Until They "Shuffle Off This Mortal Coil"....

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
128,271
Reaction score
64,290
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1. Who is shocked that the most fervent Democrats want their political opponent murdered? No one.
The two most intrinsic characteristics of Democrat true believers are lies and violence.
Not to "gild the lily," but these are not good people.


2. A look at the recent past will reveal how similar antagonisms were resolved: the racist South.....all Democrats, and the lie that the recist became Republican.
The basic “Southern Strategy” myth, popularized by Kevin Phillips in the early 1970s, goes like this: under LBJ’s leadership, Democrats nobly and self-sacrificingly supported civil rights [1946-1965], giving an opening to opportunistic Republicans to crack the Democratic Solid South; following the support given by voters in some Deep South states to Goldwater in 1964, Nixon (formerly a supporter of civil rights) developed a “Southern Strategy” to use coded appeals to southern whites, enabling him to win the 1968 election; and everything the GOP has accomplished since 1968 is tainted by a continuous reliance on that same strategy to keep white southerners in the fold.


3. But the reality is quite different from the myth. At the center of the Southern Strategy myth is the idea that Republicans used the race card to seduce Democratic voters in the South into leaving their natural partisan home.
The truth, … is the opposite: the growth of GOP support among white Southerners was steady and mostly gradual from 1928 to 2010, … ...the Democrats’ use of racial issues. In other words, ...
The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority



4. Unable to comprehend that Southern Americans are not the racists that the Democrats are, they had to find some explanation for their ancient base, the South, turning to vote Republican. Sooo….they claimed that Nixon campaigned as a racist to gain the Deep South, to win over the Dixiecrats and segregationists to the Republican fold.

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.
The two biggest issues in the 1968 campaign were the Vietnam War…and the anti-war movement….
Nixon campaigned on a strong anti-communist, law and order platform. While embracing the welfare state- Nixon was no conservative on domestic issues- he also railed against what he termed ‘the excesses of bleeding heart liberalism.’”
"Death Of A Nation,” Dinesh D’Souza, p. 203




5.The violent Democrats torching Teslas and threatening assination will not change. They are not capable of change.
What will happen over time is exactly what happened to the lynch and racist Democrats.....

Rather than the Republicans winning the Dixiecrat vote, the Dixiecrats simply died out. By contrast, racist Democrats kept winning the alleged “segregationist” states into the ‘90’s. If states were voting for Goldwater out of racism, what of Carter’s 1976 sweep of all the Goldwater states?​




Need a timeline for the improvement of the party?

Life-long racist Bill Clinton......his name carries less and less imprimatur.
 
My main complaint about democrats is that they steal from taxpayers and not a word from the MSM

$140b DOGE fraud claims

Add them together and the democrats scammed $580b from taxpayers, and no one hears about it?!
 
My main complaint about democrats is that they steal from taxpayers and not a word from the MSM

$140b DOGE fraud claims

Add them together and the democrats scammed $580b from taxpayers, and no one hears about it?!
The answer is eminently simple: every mode and means of the disseminaton of information is controlled by the Bolsheviks/Democrats.

The bad news:
"Over the past several decades, the progressive Left has successfully fulfilled Antonio Gramsci’s famed admonition of a “long march through the institutions”. In almost every Western country, its adherents now dominate the education system, media, cultural institutions, and financial behemoths." Is this the end of progressive America?


The good news,
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."

....and Trump won.


Did you see today's market?
 
1. Who is shocked that the most fervent Democrats want their political opponent murdered? No one.
The two most intrinsic characteristics of Democrat true believers are lies and violence.
Not to "gild the lily," but these are not good people.


2. A look at the recent past will reveal how similar antagonisms were resolved: the racist South.....all Democrats, and the lie that the recist became Republican.
The basic “Southern Strategy” myth, popularized by Kevin Phillips in the early 1970s, goes like this: under LBJ’s leadership, Democrats nobly and self-sacrificingly supported civil rights [1946-1965], giving an opening to opportunistic Republicans to crack the Democratic Solid South; following the support given by voters in some Deep South states to Goldwater in 1964, Nixon (formerly a supporter of civil rights) developed a “Southern Strategy” to use coded appeals to southern whites, enabling him to win the 1968 election; and everything the GOP has accomplished since 1968 is tainted by a continuous reliance on that same strategy to keep white southerners in the fold.


3. But the reality is quite different from the myth. At the center of the Southern Strategy myth is the idea that Republicans used the race card to seduce Democratic voters in the South into leaving their natural partisan home.
The truth, … is the opposite: the growth of GOP support among white Southerners was steady and mostly gradual from 1928 to 2010, … ...the Democrats’ use of racial issues. In other words, ...
The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority



4. Unable to comprehend that Southern Americans are not the racists that the Democrats are, they had to find some explanation for their ancient base, the South, turning to vote Republican. Sooo….they claimed that Nixon campaigned as a racist to gain the Deep South, to win over the Dixiecrats and segregationists to the Republican fold.

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.
The two biggest issues in the 1968 campaign were the Vietnam War…and the anti-war movement….
Nixon campaigned on a strong anti-communist, law and order platform. While embracing the welfare state- Nixon was no conservative on domestic issues- he also railed against what he termed ‘the excesses of bleeding heart liberalism.’”
"Death Of A Nation,” Dinesh D’Souza, p. 203




5.The violent Democrats torching Teslas and threatening assination will not change. They are not capable of change.
What will happen over time is exactly what happened to the lynch and racist Democrats.....

Rather than the Republicans winning the Dixiecrat vote, the Dixiecrats simply died out. By contrast, racist Democrats kept winning the alleged “segregationist” states into the ‘90’s. If states were voting for Goldwater out of racism, what of Carter’s 1976 sweep of all the Goldwater states?​




Need a timeline for the improvement of the party?

Life-long racist Bill Clinton......his name carries less and less imprimatur.
If you are interested in facts instead of the rambling musings of an insane conspiracy theory nut like DeSousa, you'll have to go to somebody other than DeSousa. He's crazy.
 
If you are interested in facts instead of the rambling musings of an insane conspiracy theory nut like DeSousa, you'll have to go to somebody other than DeSousa. He's crazy.
He may be, according to your view,"crazy," but he's not stupid.

I still enjoy you trying to claim I misspelled a word, why you simply lack the extensive vocabulary I have....and I'm not a native English speaker......


“If you are going to all the trouble of trying so hard to sound like what you think a smart person sounds like, you shouldn't start out by misspelling a simple word like obtuse. Spell check is your friend.”

Why I Am A Constitutional Textualist post#13

There is no sense you "trying so hard to sound like what you think a smart person sounds like," you moron.....

The word is "abstruse."


Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
ab·struse
/əbˈstro͞os/
adjective
I'm still laughing at how you were hung by your own petard.....





You claimed I misspelled "obtuse,' because you didn't know the word 'abstruse."
 
Last edited:
Who is shocked at P C's lie "Who is shocked that the most fervent Democrats want their political opponent murdered? No one."? No one, of course.
 
Who is shocked at P C's lie "Who is shocked that the most fervent Democrats want their political opponent murdered? No one."? No one, of course.

Majority of 'left of center' respondents justify assassination ...​

1744126108483.webp
Straight Arrow News
https://san.com › Media Miss
13 hours ago — The NCRI reports that 55% of self-identified leftists believe murdering President Trump is at least somewhat justifiable.

Survey: 55 Percent of Leftists Say Trump Murder Would Be ...​

1744126108511.webp
WLS 890 AM
 
Fake news.

But I am hearing more GOP and some MAGA, we have to do something about Trump, and some of it is not peaceful.
 
Fake news.

But I am hearing more GOP and some MAGA, we have to do something about Trump, and some of it is not peaceful.
This is the sort of fool who is a true beliver of the Bolsheviks. He is beyond learning or even experience. I wish death on no one.....but, the future will be better when this sort reaches their sell-by date.
 
