Unemployment benefits aren't causing a labor shortage. Low wages are. What if, and this may sound wild, businesses paid low wage workers more

[Slyhunter]

I have a problem with a company that pays so little their employees still qualify for welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation can solve simple poverty.

What about complex poverty? Fuck those people?
You regurgitate garbage that absolutely crumbles under logical scrutiny.

Means tested welfare is for complex poverty. Not my fault you are that ignorant, Right-Winger.

 

[danielpalos]

The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.

No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument

You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.

 

[danielpalos]

If someone asks me to perform a task for $5 an hour, and I agree to do it, why is it anyone else's business?

Because you turn around and collect government benefits to make up for the fact you didn't make a livable wage.

Some do, some don't. If you have a problem with the social safety hammock, just say so.

I only have a problem with unequal protection of the law.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Which does not exist

 

[Soupnazi630]

The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.

No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument

You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.

I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.

 

[danielpalos]

Which does not exist

Yes, it does. For-cause criteria for only Labor as the least wealthy in our at-will employment States is repugnant to Intent and express law regarding equal protection.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

 

[danielpalos]

The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.

No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument

You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.

I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.

StewNazis have more substantial arguments.

 

[Slyhunter]

The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.

No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument

You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.

I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.

StewNazis have more substantial arguments.

I bet you never watch Friends. What country taught you English. You ain't American.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law already.

No, we don't have equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation or Government would have solved simple poverty, Yesterday.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

Yes we do and the government cannot solve poverty no matter what it does. Those are hisgtoric facts and you are a liar posting fallacies.
You are also now posting circular arguments which are self defeating and which prove you have no ability to post a rational argument

You have no idea what you are talking about and prove it every day.

I am superior to you in every way and have proven you an ignorant liar.

StewNazis have more substantial arguments.

You have no substantial argujments

 

[Soupnazi630]

Which does not exist

Yes, it does. For-cause criteria for only Labor as the least wealthy in our at-will employment States is repugnant to Intent and express law regarding equal protection.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No it does not.

Labor is a verb and has no rights.

 

[danielpalos]

You need valid arguments for rebuttal. Thanks for playing, right-wingers.

 

[danielpalos]

This is the argument:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Thus, for-cause criteria for unemployment compensation is extra-legal and repugnant to Individual Liberty and natural rights, along with the equal protection of the laws guaranteed in our State and federal Constitutions.

 

[initforme]

Most employers don't want to keep their best workers. This is a fact.

 

[danielpalos]

Most employers don't want to keep their best workers. This is a fact.

Why do you believe that? It should be more profitable for them to keep their best employees, ceteris paribus.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

The fact is some of these people do not deserve better pay…

 

[danielpalos]

The fact is some of these people do not deserve better pay…

He was arguing that employers don't want to keep their best employees.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

danielpalos I was responding to Basque OP.

 

[danielpalos]

sure thing.

 

[initforme]

Good employees are always looking to leave. Other than a good days work loyalty is no longer a part of the equation thankfully.