Trump Slams Rapist, & Sexual Abuser Bill Clinton, Reopens Feud With Hilary

[Faun]

If it was credible, it wouldn't have been thrown out due to lack of merit. If Clinton was so powerful to avoid a conviction, as you incredibly claim, the same judge who dismissed Jones' allegations due to lack of merit; wouldn't have charged Clinton with contempt of court and fined him.

Sure.

Clinton managed to beat the rap somehow on the politically dangerous accusation of Sexual Harassment, while taking the hit on the far less damaging "lying about sex" charge.

Again, too fucking stupid. Since when is a criminal charge "less damaging" than a civil charge?

When the civil charge is Sexual Harassment and the criminal charge is just "lying about sex".

Stop being an ass about this.

More bullshit. Civil charges, at worst, cost money and possible disgrace.

Criminal charges carry those plus possible jail time.

Your failed attempts to alter reality are noted and dismissed.

Good God woman... how many links to this trash do you need to see before you embarrass yourself further protecting such a rancid piece of shit....

Longtime Bill Clinton sex-assault accuser says Hillary 'enabled' him

I'm not a woman and accusations sans evidence are meaningless.

 

[Faun]

If it was credible, it wouldn't have been thrown out due to lack of merit. If Clinton was so powerful to avoid a conviction, as you incredibly claim, the same judge who dismissed Jones' allegations due to lack of merit; wouldn't have charged Clinton with contempt of court and fined him.

Sure.

Clinton managed to beat the rap somehow on the politically dangerous accusation of Sexual Harassment, while taking the hit on the far less damaging "lying about sex" charge.

Again, too fucking stupid. Since when is a criminal charge "less damaging" than a civil charge?

When the civil charge is Sexual Harassment and the criminal charge is just "lying about sex".

Stop being an ass about this.

More bullshit. Civil charges, at worst, cost money and possible disgrace.

Criminal charges carry those plus possible jail time.

Your failed attempts to alter reality are noted and dismissed.

Really? How much jail time did Bill serve?

He served no time.

 

[Correll]

Sure.

Clinton managed to beat the rap somehow on the politically dangerous accusation of Sexual Harassment, while taking the hit on the far less damaging "lying about sex" charge.

Again, too fucking stupid. Since when is a criminal charge "less damaging" than a civil charge?

When the civil charge is Sexual Harassment and the criminal charge is just "lying about sex".

Stop being an ass about this.

More bullshit. Civil charges, at worst, cost money and possible disgrace.

Criminal charges carry those plus possible jail time.

Your failed attempts to alter reality are noted and dismissed.

Really? How much jail time did Bill serve?

He served no time.

Exactly.

The more dangerous charge was that one that could weaken his political power, ie the Harassment one.

 

[Faun]

Why on Earth should an accusation of sexual harassment have destroyed him? There wasn't even any merit to the accusation.

It was a credible accusation,

And back then accusations of sexual harassment, regardless of credibility, destroyed men. Think Witch Hunt.

But Bill was too big to lose, so the Feminists, and the lib Media and the Dems all closed ranks and stone walled like nothing I had ever seen, before or since.

And changed the rules to give Bill a pass.

Riiiight .... it was so credible an accusation, that her accusation was thrown out of court due to lack of merit.

If you are referring to Paula Jones, the court awarded her $850,000.

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

The court awarded Jones bupkis. In fact, the court threw her case out due to lack of merit. In case you're unaware, courts do not award damages to the losing party. In reality, it was Clinton who offered her that settlement, which came with the agreement that it was not an admission of guilt but just a fuck off payoff after she filed an appeal after her case was thrown out. She took the money and ran. Paid off her lawyers and taxes and had a few bucks left to get a nose job.

Now ya know.

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

 

[Faun]

America needs a man who can get the job done!

You do know that happened under a Republican majority, right ?

True, but Clinton gets the credit since the budget deficits began falling before Republicans took over the Congress and began rising after Clinton left office. Clearly, the GOP couldn't balnce the budget without Clinton's leadership.

Clinton was dragged kicking and screaming to a balance budget.

More revisionist history. Just like your claim that a Cort awarded Jones $850,000.

In reality, it was Republicans who refused to sign Clinton's first budget, which passed anyway since Democrats still controlled the Congress. During his first two years in office, Clinton lowered the deficit by 36% to 163b, before Republicans passed their first budget. That was lower than all 4 years of Bush and 3 of Reagan's years. When factoring in inflation with real figures, Clinton lowered the deficit before Republicans passed their first budget to a level lower than all 12 Reagan/Bush years.

That trend continued after Republicans took over Congress.

That trend ended when Clinton left office and while Republicans still controlled Congress. Then it ballooned out of control. So no, Republicans couldn't balance shit without Clinton's leadership.

What leadership?

