Watch live: Biden signs gay marriage bill with drag queens, Pelosi, Cyndi Lauper, Homophobe GOP Rep Vicki Hartzler's gay nephew & others in attendance

It is still heavily influenced by religious dogma, I think.

I have no problem with expanding marriage to include more than two people.
The real dogma is the godless Progressive Socialist one. the House passed a bill to move Puerto Rico into potential statehood. Woe to this nation. And it will be deserved. America, America...you have lost your way.
 
The government need not make accommodation for a fetish unless it accommodates all.

And that’s the point of this isn’t it.

Just the other day we had a trans activist, who is on camera saying children just want to suck D, being honored by an appearance in our White House.

See what happens when we accommodate fetish?

Homosexuality is not a fetish.
 
The real dogma is the godless Progressive Socialist one. the House passed a bill to move Puerto Rico into potential statehood. Woe to this nation. And it will be deserved. America, America...you have lost your way.

So Puerto Rico gaining independence is part of the supposed downfall of America?
 
Fetish tends to be sexual. Homosexuality is not just sexual, but who you love.

The practitioners of most fetishes often love there partners.

And, what is the distinguishing physical trait that differs between a gay male and a straight male? Between a straight female and a lesbian?

This has gone way to far.

Not only do we now have a trans activist that says children just want to suck d***, but we’ve been forced to see the term “woman” redefined.

Enough of this enabling.
 
The practitioners of most fetishes often love there partners.

And, what is the distinguishing physical trait that differs between a gay male and a straight male? Between a straight female and a lesbian?

This has gone way to far.

Not only do we now have a trans activist that says children just want to suck d***, but we’ve been forced to see the term “woman” redefined.

Enough of this enabling.

As a straight male, I cannot fathom feeling romantic love for another man. A gay man cannot fathom feeling romantic love for a woman.

It is not a fetish. It is emotionally and sexually different from heterosexuals.
 
As a straight male, I cannot fathom feeling romantic love for another man. A gay man cannot fathom feeling romantic love for a woman.

It is not a fetish. It is emotionally and sexually different from heterosexuals.

Proof please. I’ve posted about a gay man, married and in love with a lesbian for over 33 years.
 
Proof please. I’ve posted about a gay man, married and in love with a lesbian for over 33 years.
Proof? You have offered no proof of your claims that children are the reason for marriage. You have posted assumptions and traditions, but nothing stated in the marriage laws.
 
Proof? You have offered no proof of your claims that children are the reason for marriage. You have posted assumptions and traditions, but nothing stated in the marriage laws.

And you claim to be straight? You can’t prove you are straight or gay. I could proclaim to be either yet their is no way, through medical examination to prove either way. Hell, I could “proclaim” that most married people are actually closeted gays and you could not “prove” this wrong.

In doing so I have just proven that gays can indeed successfully married those of the opposite sex and we’re happy doing so.
 
And you claim to be straight? You can’t prove you are straight or gay. I could proclaim to be either yet their is no way, through medical examination to prove either way. Hell, I could “proclaim” that most married people are actually closeted gays and you could not “prove” this wrong.

In doing so I have just proven that gays can indeed successfully married those of the opposite sex and we’re happy doing so.

If they are gay, the person they are in love with, and they in love with them, is the same gender. No need for proof.

Much like you have no proof marriage is all about children.
 
If they are gay, the person they are in love with, and they in love with them, is the same gender. No need for proof.

Much like you have no proof marriage is all about children.

Then you need to explain, especially with same sex couples, they “not be too closely” related.

Unless I’m missing something, the fetish practice of same sex intercourse cannot create a child.
 
Then you need to explain, especially with same sex couples, they “not be too closely” related.

Unless I’m missing something, the fetish practice of same sex intercourse cannot create a child.

I don't need to explain anything. The "not too closely related" is a minor part of marriage laws.

The people who wrote the law and included that are the ones to ask. But, if I were to guess, I would say they just had the law in effect and left it there, since it would have no effect.
 
I don't need to explain anything. The "not too closely related" is a minor part of marriage laws.

The people who wrote the law and included that are the ones to ask. But, if I were to guess, I would say they just had the law in effect and left it there, since it would have no effect.
🤦‍♂️
 

Forum List

Back
Top