for democrats in the WH to focus more attention on getting Trump than letting Alvin do his thing unassisted.
150 years of Special Counsels. No problem.Smith was NOT appointed legally. Really, he wasn't. Taylor Swift has more legal authority...
Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues
Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.www.abajournal.com
and that says it all folks !Prosecuting Donald Trump doesn’t seem like a dink job to me. Seems like that’s the opportunity of a lifetime.
Ed Meese says Taylor Swift has more legal authority than Jack Smith.150 years of Special Counsels. No problem.
Look at Trump for crimes SPECIAL COUNSELS are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!
WW
When the felonies get reversed on appeal he proves he's a bum lawyer, down from the #3 job at the DOJ. Stupid.
It makes no sense unless you factor in the "brownie points" he gets from democrats. If Biden wins, he wins.
Ed Meese says Taylor Swift has more legal authority than Jack Smith.
Some court needs to say who is right.
It probably doesn't matter, the case won't go to trial any time soon.
