abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,238
- 2,569
- 315
As I said on Page Eight in This thread that is Incorrect.No. I insist. Let’s have you mindlessly repeat this consensus shit when the point has been made that “consensus” in science is not what governs. Please. Go right ahead. Very persuasive. More. More.
Many/Most here certainly saw it but No one could reply to that post.
YOU posted !!SEVEN times!! on that page but were Mum.
Again:
Vaccines are also a Consensus. About the same in percent as AGW among specialists in the field.
They work.
Their benefit outweighs their side effects and the few anti-vaxxers/deniers.
One CAN find a few articles/studies about the evils of C19 vaccine (and AGW), but it's a strong consensus they are a positive.
Science works BY consensus.
Scientific Theories are Not proven, they are affirmed by consistent observations over time.
AGW, Atomic theory, Evolution, etc.
And of course Climate scientists are Not "Neurotic basket cases," the Trolling OP.
Pre-Sig: I Post ON TOPIC.
To the degree your post is I thank you.
But I will do my best to embarrass and put down One-line or Insult-only trolls due to the Lack of moderation on USMB. (Home OF the RW trolls.. perhaps 70%)
`
Last edited: