What does the Trump tape really mean to the average American man?

[S.J.]

Several of them have already been debunked. You forgot to mention that minor detail.

Link bro link LOL
A Timeline of Donald Trump's Inappropriate History With Women

HERE IT IS=> List of Debunked Groper Allegations by Corrupt Media Against Donald Trump

That is "Gateway Pundit"...is that trash right wing shit supposed to out weight what is being reported by real media ?
UPDATED: Gateway Pundit can't keep track of his own lies
Confederacy of Hoaxes : snopes.com

By "real media" you mean MSNBC?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

keep track of his own lies
Confederacy of Hoaxes : snopes.com
By "real media" you mean MSNBC?

Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'

That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.

In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.

Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.

 

[owebo]

keep track of his own lies
Confederacy of Hoaxes : snopes.com
By "real media" you mean MSNBC?

Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'

That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.

In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.

Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.

The best part about the NYT is that Trump will build a wall with Mexico...

 

[S.J.]

Who Is Jill Harth? She Filed A Sexual Harassment Suit Against Trump
Romper‎ - 2 days ago
Vox cited to a lawsuit that Harth filed against Trump in 1997. Harth's lawsuit claimed that ...
Here's Every Current Accusation of Sexual Misconduct Against Donald Trump
PEOPLE.com‎ - 2 days ago
All the Women Accusing Trump of Rape, Sexual Assault

Plenty of accusations but no proof, no evidence, but you don't seem to want to acknowledge that several of them have been proven false. The witness on the plane, the one who supposedly watched in horror, said Trump never touched her and that she saying she couldn't believe she got to meet Donald Trump. Also confirmed the seats were not designed the way the accuser claimed.

 

[Dale Smith]

keep track of his own lies
Confederacy of Hoaxes : snopes.com
By "real media" you mean MSNBC?

Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'

That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.

In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.

Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.

What a compolete load of horseshit.....seriously, that was lamer than watching a cat trying to bury it's shit on a frozen sidewalk...sans of any proof whatsoever. Bill "drop trou" and his sexcapdaes go back to his days in Arkansas including those willing and not so willing...then we have his pedophilia peccadilloes with Jeffrey Epstein that got off light because he had the goods on those that had partaken of the underage girls and boys he provided for the power elite.

Stupid fucks like you believe that they have the right to do any fucking thing they want.

 

[S.J.]

keep track of his own lies
Confederacy of Hoaxes : snopes.com
By "real media" you mean MSNBC?

Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'

That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.

In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.

Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.

Please stop altering my posts.

 

[owebo]

keep track of his own lies
Confederacy of Hoaxes : snopes.com
By "real media" you mean MSNBC?

Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'

That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.

In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.

Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.

Please stop altering my posts.

It's what fascists do....I don't consider them human....

 

[Boss]

THAT would have been a VIOLATION OF FEDERAL FUCKING LAW!

Now I think I've heard everything.

Laugh like a jackass all you like, it's a violation of federal law for any candidate to correspond with any PAC during a political campaign. You can go to prison for up to 2 years and people have. So no, Cruz could NOT have "asked them to not do it" and he is not obligated to police all the assorted PACs to ensure they follow his standards.

It's pitiful how I have reduced you to such a drooling little retard.

He had a MORAL obligation to condemn it and he FAILED. So do YOU, fucker.

Again... it's not Cruz's responsibility to run around monitoring what any PAC does... condemning it, approving it or whatever. He can't legally tell them what to do or even correspond with them. Do you not know the law?

Go educate yourself, it's called McCain-Feingold.

You know damn good and well I'm talking about a PUBLIC condemnation of the super pac. There's nothing illegal about doing that and you know it. You've been kicked out of the closet and the best you can come up with is "But, but he would go to jail if he condemned the super pac's tactics". Total BULLSHIT and everyone knows it. It doesn't get more pathetic than that.

There is no reason or expectation for Cruz to condemn something a PAC did that he had absolutely nothing to do with and no knowledge of. If he spent his campaign time condemning everyone who attacked Trump he wouldn't have had time to campaign. I don't know what you're thinking here... no one else that I am aware of condemned what the PAC did... why do you think Cruz should have?

I said he could go to jail if he "asked them to not do it" as you suggested. Cruz can't contact a PAC and/or tell them what to do. That's a violation of law. If you're too stupid to comprehend that, I don't know what to tell you... it's campaign finance law... he cannot have contact with ANY PAC and doing so would be a violation of federal law. Is that not penetrating your granite-like head or something? Besides, he doesn't know what they are going to do... how was he supposed to ask them not to?