This is the sort of fool who is a true beliver of the Bolsheviks. He is beyond learning or even experience. I wish death on no one.....but, the future will be better when this sort reaches their sell-by date.
You are a self-fulfiling gaslighter.
 
He may be, according to your view,"crazy," but he's not stupid.

I still enjoy you trying to claim I misspelled a word, why you simply lack the extensive vocabulary I have....and I'm not a native English speaker......


“If you are going to all the trouble of trying so hard to sound like what you think a smart person sounds like, you shouldn't start out by misspelling a simple word like obtuse. Spell check is your friend.”

Why I Am A Constitutional Textualist post#13

There is no sense you "trying so hard to sound like what you think a smart person sounds like," you moron.....

The word is "abstruse."


Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
ab·struse
/əbˈstro͞os/
adjective
I'm still laughing at how you were hung by your own petard.....





You claimed I misspelled "obtuse,' because you didn't know the word 'abstruse."
I'm sure you are going to bask in the glow of that one word forever. good for you. It must be hard going through life with so little to be proud of. Desousa is a nut case.
 
I'm sure you are going to bask in the glow of that one word forever. good for you. It must be hard going through life with so little to be proud of. Desousa is a nut case.
She is well matched then.
 
I'm sure you are going to bask in the glow of that one word forever. good for you. It must be hard going through life with so little to be proud of. Desousa is a nut case.
That one ....error....or yours?

Hardly.


You self-identified as a liar here:
My post…#28:



"Speaking of facts......what moved you to support this?

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And......which is your favorite?"





“Your silly list isn't factual, ….”

https://www.usmessageboard.com/thre...er-and-propaganda.980026/page-3#post-30006205 post 48
 
That one ....error....or yours?

Hardly.


You self-identified as a liar here:
My post…#28:



"Speaking of facts......what moved you to support this?

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And......which is your favorite?"





“Your silly list isn't factual, ….”

https://www.usmessageboard.com/thre...er-and-propaganda.980026/page-3#post-30006205 post 48
Quite an impressive straw man you've built for yourself. I'm sure you've convinced yourself it's all true too. You crazy MAGAs have such a vivid imagination. and with no one sane to draw you back to reality, there is no telling what might tumble from your tiny brain.
 
Quite an impressive straw man you've built for yourself. I'm sure you've convinced yourself it's all true too. You crazy MAGAs have such a vivid imagination. and with no one sane to draw you back to reality, there is no telling what might tumble from your tiny brain.
America was convinced they were all true......that's why your sort was put in the corner.
 
so? He won an election. wasn't even a big win. Mediocre at best.
You're lying again. Seems to be your nature.


— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 4, 2025
Here's how that beatdown went:

JOY BEHAR: He (Trump) has only been in office six weeks. It seems like six years, doesn't it? And he's been going around with his cronies, tabbing (sic) his so-called "landslide" and "blowout" win. But he won the popular vote by 1.5 percent, one of the smallest ever, he won the general election by less than fifty percent. So what kind of mandate is this really?
Now, there's so much wrong with that opening remark, so much ignorance aggressively on display here, that it's difficult to know where to begin. Fortunately, Stephen A. Smith took care of that.

STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.



In your face, boooyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeee.
 
You're lying again. Seems to be your nature.



Here's how that beatdown went:


Now, there's so much wrong with that opening remark, so much ignorance aggressively on display here, that it's difficult to know where to begin. Fortunately, Stephen A. Smith took care of that.





In your face, boooyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeee.
Trump's win was by less than Jimmy Carter's. Much less than Obama's or Clinton's. Just because trump repeats a lie doesn't make it true.
 
You're lying again. Seems to be your nature.
Here's how that beatdown went:
Now, there's so much wrong with that opening remark, so much ignorance aggressively on display here, that it's difficult to know where to begin. Fortunately, Stephen A. Smith took care of that.In your face, boooyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeee.
Stephen A. Smith? We should be laughing out loud, not discussing him.
 
Back
Top Bottom