Warren Won't Win She Says No More War

[lennypartiv]

It's like Vietnam all over again. The libs can't wait to protest.

<< No war with Iran. De-escalation now.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who is running for president, called the move "reckless" in an initial tweet Thursday night. Friday, she followed up with a series of tweets saying the strike brought the U.S. to "the brink of yet another war in the Middle East—one that would be devastating in terms of lives lost and resources wasted." >>

'No War With Iran': Massachusetts Lawmakers On Soleimani Killing

 

[Rocko]

She’s just trying to capitalize politically in her career at the expense of America’s creditability and reputation. It’s what they call “good politics”

 

[HappyJoy]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

 

[Lesh]

We spent well over a TRILLION dollars on the last Republican War...

Imagine what that money could have done. Healthcare...infrastructure...college...social security...Medicare.

And here those same Republicans are gearing up to blow another trillion or two...after telling us how broke we are

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

All these fukwits say no more war...then they get in office.

 

[Nostra]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What war are we in that Trump started?

 

[MAGAman]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

If "Being Evil's Bitch" is what you meant, I agree.

 

[lennypartiv]

All these fukwits say no more war...then they get in office.

Exactly. Once in the White House, these people realize war is necessary.

 

[Kosh]

Yet Obama started illegal wars and the far left was silent!

Warren will start more wars, just by doing what Obama did!

 

[JGalt]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What she actually means is "surrender."

You need to read between the lines with that cuck.

 

[HappyJoy]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What war are we in that Trump started?

The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.

 

[Kilroy2]

It's like Vietnam all over again. The libs can't wait to protest.

<< No war with Iran. De-escalation now.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who is running for president, called the move "reckless" in an initial tweet Thursday night. Friday, she followed up with a series of tweets saying the strike brought the U.S. to "the brink of yet another war in the Middle East—one that would be devastating in terms of lives lost and resources wasted." >>

'No War With Iran': Massachusetts Lawmakers On Soleimani Killing

Let see

Korean war was to stop communism, well it was a draw with American lives lost

Vietnam - a war to stop communism and failed miserable with American lives lost

Iraq war - wrong country to begin with because Bin laden wasn' t their and no weapons of mass destruction
- country then was beat up by a rag tag army called ISIS
- US and the coalition bailed them out
-Afganistan - I guess to attack more terrorist

Russian Communism fails without one shot being fired
just JFK blockade of Cuban to tell the Russians to go back home

China even still communism but now has free enterprise as part of country
no shot being fired

Iran - was killing one man worth it.
Trump boasted that OB would start a war with Iran just to get reelected
yet OB negotiated with them and it is now Trump who would start a war with Iran to get reelected

It can be said that the drone shot was heard around the world

Irony defined is to kill one man to save american lives yet if war is inevitable it didn't save american lives

American the land of the brave or the land of the gullible



Repubs strategy at its best, now that is Ironic

 

[dblack]

It's like Vietnam all over again. The libs can't wait to protest.

This is where I'm totally on board with liberals. War sucks. I can't imagine what kind of sick fuck would disagree.

 

[Kosh]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What war are we in that Trump started?

The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.

Yes we know the far left is wanting a war with Iran now, all because they hate Trump!

 

[Rocko]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What war are we in that Trump started?

The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.

We’re not starting with Iran, treasonous

 

[DGS49]

The crowded Democrat field results in candidates saying ANYTHING they think will bring them attention, even negative attention.

There is NO prospect of a long and expensive war with Iran. Iran can be brought to its figurative knees with a fifteen-minute drone attack that disables their refineries.

And they know it.

We are looking at another example of their making incredibly violent threats, followed by a couple of weak attacks on soft targets. (Note the literal use of the word, "incredibly").

 

[HappyJoy]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What war are we in that Trump started?

The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.

Yes we know the far left is wanting a war with Iran now, all because they hate Trump!

I (assuming I'm the far left here) want a war with Iran? How far up your ass did you pull that one out from?

 

[dblack]

The crowded Democrat field results in candidates saying ANYTHING they think will bring them attention, even negative attention.

There is NO prospect of a long and expensive war with Iran. Iran can be brought to its figurative knees with a fifteen-minute drone attack that disables their refineries.

And they know it.

We are looking at another example of their making incredibly violent threats, followed by a couple of weak attacks on soft targets. (Note the literal use of the word, "incredibly").

China gets a significant amount of its oil from Iran. If we go stomping around over there, do you think they might take an interest?

 

[Kosh]

It's like Vietnam all over again. The libs can't wait to protest.

<< No war with Iran. De-escalation now.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who is running for president, called the move "reckless" in an initial tweet Thursday night. Friday, she followed up with a series of tweets saying the strike brought the U.S. to "the brink of yet another war in the Middle East—one that would be devastating in terms of lives lost and resources wasted." >>

'No War With Iran': Massachusetts Lawmakers On Soleimani Killing

Let see

Korean war was to stop communism, well it was a draw

Vietnam - a war to stop communism and failed miserable

Iraq

WWII was stop the Nazi's

Although the US was lied into that war and attacked a country that did not attack the US, it was ok then right?

Vietnam was political and war, just like Korea.

 

[JGalt]

Didn't Trump run on no more wars? I believe Warren actually means it.

What war are we in that Trump started?

The one we are starting with Iran. Wars start when you kill people. The bloodiest war over 100 years ago started with a harmless assassination.

Wars do start when you kill people. But they also end when you kill alot of people. We seem to have forgotten what it takes to win them:. You only win wars when you hurt the enemy so bad, that he doesn't want to fight any more. Korea, Vietnam, and the whole Middle East thing could have ended the same way World Wars One and Two ended but somewhere along the way, we lost our nerve. We became soft and "politically correct." Which is a dangerous thing because our enemies are neither "soft" nor "politically correct."