"Recall that it was the Clinton White House that fought Republicans every inch of the way in balancing the budget in 1995. When Republicans proposed their own balanced-budget plan, the White House waged a shameless Mediscare campaign to torpedo the plan — a campaign that the Washington Post slammed as “pure demagoguery.” It was Bill Clinton who, during the big budget fight in 1995, had to submit not one, not two, but five budgets until he begrudgingly matched the GOP’s balanced-budget plan. In fact, during the height of the budget wars in the summer of 1995, the Clinton administration admitted that “balancing the budget is not one of our top priorities.”

And lest we forget, it was Bill Clinton and his wife who tried to engineer a federal takeover of the health care system — a plan that would have sent the government’s finances into the stratosphere. Tom Delay was right: for Clinton to take credit for the balanced budget is like Chicago Cubs pitcher Steve Trachsel taking credit for delivering the pitch to Mark McGuire that he hit out of the park for his 62nd home run."

You're still ignoring reality. I can't help you there. The deficit dropped in big numbers in Clinton's first two years before Republicans took over Congress. That trend continued after they did and until Clinton left office. If that was due to Republicans, they would have been able to continue that trend going even after Clinton was no longer president. They couldn't because it was thanks to Clinton.

Who knows why you bring up HillaryCare? That happened before Republicans took over Congress, went nowhere, and had no effect on the budget. Seems at this point, you're just desperately throwing out shit hoping something will work.

 

[Camp]

It was a credible accusation,

And back then accusations of sexual harassment, regardless of credibility, destroyed men. Think Witch Hunt.

But Bill was too big to lose, so the Feminists, and the lib Media and the Dems all closed ranks and stone walled like nothing I had ever seen, before or since.

And changed the rules to give Bill a pass.

Riiiight .... it was so credible an accusation, that her accusation was thrown out of court due to lack of merit.

If you are referring to Paula Jones, the court awarded her $850,000.

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

The court awarded Jones bupkis. In fact, the court threw her case out due to lack of merit. In case you're unaware, courts do not award damages to the losing party. In reality, it was Clinton who offered her that settlement, which came with the agreement that it was not an admission of guilt but just a fuck off payoff after she filed an appeal after her case was thrown out. She took the money and ran. Paid off her lawyers and taxes and had a few bucks left to get a nose job.

Now ya know.

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

Her lawyers got almost the entire settlement which was paid by Bill's insurance.

 

[Camp]

Why is Bill Clinton's difficulties from twenty years ago an issue for Hillary Clinton's campaign for President? It was a private matter between a husband and wife. She handled it the way she thought was best for her and her family. Bill and Hillary have been married to each other for decades. In that time, Trump has admitted and publicly been a multiple adulterer and had three wives. He is in no position to be giving lectures about marriage.

 

[Correll]

Why is Bill Clinton's difficulties from twenty years ago an issue for Hillary Clinton's campaign for President? It was a private matter between a husband and wife. She handled it the way she thought was best for her and her family. Bill and Hillary have been married to each other for decades. In that time, Trump has admitted and publicly been a multiple adulterer and had three wives. He is in no position to be giving lectures about marriage.

And the way she handled it says a lot about the type of person she is.

IE an enabler of a sexual predator.

Who does NOT get to play the Sexism Card against Trump.

 

[Faun]

Again, too fucking stupid. Since when is a criminal charge "less damaging" than a civil charge?

When the civil charge is Sexual Harassment and the criminal charge is just "lying about sex".

Stop being an ass about this.

More bullshit. Civil charges, at worst, cost money and possible disgrace.

Criminal charges carry those plus possible jail time.

Your failed attempts to alter reality are noted and dismissed.

Really? How much jail time did Bill serve?

He served no time.

Exactly.

The more dangerous charge was that one that could weaken his political power, ie the Harassment one.

Had she won, it would have been no more damaging. It was a civil case stemming from purported actions nearly a decade earlier where she claimed Clinton made an

Again, too fucking stupid. Since when is a criminal charge "less damaging" than a civil charge?

When the civil charge is Sexual Harassment and the criminal charge is just "lying about sex".

Stop being an ass about this.

More bullshit. Civil charges, at worst, cost money and possible disgrace.

Criminal charges carry those plus possible jail time.

Your failed attempts to alter reality are noted and dismissed.

Really? How much jail time did Bill serve?

He served no time.

Exactly.

The more dangerous charge was that one that could weaken his political power, ie the Harassment one.

The criminal charge carried far more weight and though he didn't serve time, the potential was there. It was not in the civil case. The point being, your claim of bias by the judge is ludicrous in the face of her finding Clinton in contempt of court. If she were biased, she didn't have to do that.

Face it, you just don't like the reality she found no merit whatsoever in Paula Jones' case. So what?

