wake up libs

What about your paycheck being handed out to negligent and irresponsible corporations who bribe congressmen for money, and don't pay taxes because they're based offshore?

It's called corporate welfare. It's what Republicans do well.

Who have you actually seen supporting this?

Do you think that the Dems actually stop this? No, their hands are simply in different places....
 
Who have you actually seen supporting this?

Do you think that the Dems actually stop this? No, their hands are simply in different places....

You're assuming that my criticism of the Republican party comes with a close affinity for Democrats.

Both parties support and maintain this type of political system, although it's more so Republicans than Democrats. Congressmen take bribes or indirect campaign contributions from corporate lobbies in order to promote corporate interests in government, hand out taxpayer money as financial bailout to corporations, and/or propose legislation that favours corporate interests over the general interests of the public. Many of these congressmen eventually retire from politics to take positions as lobbyists or boardroom members for the same corporations and industries they worked so hard for during their political careers. I can do the research to provide you with specific examples if you'd like, as I highly doubt you will pursue to educate yourself on how your government truly works, but your attempt to dismiss the fact that Republicans too hand out public money to those who don't deserve it is laughable.

In a perfect conservative world, conservatives never do wrong.
 
Last edited:
when will this madness end? can any obama supporter give me ONE valid reason why they are voting for him?? without mentioning change? he wants to get rid of the need for oil within 10 years?? do you realize how many products are made from oil? you libs wouldn't bBut it takes heavy fossil fuels to maintain an industrial basee able to drive your overpriced hybrids if there wasnt oil which is needed for APHALT. just to name one...

none of his ideas are new. its called socialism, and its never worked, read a history book.

You haven't been paying attention. Obama has not advocated getting rid of the need for oil. He is advocating getting rid of the need to burn oil for energy.

Your comment points out one of the most important reasons to stop burning oil, it is far to valuable a resource to simply burn up for energy.

Will future people not want plastics? Fertilizers? Chemicals?
 
the needy? you mean the people who are to lazy to work?
ill be damned to watch my paycheck goto people who refuse to work because they are supported from the government.

i'm the needy too after i blow my 400k+ a year salary at the horse races. so please support me.

oh and there are no positives with barack hussein obama. he is a racist and a communist.

do you really think 'the needy' are all lazy? if you really think the only reason people are poor is because they are lazy, i suggest you get out in the real world and talk with some people
 
When compared to countries that adhere more closely to theoretical capitalism (such as Mexico and Brazil), the United States has a superior standard of living and wealth distribution.

an FYI, the wealth distribution really isnt that much better.
in brazil, the top 10% of the population has 75% of the wealth.
in the US, the top 10% has 68.8%, with the top 5% having 59%.


Wealth Distribution in Brazil Expat American Living in Brazil
US Wealth Distribution Data (1998)
Wealth Distribution
 
1). What alternatives? Maintaining tire pressure? That is not a plan,thats just ingnorance.

2). We already have free health insurance for the needy. It is called Medicare. Plus, if you don't want that go to a free clinic,every city has one.

3). His foreign policy is the same as Mcain's only he changed his mind three times to get there.

i get the feeling you dont actually understand the issues. try reading about them before commenting. you know the saying about being thought a fool, right?
 
do you really think 'the needy' are all lazy? if you really think the only reason people are poor is because they are lazy, i suggest you get out in the real world and talk with some people

let me clear this up.

if you do not work because you like the government supporting your life style, you do not deserve any of my paycheck.

if you do not work because you made poor choices and have bastard children, you do not deserve any of my paycheck.

if you do not work because of the "glass ceiling", you do not deserve any of my paycheck.

if you do not work because mcdonalds does not pay enough, we all started somewhere and again, you do not deserve any of my paycheck.

if you are an illegal immigrant, you do not deserve any of my paycheck.

if you do not work because you are medically unable too(assuming you are a legal citizen), you can have a part of my paycheck.
 
Last edited:
You haven't been paying attention. Obama has not advocated getting rid of the need for oil. He is advocating getting rid of the need to burn oil for energy.

Your comment points out one of the most important reasons to stop burning oil, it is far to valuable a resource to simply burn up for energy.

Will future people not want plastics? Fertilizers? Chemicals?

how does barack hussein obama feel about nuclear power?

also, the "smoke" or the reality which is steam that you see coming out of a coal power plant's stack is cleaner then the exhaust from your car.

oh one more thing, natural gas power plants may look pretty, but each one of those turbines inside that pretty building burns more natural gas in 1 hour then 5 americans could use in a lifetime.
 
how does barack hussein obama feel about nuclear power?

also, the "smoke" or the reality which is steam that you see coming out of a coal power plant's stack is cleaner then the exhaust from your car.

oh one more thing, natural gas power plants may look pretty, but each one of those turbines inside that pretty building burns more natural gas in 1 hour then 5 americans could use in a lifetime.

hahaha, oh no! a power plant which creates electricity for thousands if not millions of americans uses more fuel than some individuals in their lifetime! terrifying :)

bring on the electric car. power plants are more efficient than small scale combustion engines.


john sidney mccain also backs natural gas
Driving Today: McCain Backs Natural Gas
 
LOL! Are you going to try and tell me that, if I were to walk around outside in 2005, and ask people who Obama was, they would be able to answer that?

