Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,000
- 2,635
- Thread starter
- #361
I've proved everything I said with verifiable news sources, court documents and direct quotes.I don't need to refute a single word he said because you haven't provided a single official document to support it.Fucking moron, you're not debating. You're saying, "nuh-uh." You've literally offered nothing other than "nuh-uh" to refute a word Fitzgerald said.We can spend the next two years debating the whole Nigergate episode all over again, but I'd rather not. The bottom line is that you have nothing other than Fitzgerald's say-so that Plame was covert, and no one but bootlicking delusional Trump haters are going to accept that.Fucking moron, you're quoting an op/ed by Ann Coulter.LOLOL
So you bitch, but you're a fucking moron. Meanwhile, you can't show how she used her office to harm Bush, as you ridiculously claimed.
Wilson said Bush's famed "16 words" in his 2003 State of the Union address -- "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" -- were a lie.
Britain's Butler Commission reviewed its government's pre-war intelligence on Iraq and concluded that "the British government had intelligence from several different sources indicating that this visit was for the purpose of acquiring uranium."
Wilson's claim was again proved false when our own Senate Intelligence Committee also concluded, in July 2004, that Saddam Hussein had sought uranium from Niger.
So there went the White House's motive for muddying up Wilson: Government fact-finding commissions, here and in the United Kingdom, were muddying up Wilson on their own simply by finding facts.
Plame and Wilson were obviously collaborating to discredit the Bush administration, and they were lying.
Meanwhile, what Butler said was that Britain's Intel was "seriously flawed" and their sources were "unreliable."
As far as Bush's infamous 16 words, no less than 6 different people with intimate knowledge admitted those words, which had been pulled out of a previous speech due to lack of credibility, should not have been in Bush's State of the Union address...
- "Those 16 words should never have been included in the text written for the president. This was a mistake" ~ George Tenet, CIA Director
- "What we've said subsequently is, knowing what we now know, that some of the Niger documents were apparently forged, we wouldn't have put this in the President's speech -- but that's knowing what we know now." ~ Condoleezza Rice, National Security Adviser
- "That was a big mistake. It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson to tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us anything we didn't already know. I never believed it." ~ Colin Powell, Secretary of State
- "should have been taken out of the State of the Union." ~ Stephen Hadley, top aide to Condoleezza Rice
- "The process failed." ~ Dan Bartlett, White House Communications Director
- "Now, we've long acknowledged -- and this is old news, we've said this repeatedly -- that the information on yellow cake did, indeed, turn out to be incorrect." ~ Ari Fleischer, White House Press Secretary
Stephen Hadley also said, "the CIA had reservations about the British reporting" on Iraq's alleged attempts to buy uranium from the west African country of Niger. "These reservations were confirmed by the CIA," Hadley said about why Tenet had those 16 words pulled out of a previous speech.
And again, I have more than Fitzgerald's opinion. I have the unclassified CIA record of her employment showing she served overseas under cover. And I have the CIA asking the Department of Justice to open an investigation into who outed one of their agents.
But even if all I had was Fitzgerald's opinion, that would still be infinitely more than what you're bringing to the debate, which is no more than "nuh-uh." Fitzgerald, like Mueller, was a Special Counsel who investigated a potential crime. If I were a fucking moron like you, my argument would be nuh-uh trump is innocent of colluding with Russia. That's only Mueller's opinion.
Do you see now why you're a fucking moron, fucking moron?
You have "unclassified CIA record of her employment showing she served overseas under cover?" Then post it.
Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Furthermore, even Mueller didn't claim that Trump colluded with Russia
All you've posted is, "nuh-uh!"
![dance :dance: :dance:](/styles/smilies/dance.gif)
"Furthermore, even Mueller didn't claim that Trump colluded with Russia"
Fucking moron, Mueller said trump didn't collude with Russia. Applying your brain-dead "nuh-uh" denials to that case, that's only Mueller's "opinion" which means trump did collude with Russia. Do you see now why you're such a fucking moron?