 

[Faun]

Why is Bill Clinton's difficulties from twenty years ago an issue for Hillary Clinton's campaign for President? It was a private matter between a husband and wife. She handled it the way she thought was best for her and her family. Bill and Hillary have been married to each other for decades. In that time, Trump has admitted and publicly been a multiple adulterer and had three wives. He is in no position to be giving lectures about marriage.

Because the right is desperate.

 

[TooTall]

It was a credible accusation,

And back then accusations of sexual harassment, regardless of credibility, destroyed men. Think Witch Hunt.

But Bill was too big to lose, so the Feminists, and the lib Media and the Dems all closed ranks and stone walled like nothing I had ever seen, before or since.

And changed the rules to give Bill a pass.

Riiiight .... it was so credible an accusation, that her accusation was thrown out of court due to lack of merit.

If you are referring to Paula Jones, the court awarded her $850,000.

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

The court awarded Jones bupkis. In fact, the court threw her case out due to lack of merit. In case you're unaware, courts do not award damages to the losing party. In reality, it was Clinton who offered her that settlement, which came with the agreement that it was not an admission of guilt but just a fuck off payoff after she filed an appeal after her case was thrown out. She took the money and ran. Paid off her lawyers and taxes and had a few bucks left to get a nose job.

Now ya know.

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

She was still in the appeals court when Clinton bought her off. She probably was looking at a million dollars in Lawyers fees and a smart lawyer would tell her to take the money offered so he could get paid. Of course it didn't cost Clinton a penny of his own money. He had immoral bleeding heart liberals like you donating to the Clinton defense fund and insurance to pay Paula Jones off.

 

[Faun]

Why is Bill Clinton's difficulties from twenty years ago an issue for Hillary Clinton's campaign for President? It was a private matter between a husband and wife. She handled it the way she thought was best for her and her family. Bill and Hillary have been married to each other for decades. In that time, Trump has admitted and publicly been a multiple adulterer and had three wives. He is in no position to be giving lectures about marriage.

And the way she handled it says a lot about the type of person she is.

IE an enabler of a sexual predator.

Who does NOT get to play the Sexism Card against Trump.

[Accused] sexual predator. And she can play whatever card she wants. Just like Trump or any other candidate.

 

[Camp]

Why is Bill Clinton's difficulties from twenty years ago an issue for Hillary Clinton's campaign for President? It was a private matter between a husband and wife. She handled it the way she thought was best for her and her family. Bill and Hillary have been married to each other for decades. In that time, Trump has admitted and publicly been a multiple adulterer and had three wives. He is in no position to be giving lectures about marriage.

And the way she handled it says a lot about the type of person she is.

IE an enabler of a sexual predator.

Who does NOT get to play the Sexism Card against Trump.

People like you are such fakes and hypocrites you fall into the realm of sad and demented. On one hand you preach small government and individual freedoms while on the other hand you claim to have a right to judge the extreme private matter of how a married couple deals with their private business.

 

[Faun]

Riiiight .... it was so credible an accusation, that her accusation was thrown out of court due to lack of merit.

If you are referring to Paula Jones, the court awarded her $850,000.

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

The court awarded Jones bupkis. In fact, the court threw her case out due to lack of merit. In case you're unaware, courts do not award damages to the losing party. In reality, it was Clinton who offered her that settlement, which came with the agreement that it was not an admission of guilt but just a fuck off payoff after she filed an appeal after her case was thrown out. She took the money and ran. Paid off her lawyers and taxes and had a few bucks left to get a nose job.

Now ya know.

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

She was still in the appeals court when Clinton bought her off. She probably was looking at a million dollars in Lawyers fees and a smart lawyer would tell her to take the money offered so he could get paid. Of course it didn't cost Clinton a penny of his own money. He had immoral bleeding heart liberals like you donating to the Clinton defense fund and insurance to pay Paula Jones off.

You're right in that a smart lawyer would advise their client to take the money and run since they want to get paid rather than risk another trial they could easily lose again since the first ended so badly for them.

An injured party, however, would want justice for their injury. Jones just wanted the money. She didn't care about justice. She didn't care about him being found guilty for the offense she accused him of. Hell, she didn't even care that the settlement was a statement that Clinton would not apologize.

She was in it for the money. Which she ended up with very little anyway. After taxes and after paying off her legal fees, she had barely enough left over to pay for a nose job.

 

[paulitician]

Looks like they finally got Bill Cosby. Will Bill Clinton be next? How many victims are out there?

 

[TooTall]

If you are referring to Paula Jones, the court awarded her $850,000.

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

The court awarded Jones bupkis. In fact, the court threw her case out due to lack of merit. In case you're unaware, courts do not award damages to the losing party. In reality, it was Clinton who offered her that settlement, which came with the agreement that it was not an admission of guilt but just a fuck off payoff after she filed an appeal after her case was thrown out. She took the money and ran. Paid off her lawyers and taxes and had a few bucks left to get a nose job.