You're just living in your own fucked up little universe here dude... are you really THAT ignorant of what PACs are for and why they exist and why candidates cannot have contact with them?

What part of PUBLIC do you not understand?

Well, I have no idea what you're talking about. Candidates don't even run their own PACs much less unaffiliated PACs. It's a matter of campaign finance law and you can go to jail for up to two years if you're caught communicating with ANY PAC while running for office.

So what is it you think Cruz should have done about an anti-Trump PAC who he had no knowledge of, putting out photos of Melania that had already been internationally published? Keep in mind, it's not Cruz's job to defend Trump from unwarranted attacks or condemn said attacks. Also keep in mind, Donald Trump used debunked nonsensical stories from the National Enquirer to smear Cruz's family.

Silly me... asking you to keep things in mind... you've obviously lost your damn mind... I don't know what I am thinking.

 

[S.J.]

Now I think I've heard everything.

Laugh like a jackass all you like, it's a violation of federal law for any candidate to correspond with any PAC during a political campaign. You can go to prison for up to 2 years and people have. So no, Cruz could NOT have "asked them to not do it" and he is not obligated to police all the assorted PACs to ensure they follow his standards.

It's pitiful how I have reduced you to such a drooling little retard.

He had a MORAL obligation to condemn it and he FAILED. So do YOU, fucker.

Again... it's not Cruz's responsibility to run around monitoring what any PAC does... condemning it, approving it or whatever. He can't legally tell them what to do or even correspond with them. Do you not know the law?

Go educate yourself, it's called McCain-Feingold.

You know damn good and well I'm talking about a PUBLIC condemnation of the super pac. There's nothing illegal about doing that and you know it. You've been kicked out of the closet and the best you can come up with is "But, but he would go to jail if he condemned the super pac's tactics". Total BULLSHIT and everyone knows it. It doesn't get more pathetic than that.

There is no reason or expectation for Cruz to condemn something a PAC did that he had absolutely nothing to do with and no knowledge of. If he spent his campaign time condemning everyone who attacked Trump he wouldn't have had time to campaign. I don't know what you're thinking here... no one else that I am aware of condemned what the PAC did... why do you think Cruz should have?

I said he could go to jail if he "asked them to not do it" as you suggested. Cruz can't contact a PAC and/or tell them what to do. That's a violation of law. If you're too stupid to comprehend that, I don't know what to tell you... it's campaign finance law... he cannot have contact with ANY PAC and doing so would be a violation of federal law. Is that not penetrating your granite-like head or something? Besides, he doesn't know what they are going to do... how was he supposed to ask them not to?

You're just living in your own fucked up little universe here dude... are you really THAT ignorant of what PACs are for and why they exist and why candidates cannot have contact with them?

What part of PUBLIC do you not understand?

Well, I have no idea what you're talking about. Candidates don't even run their own PACs much less unaffiliated PACs. It's a matter of campaign finance law and you can go to jail for up to two years if you're caught communicating with ANY PAC while running for office.

So what is it you think Cruz should have done about an anti-Trump PAC who he had no knowledge of, putting out photos of Melania that had already been internationally published? Keep in mind, it's not Cruz's job to defend Trump from unwarranted attacks or condemn said attacks. Also keep in mind, Donald Trump used debunked nonsensical stories from the National Enquirer to smear Cruz's family.

Silly me... asking you to keep things in mind... you've obviously lost your damn mind... I don't know what I am thinking.

I'm really not interested in this discussion anymore. You don't have anything new to say, you just keep repeating your tired talking points. We're done here.

 

[Boss]

I'm really not interested in this discussion anymore. You don't have anything new to say, you just keep repeating your tired talking points. We're done here.

Oh, no doubt you're not interested in this conversation anymore... it's because you realize how fatally flawed your argument was and what an absolute dufus it made you look like trying to defend it.

You've somehow transformed into a complete kook-a-doodle liberal through this election cycle. Your debate tactics are exactly the same... throw out some baseless allegation that is easily disproved and when you're schooled, claim the "conversation" is ridiculous and we're done.

You know, it's sad to me that this election, the liberal democrats are pretty much out-of-the-closet Socialists but even more sad is that a good percentage of Republicans have gone completely bonkers and are behaving just like the liberals.