Uh Oh: Petraeus Prosecutor Looking Into Clinton Server

Were you as outraged at Karl Rove's use of a Private Server when he was at the White House as you are now?

Were you as outrage at the dissappearance of 18+Months of emails relating to run-up to Iraq War as you are now?

Manufactured Outrage...brought to by Fox New.

They Lie....YOU Believe.
 
Republicans do not want to believe anything that does not mean Hilary Clinton is innocent. Afte 7+Investigations into Benghazi there is nothing left to investigate and they are still desparate to believe something, anything as long as they cling to their lie.

They know they were lied to about Iraq.

They know they were lied to about Afghanistan.

They love being lied to.

Republicans live to be lied to.
And Clintons apparently live to be caught.

View attachment 47555

Caught at what?

Former Secretary Clinton has not been caught at anything.

She is no way responsible for any emails that were classified after the fact.

She is no way responsible for any emails that were not classified at that she sent before those emails. If the emails were no classified at the time of transmission no law was broken. She cannot be responsible for what she did not know.
The media is already saying she should have recognized the classification of those emails immediately. The emails also were classified (with the tags removed).
 
Were you as outraged at Karl Rove's use of a Private Server when he was at the White House as you are now?

Were you as outrage at the dissappearance of 18+Months of emails relating to run-up to Iraq War as you are now?

Manufactured Outrage...brought to by Fox New.

They Lie....YOU Believe.
Those are YOUR silly words only. Manufactured. Same with the despicable Cheney.

Both sides play a despicable gang.
 
Republicans do not want to believe anything that does not mean Hilary Clinton is innocent. Afte 7+Investigations into Benghazi there is nothing left to investigate and they are still desparate to believe something, anything as long as they cling to their lie.

They know they were lied to about Iraq.

They know they were lied to about Afghanistan.

They love being lied to.

Republicans live to be lied to.
And Clintons apparently live to be caught.

View attachment 47555

Caught at what?

Former Secretary Clinton has not been caught at anything.

She is no way responsible for any emails that were classified after the fact.

She is no way responsible for any emails that were not classified at that she sent before those emails. If the emails were no classified at the time of transmission no law was broken. She cannot be responsible for what she did not know.
The media is already saying she should have recognized the classification of those emails immediately. The emails also were classified (with the tags removed).

If by "The Media" you mean Fox, then your bias is blown. The F.B.I. has already stated for the record that there is no criminal investigation.

"She should have recognized the classification", how exactly was Ms. Clinton to recognize something that at the time DID NOT EXIST?

Ms. Clinton cannot be held responsible for the classification of documents that at the time of transmission WERE NOT CLASSIFIED. IF the document was NOT classifed, how is Ms. Clinton for then classifiying it?

Ms. Clinton receives an email. The email was transmitted without a security classification. Ms. Clinton reads the email and acknowledges the email. At the time of the transmission of the email it was NOT classified. Ms. Clintion was NOT responsible for classification of the message. The sender of message, the originator of the message had/has that responsibility. If the the message was transmitted in plain text without/absent a security warning, then there was no classification. You do understand that right?

Ms. Clinton is not responsible for the failure of the sender of the message for the failure to classifiy the message.

Rove had a personal/private sender on which he stored many emails regarding Afghanistan/Iraq and nothing. Your very selective in your MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE!!!
 
Petraeus wasn't a Clinton. He wasn't protected Globalist Elite Royalty. He was held accountable. Does anyone really believe Hillary Clinton will be?

Why does anyone still believe Dick(less) Cheney and the shrub?

Man, seriously? You're gonna go the 'BOOOOOOSH!!' route? Clinton being a corrupt asshole has nothing to do with the BOOOOOOSH.
 
Petraeus isn't part of the protected Elite class. Hillary is. Nothing will come of this. The Rule of Law is dead.
They've found 60 classified emails. They have no choice but to screw her royally.

Don't count on it. This will go away. She will not go the way of Petraeus. She's a very powerful and well-protected Globalist Elite Royal. Petraeus was a commoner. He didn't have that kind of protection.
 

Someday you will find a reliable, recognized journalist rather than some right wing nut job who wears a tin foil hat for your sources.

So, is it your contention that this prosecutor isn't looking into this?