Now ya know.

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

She was still in the appeals court when Clinton bought her off. She probably was looking at a million dollars in Lawyers fees and a smart lawyer would tell her to take the money offered so he could get paid. Of course it didn't cost Clinton a penny of his own money. He had immoral bleeding heart liberals like you donating to the Clinton defense fund and insurance to pay Paula Jones off.

You're right in tha a smart lawyer would advise their client to take the money and run since they want to get paid rather than risk another trial they could easily lose again since the first ended so badly for them.

An injured party, however, would want justice for their injury. Jones just wanted the money. She didn't care about justice. She didn't care about him being found guilty for the offense she accused him of. Hell, she didn't even care that the settlement was a statement that Clinton would not apologize.

She was in it for the money. Which she ended up with very little anyway. After taxes and after paying off her legal fees, she had barely enough left over to pay for a nose job.

Read this link from the Wall Street Journal and then tell me Clinton is an innocent victim. LMFAO.

The Clinton War on Women

 

[whitehall]

I find it incredible that the liberal media frightens (some) republicans so much that they refuse to make the connection between Hillary and her husband's serial sexual abuse of women. Remember when warrior John McCain was so scared of adverse publicity that he ordered his staff not to mention the president's middle name while the media was tearing Sara Palin's family apart? How long are timid republicans going to tolerate the double standard?

 

[Faun]

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

The court awarded Jones bupkis. In fact, the court threw her case out due to lack of merit. In case you're unaware, courts do not award damages to the losing party. In reality, it was Clinton who offered her that settlement, which came with the agreement that it was not an admission of guilt but just a fuck off payoff after she filed an appeal after her case was thrown out. She took the money and ran. Paid off her lawyers and taxes and had a few bucks left to get a nose job.

Now ya know.

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

She was still in the appeals court when Clinton bought her off. She probably was looking at a million dollars in Lawyers fees and a smart lawyer would tell her to take the money offered so he could get paid. Of course it didn't cost Clinton a penny of his own money. He had immoral bleeding heart liberals like you donating to the Clinton defense fund and insurance to pay Paula Jones off.

You're right in tha a smart lawyer would advise their client to take the money and run since they want to get paid rather than risk another trial they could easily lose again since the first ended so badly for them.

An injured party, however, would want justice for their injury. Jones just wanted the money. She didn't care about justice. She didn't care about him being found guilty for the offense she accused him of. Hell, she didn't even care that the settlement was a statement that Clinton would not apologize.

She was in it for the money. Which she ended up with very little anyway. After taxes and after paying off her legal fees, she had barely enough left over to pay for a nose job.

Read this link from the Wall Street Journal and then tell me Clinton is an innocent victim. LMFAO.

The Clinton War on Women

All I could see was the first paragragh.

 

[peach174]

Why is Bill Clinton's difficulties from twenty years ago an issue for Hillary Clinton's campaign for President? It was a private matter between a husband and wife. She handled it the way she thought was best for her and her family. Bill and Hillary have been married to each other for decades. In that time, Trump has admitted and publicly been a multiple adulterer and had three wives. He is in no position to be giving lectures about marriage.

Why would anyone want Bill back in the white house having sex with his wife's aids in the oval office?
The Oval Office is the people's office not his personal sexual playground.

 

[peach174]

In other words, Clinton paid her off with someone else's money so she wouldn't get her day in the appeals court to prove her case. He was guilty and even a pissant like you know that.

"President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history."

That's [almost] what I said. The difference is that he did offer her the money with the caveat it was neither an apology nor an admission of guilt; and she accepted that.

You'll note, she already had her day in court and her case was thrown out due to lack of merit. She didn't have to accept Clinton's deal. She chose to because she was only in it for the money and got what she wanted.

She was still in the appeals court when Clinton bought her off. She probably was looking at a million dollars in Lawyers fees and a smart lawyer would tell her to take the money offered so he could get paid. Of course it didn't cost Clinton a penny of his own money. He had immoral bleeding heart liberals like you donating to the Clinton defense fund and insurance to pay Paula Jones off.

You're right in tha a smart lawyer would advise their client to take the money and run since they want to get paid rather than risk another trial they could easily lose again since the first ended so badly for them.

An injured party, however, would want justice for their injury. Jones just wanted the money. She didn't care about justice. She didn't care about him being found guilty for the offense she accused him of. Hell, she didn't even care that the settlement was a statement that Clinton would not apologize.

She was in it for the money. Which she ended up with very little anyway. After taxes and after paying off her legal fees, she had barely enough left over to pay for a nose job.

Read this link from the Wall Street Journal and then tell me Clinton is an innocent victim. LMFAO.

The Clinton War on Women

All I could see was the first paragragh.

Me too.
I am not paying for it just so I can read the stupid article.