:lol:

Oh, and way to only address the "nobody knew him" part. You didn't miss the fact that he has virtually no real personal achievements, did you? So much for experience.

Frankly, anyone who voted for a subliterate like Bush really has no credibilty in demanding "experience"....
 
hahaha, oh no! a power plant which creates electricity for thousands if not millions of americans uses more fuel than some individuals in their lifetime! terrifying :)

bring on the electric car. power plants are more efficient than small scale combustion engines.


john sidney mccain also backs natural gas
Driving Today: McCain Backs Natural Gas

If alternative energy is important, you can't vote for McCain. Oil companies don't want electric cars, and McCain works for the oil companies. But I guess Obama laughed during a question about abortion so you have no choice but to vote against your own best interests. :cuckoo:
 
If alternative energy is important, you can't vote for McCain. Oil companies don't want electric cars, and McCain works for the oil companies. But I guess Obama laughed during a question about abortion so you have no choice but to vote against your own best interests. :cuckoo:

how does mccain work for the oil companies? if he has ties i really want to know.


and just cause i have problems with obama doesnt mean i dont also have them with mccain
 
wow, you can post an opinion article, which you complain about when other people do that. and guess what? come closer. closer. UNDER BUSH AND THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS THE WEALTHY STILL HAD HIGHER TAX RATES THAN THE POOR. the article is complaining about little more than the wealthy having higher taxes, and that has existed under libs and cons. try again to show these sweeping changes obama will implement to turn us all into the evil socialists. free college? when was that said? universal coverage? you mean his plan to allow everyone to afford insurance, where the hospitals would still be private? job training for criminals? you mean rehabbing them instead of having the revolving door prison system or simply killing them off or locking them up forever (which is expensive?) not worth my time to refute every little point

Which is exactly what defines socialism/communism.

And I don't complain when people post opinion articles, I complain when they don't provide links, or when they post incoherent blathering with no facts and just raving...and then are put forth by ignorami as "fact". Mine, while it may or may not be an opinion article, takes facts and goes from there.
 
Last edited:
Frankly, anyone who voted for a subliterate like Bush really has no credibilty in demanding "experience"....

Hey, Jillie..did you make it into Harvard? I think you are just experiencing intellect envy.
 
Which is exactly what defines socialism/communism.

And I don't complain when people post opinion articles, I complain when they don't provide links, or when they post incoherent blathering with no facts and just raving...and then are put forth by ignorami as "fact". Mine, while it may or may not be an opinion article, takes facts and goes from there.

i remember posting a piece from the economist, and you dismissed it because it was an opinion article :eusa_whistle:
 
how does mccain work for the oil companies? if he has ties i really want to know.


and just cause i have problems with obama doesnt mean i dont also have them with mccain

Are you kidding?

McCain said a few years ago that he was against off shore drilling and he was for a windfall profit tax on the oil companies. Now he says the exact opposite.

Bush is an oil man. McCain only got the nomination because he agreed not to be a "maverick" when it comes to the oil companies.

I can't believe you even have to ask.

Lets see, McCain has lobbyist ties to just about everyone, so let's see if I can dig up oil lobbyists too. One second.

McCain, Iraq and Chevron

Colombia’s Oil Profile

McCain’s Colombia Ties

Charlie Black and Santo Domingo Massacre

Occidental and the U’wa

Promoting Oil Development through Militarization

Hopelessly Compromised on Colombia

McCain?s Big Oil Ties: From Colombia to Iraq | North American Congress on Latin America
 
Anyone who has ever seen McCain and Bush speak knows McCain is no Bush. I wish we'd had him for the last 4 years instead of Bush. I don't see any reluctance in McCain to confront difficult questions and issues head-on. The one major problem with Bush was that while I believe he was committed to his own vision of the US and his part in it, he was far to reluctant to address his critics and speak directly to the issues, without sugar coating it.

But they both have Obama beat hands down. Obama wouldn't know a straight answer if it sat on his face and wiggled, and is the master of mouthing platitudes which mean absolutely nothing and NEVER answer the question being asked. Why doesn't he want to answer the question? Because ultimately, he wants to change the US into something else, he doesn't like the US, and HE DOESN'T WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW because he knows they will not support it.
 
Bullshit, nothing but more of the same from you!

Ha ha Charlie. She is so right about you. You voted for Bush twice. The Texas Legislature meets 2 times a year. How much experience did Bush have. And even after he fucked up for 4 years and you knew he sucked, you voted for him again. You should be banned from voting. Litmus test on voting is if you voted for Bush in 2004. Dummy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top