Trump's judgement of character, revisited

[basquebromance]

Trump is going to be greatest President since Ronald Reagan. You can just see it coming and it is making liberals crazy.

 

[Iceweasel]

No, it's a pretty good synopsis of what went on. Republicans are also big on Hillary going after Bill's women and lambasting her for her treatment of Bill's so-called "victims" (women who consented to have sex with Bill Clinton and then claimed ill treatment when it went bad).

Well I was married to a guy who was a total hound dog, and I thought that the women who slept with a married man, know her was married and had two small children, were selfish bitches who had no regard for the damage they were doing, or the pain they caused, and they didn't care. All they cared about was their good time, so as a result, I had no kind words for them either. If you expected Hillary to behave otherwise shows you know nothing about women.

Gennifer Flowers had an long-term affair with Clinton and says Bill would have left Hillary for her, but he didn't. Now she shills for Trump. Anita Broaddrick swore Bill never raped her until the FBI threatened to charge her with perjury if she didn't recant her sworn affidavit. Then she said whatever Republicans told her to say. You can't say you lied under oath, and then tell people you swear you aren't lying now.

You're a liar and propagandist. I have no idea why you think you can get away with it except that you have to be deranged. Paula Jones was able to describe Bill's penis since he had it out trying to entice her against her will. We down here in the US don't consider that consensual, I guess Canadians have different standards of behavior. Nor did women make claims "after it went bad". You just dug that out of your ass.

You read political trash then come here and puke it up in front of people that know better. What a dumb ass.

Paula Jones was not raped by Bill Clinton. There was no sexual contact between Paula Jones & Bill Clinton. Clinton exposed himself & asked for sex. She said no. That was it.

Meanwhile, you slobber all over your orange buddy who just gropes women, been accused of raping a 13 year old girl, invaded teennage girl's dressing rooms, cheated on his pregnant wife. You really need to STFU & quit lying about Bill Clinton.

It won't change the fact of the character of the perverted POS you voted for.

No one said Paula Jones was raped. You're retarded so your opinion is irrelevant.

Evidently, you have not read this thread.

You responded to me, genius. If your comment was for the world then don't post them to me. Paula Jones sued for harassment. That's a civil matter. Rape is a criminal matter. Maybe you should gather a few facts before spouting off.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I don't have much to say of Trump's ability to aptly judge others' character for the fact is that most people are of better character than is Trump, thus, using his own "character bar" as the standard by which he measures, it's all but certain he'd adjudge just about anyone to be of good, or good enough, character to deserve his encomium.

Bill was fired for being a pervert.

Bill was not fired for being a pervert. Our principle of "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law" requires that a court would have to adjudge him so for that to be asserted as so. ("Pervert" is quite likely not a term a court would use in rendering judgment/punishment, but the point is the same no matter the term.)

Bill was fired because his words and deeds were made public enough that his employer did not care to risk being seen as endorsing them or looking askance at them. Bill's dismissal is nothing more than a reflection of Fox having weighed the risks that he may indeed be a pervert. Fox, as a business matter, simply doesn't care to risk being seen as "the last holdout" were Bill's "issues" to land in court and the case decided in the plaintiff's favor. Had the matter been kept quiet until a court had decided on the matter, Bill would be at Fox.

Fox is a publicly held company, so the risk averse stance its management took is likely the best one for the shareholders' overall earnings potential from their interest in Fox. Well managed public companies make every decision, assume or reject every risk, based on that measure and that measure alone.

Edit:
Lest one doubt the veracity of my claim about Fox's not caring about O'Reilly's alleged perversion and miscreance, I bid one recall the Andrea Mackris case, which was in 2004, a civil case that Bill settled rather than fought on merit by O'Reilly. Then in 2011, there was the Juliet Huddy case against O'Reilly that Fox settled on Bill's behalf. In neither instance did Fox see fit to dismiss O'Reilly, yet clearly they were well aware of his words and deeds. So, no, Bill's perversion itself isn't at all what concerned Fox or motivated to let him go. To suggest that his perversions are what catalyzed their dismissal of O'Reilly is to cast in better light than Fox and its management's moral compass deserves.

Trump called to congratulate the leader of Turkey for passing a resolution that moved Turkey further from a free democracy to dictatorship.

Quite honestly, convincing one's own people to willfully and in effect vote to make one, in essence, an absolute monarch for the next dozen years is an act worthy of congratulations, no matter what one thinks of their having done so.

/---- The libtard didn't deserve such an eloquent and thoughtful response. Libtards are cowards who twist and distort the facts - nothing more than hit and run drunk drivers.