Trump wins Michigan

[miketx]

In the closest race for president in Michigan's history, Republican Donald Trump is hanging on to a 10,704 vote win over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The Michigan Secretary of State posted results Wednesday that were submitted by the state's 83 county clerks on Tuesday after the votes were reviewed and certified by each county.

Before that compiled count, Trump held a 13,107 lead over Clinton. But after each county certified its results, the lead shrunk to 10,704, with the biggest chunk coming from Wayne County, which showed that Clinton had gotten 565 more votes than originally tallied by the county...

The numbers are in: Trump wins Michigan by 10,704

In a side story, liberals still voting for Clinton.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jill Stein will call for a recount, and it will be granted.

She will call for recounts in WI and PA as well.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

In a side story, liberals still voting for Clinton.

Some have only voted once.

 

[S.J.]

In the closest race for president in Michigan's history, Republican Donald Trump is hanging on to a 10,704 vote win over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The Michigan Secretary of State posted results Wednesday that were submitted by the state's 83 county clerks on Tuesday after the votes were reviewed and certified by each county.

Before that compiled count, Trump held a 13,107 lead over Clinton. But after each county certified its results, the lead shrunk to 10,704, with the biggest chunk coming from Wayne County, which showed that Clinton had gotten 565 more votes than originally tallied by the county...

The numbers are in: Trump wins Michigan by 10,704

In a side story, liberals still voting for Clinton.

The polls are still open in the cemeteries?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

 

[miketx]

In the closest race for president in Michigan's history, Republican Donald Trump is hanging on to a 10,704 vote win over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The Michigan Secretary of State posted results Wednesday that were submitted by the state's 83 county clerks on Tuesday after the votes were reviewed and certified by each county.

Before that compiled count, Trump held a 13,107 lead over Clinton. But after each county certified its results, the lead shrunk to 10,704, with the biggest chunk coming from Wayne County, which showed that Clinton had gotten 565 more votes than originally tallied by the county...

The numbers are in: Trump wins Michigan by 10,704

In a side story, liberals still voting for Clinton.

The polls are still open in the cemeteries?

Ask the libtards.

 

[longknife]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

 

[Lewdog]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

 

[longknife]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

That still doesn't answer the question.

 

[Lewdog]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

That still doesn't answer the question.

Yes... yes it does. The recount isn't an actual count of the paper ballots, just verifying the information printed on out from the machines.

 

[Roudy]

Jill Stein will call for a recount, and it will be granted.

She will call for recounts in WI and PA as well.

But but but....RECOUNT!

 

[theHawk]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

 

[Roudy]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

 

[Roudy]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Poor Democraps, even with all the election fraud, criminal behavior, and rigging they normally do every cycle, they still couldn't get Hillary in.

 

[Lewdog]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

 

[Roudy]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars just because you lost.

You lose.

 

[Lewdog]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

It will not be granted, even CNN "experts" which are all Hillary shills have opined that those who are calling for it are on dope or other hallucinogenic drugs.

Won't be granted? On what grounds? The rules are, as long as a candidate asks for it, and is willing to pay the fees for it, and they meet the deadline to file for it... they can.

Won't be granted because A- there has to be evidence of "hacking" or "rigging" and B- the vote isn't close enough for the auto recall. C- you can't force an hand count of votes of four states costing in the tens of millions of dollars bpjust because you lost.

You lose.

Well what a fail post. A, there doesn't have to be beforehand evidence in order to call for a hand count of the paper ballots, it's one of the provisions associated with using computer voting. B, this isn't an auto recall. And C... the candidates are the ones that have to pay for the recount.

Why are you on here posting shit about something and you don't even know the VERY basic parts of the argument?

 

[Preacher]

Jill Stein will call for a recount, and it will be granted.

She will call for recounts in WI and PA as well.

Why's it matter? Its truly sad people are being fooled into giving up MILLIONS to the Green Party candidate to challenge some silly crap like this that has NOTHING to do with her. She still loses.

 

[Preacher]

I'm curious. There's all sorts of noise about a 3rd party candidate paying for recounts in three major states. This report is the FINAL result of an automatic recount due to the closeness of the result. How can she call (pay for) another recount? Isn't this a FINAL result?

Stein is calling for a hand count of the paper ballots to double check the electronic results.

AKA she is throwing an EPIC fit....hint hint SHE STILL LOSES!

 

[JakeStarkey]

They'll find boxes of ballots in the trunks of cars. Happened in Minnesota. That's what put Al Frankenstein in the Senate.

With Dems, those ballots just appear out of nowhere!

They did it in California. They changed regular voters to mail in on Election Day. That means their votes weren't counted and boxed up. They can then be swapped out with fraudulent ones and no one would ever know. Those mail in votes aren't counted until later. That's how Hillary's vote count keeps going up. Dems are masters of voter fraud.

Conspiracy nonsense with absolutely no proof at all. But that is how it was done for Trump in WI.