What did Hannity discuss with Cohen?

[Soggy in NOLA]

Hannity had an ethical obligation to fully disclose all aspects of his relationship with Cohen and With Trump. He failed to do so. He should be fired!

He should also be tarred and feathered, drawn and quartered, flogged, burned at the stake, hung, whipped and disemboweled...not necessarily in that order...just for being the person that he is.

BTW - I do not like Hannity!

He had an ethical obligation? How do you figure? As for the rest of your insane diatribe...

 

[jc456]

Hannity had an ethical obligation to fully disclose all aspects of his relationship with Cohen and With Trump. He failed to do so. He should be fired!

He should also be tarred and feathered, drawn and quartered, flogged, burned at the stake, hung, whipped and disemboweled...not necessarily in that order...just for being the person that he is.

BTW - I do not like Hannity!

huh? explain this law to me.

 

[Siete]

What did Hannity discuss with Cohen?

they should have discussed keeping their story straight -


youre my client

no I'm not

yes you are


DERP DERP DERP

 

[Mac1958]

None of us know right now. But we'll have plenty of partisan assumptions and fantasies.

why do you care?

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

 

[jc456]

What did Hannity discuss with Cohen?

they should have discussed keeping their story straight -


youre my client

no I'm not

yes you areno


DERP DERP DERP

nothing to see here of relevance.

 

[jc456]

None of us know right now. But we'll have plenty of partisan assumptions and fantasies.

why do you care?

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

you said this right? then it's you.

 

[Siete]

None of us know right now. But we'll have plenty of partisan assumptions and fantasies.

why do you care?

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

neither am I --

jc stays confused, pay no attention

 

[Mac1958]

None of us know right now. But we'll have plenty of partisan assumptions and fantasies.

why do you care?

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

you said this right? then it's you.

Yes, that's me. I didn't ask about Hannity.

Is this a trick question?
.

 

[jc456]

None of us know right now. But we'll have plenty of partisan assumptions and fantasies.

why do you care?

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

neither am I --

jc stays confused, pay no attention

thanks for the lovin.

 

[jc456]

why do you care?

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

you said this right? then it's you.

Yes, that's me. I didn't ask about Hannity.

Is this a trick question?
.

the thread is about hannity and you're in it. Helloooooooooo

 

[Mac1958]

Because I'm fascinated by the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

Thanks for asking!
.

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

you said this right? then it's you.

Yes, that's me. I didn't ask about Hannity.

Is this a trick question?
.

the thread is about hannity and you're in it. Helloooooooooo

Okie dokie.
.

 

[boedicca]

I don't care. Hannity can talk to whomever he wishes.

 

[jc456]

then why are you asking about hannity?

Do you have me confused with someone else? I'm not asking about Hannity.

I said that none of know. None of do.
.

you said this right? then it's you.

Yes, that's me. I didn't ask about Hannity.

Is this a trick question?
.

the thread is about hannity and you're in it. Helloooooooooo

Okie dokie.
.

anytime

 

[jc456]

I don't care. Hannity can talk to whomever he wishes.

the left just want him to die.

 

[edward37]

i imagine spit or swallow was the main topic.

And I’m sure you could give good console on which, giving the number of times you’ve had to decide after your romps with Obama.

good console?



spit it out, pops

Swallow it Del

2 of the 3 clients Cohen has
paid off women who had extramarital affairs. Is that his legal specialty? Is that why Hannity sought his legal advice? To protect himself from women who have the goods on him? Why was Hannity so defensive about having his name disclosed if it wasn’t to conceal schtooping a porn star, prostitute or a Playmate?

it's amazing how you let your hatred speculate your thoughts into reality so easily. would this be done to you, you'd likely be pissed as hell.

Ice maybe OT but maybe a smart guy like you can tell me why Trump cancelled russian sanctions? Did Hannity tell him?

 

[Care4all]

Maybe Hannity was just seeking advice from Cohen on what the president wanted him to focus on, in his next nightly Show on FOX State TV??? And they do not want us to know?

 

[hjmick]

I truly have no idea. I know what I'd speculate it may have been: some sort of arrangement whereby Hannity used Cohen as a conduit for arranging to "kiss Trump's ass" and then stick his head way the hell up inside it.

What do you imagine they discussed?

Well, they certainly didn't discuss how he'd lose what very, very little credibility he had would be lost once it was revealed that he had an association with Cohen which he didn't reveal while he ranted and raved about the injustice of the raid on Cohen's office...



Ah who am I kidding? Hannity hasn't had any credibility for a decade or more...

 

[boedicca]

I don't care. Hannity can talk to whomever he wishes.

the left just want him to die.

Of course they do. They want every one who engages in WrongThink and refuses to Shut Up to die.

 

[Siete]

Maybe Hannity was just seeking advice from Cohen on what the president wanted him to focus on, in his next nightly Show on FOX State TV??? And they do not want us to know?

since Cohen's story told IN A COURT OF LAW doesnt match Hannitys outside a court of law, neither one of them has any credibility FROM NOW ON with a Judge.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Hannity had an ethical obligation to fully disclose all aspects of his relationship with Cohen and With Trump. He failed to do so. He should be fired!

He should also be tarred and feathered, drawn and quartered, flogged, burned at the stake, hung, whipped and disemboweled...not necessarily in that order...just for being the person that he is.

BTW - I do not like Hannity!

huh? explain this law to me.

It's self-explanatory... he's a whackadoodle.