Challenger
Gold Member
- Jun 25, 2014
- 5,586
- 725
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.
No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.
This is a standard Hasbara troll tactic, "balanced, fair and understanding way?" oh please! When the Palestinians retaliate to Zionist provocations they're being "belligerent", thus justifying a massively disproportionate response. This cartoon sums up the situation in a "fair, balanced and understanding" way
Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.