Bush and Clinton are both elitist and you know it, you are fixated on Clinton like the good lemming you know you are.
 

Someday you will find a reliable, recognized journalist rather than some right wing nut job who wears a tin foil hat for your sources.

So, is it your contention that this prosecutor isn't looking into this?

Bush and Clinton are both elitist and you know it, you are fixated on Clinton like the good lemming you know you are.


how come leftardz can never answer a question?
 
Republicans do not want to believe anything that does not mean Hilary Clinton is innocent. Afte 7+Investigations into Benghazi there is nothing left to investigate and they are still desparate to believe something, anything as long as they cling to their lie.

They know they were lied to about Iraq.

They know they were lied to about Afghanistan.

They love being lied to.

Republicans live to be lied to.
And Clintons apparently live to be caught.

View attachment 47555

Caught at what?

Former Secretary Clinton has not been caught at anything.

She is no way responsible for any emails that were classified after the fact.

She is no way responsible for any emails that were not classified at that she sent before those emails. If the emails were no classified at the time of transmission no law was broken. She cannot be responsible for what she did not know.
The media is already saying she should have recognized the classification of those emails immediately. The emails also were classified (with the tags removed).

If by "The Media" you mean Fox, then your bias is blown. The F.B.I. has already stated for the record that there is no criminal investigation.

"She should have recognized the classification", how exactly was Ms. Clinton to recognize something that at the time DID NOT EXIST?

Ms. Clinton cannot be held responsible for the classification of documents that at the time of transmission WERE NOT CLASSIFIED. IF the document was NOT classifed, how is Ms. Clinton for then classifiying it?

Ms. Clinton receives an email. The email was transmitted without a security classification. Ms. Clinton reads the email and acknowledges the email. At the time of the transmission of the email it was NOT classified. Ms. Clintion was NOT responsible for classification of the message. The sender of message, the originator of the message had/has that responsibility. If the the message was transmitted in plain text without/absent a security warning, then there was no classification. You do understand that right?

Ms. Clinton is not responsible for the failure of the sender of the message for the failure to classifiy the message.

Rove had a personal/private sender on which he stored many emails regarding Afghanistan/Iraq and nothing. Your very selective in your MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE!!!
You are so wrong.
1) When asked if the investigation was criminal, the FBI said, "All their investigations are criminal."

2) If Clinton would receive a letter from a pilot instructor, telling her that 10 Muslims had come in and requested flying lessons, but not the part of taking off and landing and he was worried about it due to 9/11. he wouldn't have labeled it Top Secret. If she was an effective SOS, she would have labeled it such because he included the names and addresses of each student. Then she would send it to the proper agencies.

3) Clinton would be responsible for the sender of the message to classify the message. It was her job to mark it.

4) It was reported in the news that Top Secret marking may have been removed by her or her aides!
 
Were you as outraged at Karl Rove's use of a Private Server when he was at the White House as you are now?

Were you as outrage at the dissappearance of 18+Months of emails relating to run-up to Iraq War as you are now?

Manufactured Outrage...brought to by Fox New.

They Lie....YOU Believe.
Those are YOUR silly words only. Manufactured. Same with the despicable Cheney.

Both sides play a despicable gang.

No, just being honest.

Karl Rover used a Private Server during his time in White House. Over 18-Months of his Afghanistan/Iraq are missing and the Republicans did say say one fucking word about that.

Comes Hilary Clinton and their all Henny Penny with the Sky Falling.

The Ye Olde Republican Double Standard is Alive and Well.
 
When Millions of Lost Bush White House Emails received a shrub.
FLASHBACK When Millions Of Lost Bush White House Emails From Private Accounts Triggered A Media Shrug Blog Media Matters for America

Karl Rover erased Twenty-Two Million (22,000,000) Emails.
.http://www.ensitoreview.com/2015/03...t-height-of-u-s-attorney-scandal-media-yawns/.

Media Reaction to 22,000,000 Emails going missing.
The media reaction to George W. Bush s email controversy PunditFact

There is just one whole helluva lot of the "Do as I say, Not as I do" going on with the Republicans over Hilary Clinton's emails.

Not much over the 22,000,000 that went missing from the Bush White House. No demands for Karl Rove to explain himself.

Ye Olde Republican Double Standard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top